Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Parexel | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray in patients with mild infections of diabetic foot ulcers. Eligible subjects will be randomized (1:1:1) to receive twice a day, 14 days treatment of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (1‰), Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (2‰) and topical placebo (vehicle) spray. In this study, the cut-off date for final analysis is defined as the time when all subjects have completed the last visit or discontinued the study
This is a Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray in patients with mild infections of diabetic foot ulcers. Approximately 90 patients (30 per treatment group) will be randomized in this study. Eligible subjects will be randomized (1:1:1) to receive twice a day, 14 days treatment of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (1‰), Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (2‰) and placebo of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (vehicle). In this study, the cut-off date for final analysis is defined as the time when all subjects have completed the last visit or discontinued the study. The duration of the whole study is planned for 24 months; the duration of each participant is about 4-5 weeks, including Screening period/Baseline (about 7 days), treatment period (about 14 days), Follow-up period (about 7-14 days). No interim analysis will be performed in this study. This study is a phase II study, and no statistical hypothesis is proposed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray: 1 mg/g (1‰) | Experimental | Eligible subjects will be randomized (1:1:1) to receive twice a day, 14 days treatment of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (1‰) |
|
| Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray:2 mg/g (2‰) | Experimental | Eligible subjects will be randomized (1:1:1) to receive twice a day, 14 days treatment of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (2‰) |
|
| Topical placebo (vehicle) | Placebo Comparator | Eligible subjects will be randomized (1:1:1) to receive twice a day, 14 days treatment of Antimicrobial Placebo of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (vehicle). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray and Placebo | Drug | Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray At about 5 cm vertically above the wound, the investigator sprays antimicrobial peptide PL-5 topical spray on the test wound. The cover area after spraying is a cone with a surface diameter of about 5 cm and area about 20 cm2. One spray dose is about 0.1 ml. The number of drug sprays is determined according to the wound area in the screening period, and the determined dose is applied consistently. During the operation, an effective spray operation is completely ejected with no leakage. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical response | the Investigator will grade the clinical response as (1)"infection resolved or cured" (all signs and symptoms of infection resolved);(2)"infection improving"(most, but not all, signs and symptoms of infection improved or resolved)(3)"treatment failure" (≥1 signs or symptoms of infection substantially worsening), (4)"unevaluable"(<3 days of study treatment or patient lost to follow-up), or (5)"recurrence"(a previously cured or improved infection showing worsening of signs or symptoms of infection) | At EOT (End-of-therapy: within 24 hours after the final dose) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Microbiological response | Microbiological culture examination of wound tissue; Analysis of drug sensitivity test results; Analysis of MIC50, MIC90, geometric mean inhibitory concentration and range results of clinically isolated pathogenic bacteria. At baseline, day 1, and at all other study visits, Investigators will culture samples obtained from the wound at which culturable material and signs of infection are present. They will obtain specimens using tissue curettage with a sterile scalpel, place them into transport media, and ship them to the designated central laboratory for species identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. For specific operations of bacteriological examination of wound tissue, please refer to the clinical microbiology operation manual. Result: 1)Resolved;2) Improved;3)Failure 4) Colonization 5) Superinfection. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age between 18 to 65 years.
Non-hospitalized ambulatory subjects with Diabetes mellitus, Type I or II, according to the American Diabetes Association criteria.
HbA1c ≤12% at screening.
At baseline visit (after any required debridement), presence of Grade 2 diabetic foot infection [Grade 2 of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) classification]
Infection present, as defined by the presence of at least 2 of the following items:
Mild infection of an ulcer is defined as:
Presence of ≥2 manifestations of inflammation (purulence or erythema, tenderness, warmth, or induration), but any cellulitis/erythema extends ≤2cm around the ulcer, and infection is limited to the skin or superficial subcutaneous tissues; no other local complications or systemic illness.
Voluntary written consent, given before performance of any clinical investigation-related procedure not part of standard medical care, and with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn at any time without prejudice to future medical care.
Female subjects must meet at least one of the following additional criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILD Research Center | Vista | California | 92081 | United States | ||
| Bioresearch Partner Holdings, LLLP |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38861260 | Background | Wei Y, Li Y, Li X, Zhao Y, Xu J, Wang H, Rong X, Xiong J, Chen X, Luo G, Lv G, Lin C, Han C, Yu H, Zhang Y, Tang S, Fan Y, Tu J, Xia C, Zu H, Liu W, Liu C, Liu J, Zhang B, Nong Q, Li T, Wang L, Song G, Su Y, Chen Z, Lai W, Fu Y, Yu J, Zhang P, Yang W, Yao G, Zhang H, Fan K, Dong H, Chen Y, Wu J; PL-5 Investigators. Peceleganan Spray for the Treatment of Skin Wound Infections: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2415310. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15310. | |
| 35781462 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Eligible subjects will be randomized (1:1:1) to receive twice a day, 14 days treatment of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (1‰), Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (2‰) and placebo of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (vehicle).
Not provided
Not provided
Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray and placebo will not be identical in physical appearance. In order to ensure the objectivity of evaluation, the Sponsor, investigators, and other persons involved in the subject evaluation and trial implement (e.g., the Sponsor, subjects, investigators, clinical research associates, data managers, statistician, etc.) should be blinded. Blinded persons including investigators should not try to identify the group of subjects. Blind codes encrypted electronically will be stored in the Sponsor's department of medicine supply during clinical trials, and unblinding is not allowed before database lock.
|
|
| Interim Clinical Evaluation (ICE): 7 days after the initiation of the study drug. End of Therapy (EOT): within 24 hours after the final dose. Post-therapy evaluation (PTE): 7-14 days after the final dose. |
| Comprehensive Response | At EOT and PTE, the Investigator will grade the comprehensive response as (1)"cure"(patients are clinically cured, and the bacteria are eradicated or presumed eradicated.);(2)"failure" (patients are classified as clinical failure or/and microbiological responses are failure and superinfection) or (3)"indeterminate"(if both clinical and microbiological responses are indeterminate). | End of Therapy (EOT): within 24 hours after the final dose. Post-therapy evaluation (PTE):7-14 days after the final dose. |
| Safety and tolerability | The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), and clinically significant changes in physical examination, vital signs, laboratory tests, and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) | Interim Clinical Evaluation (ICE): 7 days after the initiation of the study drug. End of Therapy (EOT): within 24 hours after the final dose. Post-therapy evaluation (PTE): 7-14 days after the final dose |
| Clinical response | At each visit after enrollment, the Investigator will grade the clinical response as (1)"infection resolved or cured" (all signs and symptoms of infection resolved);(2)"infection improving"(most, but not all, signs and symptoms of infection improved or resolved)(3)"treatment failure" (≥1 signs or symptoms of infection substantially worsening), (4)"unevaluable"(<3 days of study treatment or patient lost to follow-up), or (5)"recurrence"(a previously cured or improved infection showing worsening of signs or symptoms of infection) | Interim Clinical Evaluation (ICE): 7 days after the initiation of the study drug. End of Therapy (EOT): within 24 hours after the final dose. Post-therapy evaluation (PTE): 7-14 days after the final dose. |
| Wound infection Score and Total Wound Score | A "wound infection score" was semiquantitatively assessed by grading each of 7 parameters with a score of 0-3: (1) purulent drainage, (2) nonpurulent drainage, (3) erythema, (4) induration, (5) tenderness, (6) pain, and (7) local warmth. | At baseline, day 1, and at all other study visits, investigators will compile a "total wound score" that included ratings of signs and symptoms of infection, wound measurements (maximum length, width, and depth), and assessment of granulation tissue. |
| Miami |
| Florida |
| 33175 |
| United States |
| Santos Research Center, Corp | Tampa | Florida | 33615 | United States |
| Background |
| Wei Y, Wu J, Chen Y, Fan K, Yu X, Li X, Zhao Y, Li Y, Lv G, Song G, Rong X, Lin C, Wang H, Chen X, Zhang P, Han C, Zu H, Liu W, Zhang Y, Liu C, Su Y, Zhang B, Sun B, Wang L, Lai W, Liu J, Xia C, Ji G, Zhu F, Yu J, Ahemaiti A, Dong H, Chen M; PL-5 Investigators. Efficacy and Safety of PL-5 (Peceleganan) Spray for Wound Infections: A Phase IIb Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):43-49. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005508. Epub 2022 Jul 4. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017719 | Diabetic Foot |
| D014946 | Wound Infection |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003925 | Diabetic Angiopathies |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D016523 | Foot Ulcer |
| D007871 | Leg Ulcer |
| D012883 | Skin Ulcer |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D048909 | Diabetes Complications |
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D003929 | Diabetic Neuropathies |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided