Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Weizmann Institute of Science | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The increasing shift from face-to-face to online patient-clinician encounters in the healthcare system requires patients to be more involved in their medical care. This raises the urgent need to evaluate the extent to which proactive patients' self-care can be supported, particularly by informed telemedicine digital channels. Despite this imperative, research offering evidence-based instructional design of digital education remains surprisingly scarce. Embracing the framework of science education, which highlights the functional role of different knowledge types in educational processes, the current study seeks to evaluate an educational approach aimed at supporting cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Cancer treatment serves as an exemplar health condition, demanding daily self-management from patients. The objectives of our research are as follows: (1) To delineate the types of knowledge required for effective symptom management, active participation in one's healthcare, and judicious decision-making regarding emergency room (ER) visits, with a focus on mechanistic knowledge pertaining to the rationale for treatment and procedural knowledge concerning the treatment regimen. (2) To appraise the impact of a digital learning environment in contrast to traditional methods on patients' acquisition of mechanistic and procedural knowledge. (3) To identify how patients engage with the digital patient education environment aiming to outline leaning patterns.
The investigators hypothesize that implementing digital education will enhance patients' understanding of both the 'why' (mechanistic) and 'how' (procedural) aspects of their treatment. Importantly, the investigators expect that mechanistic knowledge will be more impactful than procedural knowledge, leading to better symptom management and patient involvement, and ultimately reducing unnecessary visits to the ER.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Educational intervention group | Experimental |
| |
| Control group | No Intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital education | Behavioral | Patients assigned to the experimental group will learn about symptom self-management in a digital learning environment. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Symptom self-management knowledge | Measured by performance accuracy in a cancer-specific knowledge test | The test will be conducted in two time-points of the study, Time 0 (pre) and Time 2 (after two months) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Self-efficacy in symptom management | Measured by self-report Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale. The scale ranges from 1 (not confident) to 10 (very confident). A higher score is interpreted as a better self-efficacy. | The questionnaire will be administered three times: Time 0 (pre) and Time 2 (after two months) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ilana Dubovi | Contact | +97254-7922358 | tairvi@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ichilov Hospital | Recruiting | Tel Aviv | 6423906 | Israel |
upon request
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Confidence in decision making |
Measured by the self-report Decision Self-Efficacy Scale, which assesses patients' self-confidence in their ability to make decisions. It includes 11 items on a scale ranging from 0 (not at all confident) to 4 (very confident). A higher score is interpreted as higher confidence. |
| The questionnaire will be administered in two time-points of the study, Time 0 (pre) and Time 2 (after two months) |
| Patients engagement while learning | Patients engagement with patient education material will be captured by psychophysiological parameters of eye-tracking and facial expressions | on Time 2, namely about two weeks to four weeks after recruitment |