Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In its 2012's release guideline on therapy for schizophrenia, the EMA joined the FDA to acknowledge primary and persistent negative symptoms (PNS) as an unmet need in the treatment of schizophrenia. Functional brain imaging studies showed a correlation between NS and reduced perfusion in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC). Pre-frontal activation (PFA) using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) significantly improve PNS (meta-analyses: effect size SMD = 0.55, ΔPANSS-N = -2.5). Yet schizophrenia is likely to gather many different natural entities of distinct pathophysiological mechanisms. Pursuing a one-size-fits-all approach will not adapt to this diversity and might account for inconsistencies in the results.
Progressive periodic catatonia (PPC) is a rare psychotic phenotype (0.1 - 0.5 ‰) which has been shown to be longitudinally stable (30-years follow-up) and consistent within families (about 1 third of first-degree relatives are affected). The core of this phenotype is a disintegration of psychomotor processes which progresses with each relapse, resulting in a "deficit state", i.e., PNS, responsible for most social and occupational disabilities. The investigators and others reported PPC to come with hyper-perfusions in premotor cortices compared to controls or non-PPC chronic psychoses (nPPC). These hyper-perfusions discriminate PPC from nPPC or depressive patients (Sensitivity = 82%; Specificity = 95%). Last, in independent proof-of-principle studies the investigators and others have shown that premotor inhibition (PMI) using rTMS significantly improved PNS in PPC and that the most dramatic improvements followed personalized accelerated rTMS protocols (5 days of rTMS; CGI-improvement = 2 which is equivalent to ΔPANSS-N = -10; lasting > 1 month - vs virtually no change for PFA). The efficacy index was very good (no side effects).
the investigators hypothesize that: (1) in PPC, add-on personalized premotor inhibition (PMI) is more effective in reducing PNS than L-DLPFC activation (PFA); (2) patient stratification is relevant as personalized PMI will not be as effective in the nPPC group (even expected to be less effective than PFA).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| N°1: PMI in PPC | Experimental | Progressive periodic catatonia (SSD phenotype) Premotor inhibition using personalized rTMS (40 sec continuous theta-burst on each of the 5 targets corresponding to hyper-perfused regions, i.e. functional biomarker, 120%). N = 40. |
|
| N°2: PFA in PPC | Active Comparator | Progressive periodic catatonia (SSD phenotype) Classical left-prefrontal activation using intermittent theta-burst rTMS (72 trains, 120%). N = 40. |
|
| N°3: PMI in nPPC | Active Comparator | Other phenotype of SSD than PPC (nPPC) Premotor inhibition using personalized rTMS (40 sec continuous theta-burst on each of the 5 targets corresponding to most perfused premotor regions). N = 40. |
|
| N°4: PFA in nPPC | Experimental | Non-progressive periodic catatonia SSD phenotype Classical left-prefrontal activation (PFA) using intermittent theta-burst rTMS (72 trains, 120%). N = 40. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personalized rTMS | Procedure | 5 "personalized" targets accessible to TMS (at less than 3.5 cm distance from the scalp or the coil's hot spot) are placed in the hyper-perfused premotor regions. The patient is installed on the robotic device. The technician puts a neuro-navigation tracker on the subject's forehead and proceeds to the co-registration. The motor threshold is defined, and stimulator output's intensity is adjusted accordingly (120%) The robotic system ensures that the actual stimulation is performed according to the personalized protocol. This adequacy will be evaluated secondarily based on the recordings of the coil positions during each |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Decrement in positive and negative syndrome scale - negative sub-score (ΔPANSS-N). | Positive and negative syndrome scale - negative sub-score ΔPANSS-N = ΔN1 + ΔN2 + ΔN3 + ΔN4 + ΔN6 PMI personalized rTMS superiority claim in PPC: ANOVA within-between 2 factors interaction (two-way comparison):
Precision medicine claim (phenotype-dependent response): 3-way ANOVA (interaction between the 2 between and 1 within factors):
| Pre-rTMS and end-of-trial (before - week 4, and 6 weeks after rTMS - week12). |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Foucher, MD | Contact | 03.88.11.69.21 | jack.foucher@chru-strasbourg.fr |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012559 | Schizophrenia |
| D053609 | Lethargy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019967 | Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Informants (caregivers)
|
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |