The intervention group will likely consist of one to two sessions, conducted in-person, coupled with text- or phone-based client navigation.The intervention group will complete three major assessments: baseline (T1), at the conclusion of the intervention (T2), and a three-month follow-up (T3). Until the follow-up assessment, the interventionist will send participants up to 6 SMS messages (one-way) per month. The content of these messages will be developed collaboratively between the participant and the interventionist during the second session; messages could include reminders about follow-ups and/or prompts to use new skills and resources for navigating specific barriers.

The treatment as usual (TAU) group will receive treatment as usual, including being notified of their abnormal Pap results via SMS and instructed to set up a follow-up appointment, as is typical in routine care. The TAU group will complete the T1 assessment and will complete T2 assessment two-months post-baseline.

Aim 1 data will inform this intervention, however the participant intervention will likely be one or two sessions, conducted in-person, coupled with text- or phone-based client navigation with women who received abnormal high-risk Pap smear results. We anticipate that the intervention may integrate (1) information to improve awareness of cervical cancer susceptibility and treatment, (2) motivational interviewing to assess pros and cons of attending a follow-up appointment and completing treatment; (3) brief cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) skills to reduce individual-level barriers, (4) problem-solving to increase social support, and (5) patient navigation tools to mitigate clinic-level challenges.

Feasibility will be demonstrated if all three are met by participants: (1) 50% of participants who are approached choose to enroll; (2) 70% of participants complete the intervention; and (3) 60% complete the 3-month follow-up. Feasibility of the implementation of the intervention will be explored in interviews with providers, clinic staff, interventionalists, and other relevant stakeholders.

Acceptability will be measured using the seven component constructs of the acceptability of health care interventions framework using a five-point Likert style scale. The seven components include affective attitude (i.e., how an individual feels about the intervention), burden, ethicality (i.e., the extent to which the intervention aligns with one's value system), intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy. Acceptability will be demonstrated if, on average, at least 75% of the participants rate five or more of the items on the eight-item Acceptability of Healthcare Interventions Questionnaire with a 4 or a 5 on the Likert-style scale. Acceptability of the intervention will also be explored in interviews with providers, clinic staff, interventionalists, and other relevant stakeholders.

This will be measured by comparing change scores from baseline to post-intervention between the intervention and TAU groups.