Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-508154-25-00 | Other Identifier | CTIS |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Takeda France | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A substantial fraction of IBD patients with an initial response to infliximab or adalimumab later experience re-emerging active disease despite ongoing anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) agents maintenance therapy. The optimal intervention in patients with secondary loss-of-response (LOR) is still poorly defined, as there are still scant data on how best to choose the next intervention from among dose-intensification, switch to another anti-TNF or switch out of the anti-TNF class. Moreover, according to STRIDE 2 recommendations and CALM study, optimize patients based solely on lack of biological remission (CRP, calprotectin) can be discuss. If CALM study has showed that the intervention arm based on regular monitoring fecal calprotectin, CRP and/or CDAI to optimize patients under adalimumab was significantly associated to an increase rate of mucosal healing that the standard of care strategy based on only clinical activity, TDM was not available to guide drug optimization strategy.
To address these issues, for IFX or ADA therapy, several studies have proposed some algorithms according to which interventions are based on a combined assessment of IFX or ADA drug level and antibodies-to-IFX or ADA (ATI or AAA) levels at the time of therapeutic failure. Thus, IFX or ADA levels, classified as therapeutic or sub-therapeutic, and detectable or undetectable antibodies, are used to assess if LOR is likely due to immunogenicity, to non-immune-mediated pharmacokinetic problems or due to pharmacodynamic issues, and to guide interventions accordingly.
In the last AGA recommendations, the authors suggested that in case of secondary LOR under anti TNF drug with therapeutic levels to switch to another class (such as vedolizumab). However, recent studies showed that optimization of dose regimen of the same anti-TNF in these patients may still be associated with clinical response in 25% of patients. Indeed, in a recent bicentric, retrospective and non-randomized study, the investigators showed that IBD patients under ADA maintenance therapy who experience a secondary loss of response and in whom trough levels are >4.9µg/mL, swapping to another class was significantly better than optimizing ADA, in term of time without discontinuation of treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab with optimisation | Experimental | Patients with Crohn's disease will be included. They will have Adalimumab with optimisation as treatment. |
|
| Vedolizumab | Experimental | Patients with Crohn's disease will be included. They will have Vedolizumab as treatment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Drug | Administration of adalimumab with optimisation either 80 mg every 14 days by subcutaneous injection, or the same dose of 40 mg every 7 days. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| ADA optimized versus Vedolizumab as second line | The primary objective will be to compare the proportion of clinical and biomarker remission (composite score) in the two groups of CD patients by 24 weeks after inclusion. | Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of deep remission | To compare the proportion of deep remissions, the composite score is :
| Weeks 0; 24 |
| Proportion of clinical remission |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathilde BARRAU, MD | Contact | (0)477829626 | +33 | mathilde.barrau@chu-st-etienne.fr |
| Sandra COURNIER, project manager | Contact | (0)477127652 | +33 | sandra.cournier@chu-st-etienne.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mathilde BARRAU, MD | CHU de Saint-Etienne | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APHP - Hôpital Bicêtre | Recruiting | Le Kremlin-Bicêtre | PARIS | 94270 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Randomization comparing 2 therapeutic strategies
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Vedolizumab | Drug | Strategy B: administration of vedolizumab 300mg by infusion at baseline, 14 days, 42 days and 60 days, followed by a dose of 108mg every fortnight by subcutaneous injection. |
|
A patient is considered to be in clinical remission if they present:
CDAI is the Crohn's disease activity score most commonly used in clinical trials. A CDAI below 150 corresponds to inactive Crohn's disease; between 150 and 450 to active Crohn's disease; above 450 to severe Crohn's disease. |
| Weeks 0; 24 |
| faecal calprotectin (microG / g) | Biomarkers are considered to be standardised if the following are observed - normalisation of faecal calprotectin: faecal calprotectin < 250 µg/g at week 24. | Week 24 |
| serum C-reactive protein (CRP) mg/l | Biomarkers are considered to be standardised if the following are observed - Normalisation of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) : serum CRP < 5 mg/L at week 24 ; | Week 24 |
| Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index score (CDEIS) | A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have: - a CDEIS score < 3 at week 24 using ileocolonoscopy ; The CDEIS is an index of the severity of intestinal lesions caused by Crohn's disease. The CDEIS ranges from 0 to 44 0: no lesions 44: most severe lesions Endoscopic remission defined by a CDEIS ≤ 7 | Week 24 |
| Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to Lewis score | A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have: - a Lewis score < 135 at week 24 in the small bowel using VCE (video endoscopy); The Lewis score analyses 5 mucosal parameters for each of the four segments of the small bowel (duodenum, jejunum, proximal and distal ileum): erythema, oedema, presence of nodular lesions, ulcerations and stenosis. A Lewis score < 135 indicates inactive disease. | Week 24 |
| Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to the number of ulcerations | A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have: - no ulceration using endoscopic video capsule (VCE) at week 24; | Week 24 |
| Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) activity | A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have: - no activity on MRI at week 24 (defined as segmental MaRIA score < 7); The MaRIA (Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity) scoring system is used to assess ileocolic Crohn's disease activity on contrast-enhanced MRI enterography. The segmental index represents the severity of disease in a segment of the bowel, while assessing six defined anatomical regions that can be combined to form an overall MaRIA index. The cut-off points for the MaRIA score are as follows: moderate disease: ≥7 severe disease: ≥11 | Week 24 |
| Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to bowel thickness | A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have: - no bowel thickness on ultrasound at week 24 (< 3mm with no other signs of activity). | Week 24 |
| Treatment failure | Compare treatment failure at week 24 or week 52 in the 2 groups. Treatment failure is defined as:
| Weeks : 24; 52 |
| Adverse events | Compare the percentage of adverse events in both arms at week 52 | Week 24 |
| Symptomatic remission at week 24 | Symptomatic remission at week 24 is a composite criterion measured by PRO2 defined as: Stool frequency (SF) < 3 with abdominal pain score (AP) < 2 at week 24; AND absence of therapeutic failure between inclusion and week 24. | Week 24 |
| Changes in quality of life score (Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)-32 | Compare evolution of IBDQ-32 in the two groups of patients between inclusion and week 24. The IBDQ-32 questionnaire consists of 32 questions. Each question is answered on a scale from 1 to 7, with 1 being the lowest score and 7 the highest. Adding up the different scores gives a total score, ranging from 32 (worst score) to 224 (best score). The higher the score, the better the quality of life. | Weeks : 0; 24 |
| Clinical and biomarker remission | Compare rates of clinical and biomarker remission at week 12 and week 52. | Weeks : 12; 52 |
| Mucosal remission | Rate of Mucosal remission at week 24. Mucosal remission is definied by ;
| Week 24 |
| Clinical Decision Support Tool (CDST) score | Analyze the CDST score for prediction of remission under vedolizumab and adalimumab optimization. A CDST score :
| Week 52 |
| Pharmacodynamic failure | Compare the efficacy of each strategy based on baseline serum ADA levels, classified into three groups: Pharmacodynamic failure: Therapeutic level of ADA in blood (> 7.5 µg/mL) Pharmacokinetic failure: Subtherapeutic level of ADA in blood (< 7.5 µg/mL) Immunogenic failure (undetectable serum ADA level with the presence of anti-ADA antibodies >50 ng/mL). | Week 52 |
| CHU Amiens | Recruiting | Amiens | 80000 | France |
|
| CHRU Lille | Recruiting | Lille | 59037 | France |
|
| Chu Limoges | Recruiting | Limoges | 87000 | France |
|
| APHM | Recruiting | Marseille | 13000 | France |
|
| CHU Montpellier | Recruiting | Montpellier | 34295 | France |
|
| Hôpital de l'Archet II | Recruiting | Nice | 06202 | France |
|
| Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris | Recruiting | Paris | 75004 | France |
|
| CHU Bordeaux | Recruiting | Pessac | 33604 | France |
|
| Ch Lyon Sud | Recruiting | Pierre-Bénite | 69230 | France |
|
| CHU Rennes | Recruiting | Rennes | 35033 | France |
|
| CHU de Saint-Etienne | Recruiting | Saint-Etienne | 42055 | France |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003424 | Crohn Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015212 | Inflammatory Bowel Diseases |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068879 | Adalimumab |
| C543529 | vedolizumab |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D061067 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
| D007162 | Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
Not provided
Not provided