Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Institut Straumann AG | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this randomized, controlled, single-center study is to compare the effects of Emdogain®, a regenerative biomaterial, on post-operative pain, wound healing and inflammation of treated sites after surgical crown lengthening. The main question it aims to answer is:
Does the use of Emdogain® in conjunction with crown lengthening surgery improve post-operative soft-tissue healing, decrease inflammation and reduce patient perception of pain compared to crown lengthening without addition of Emdogain®? The treatment group will receive Emdogain® during surgery, and the control group will undergo standard crown lengthening without Emdogain®.
This randomized, controlled, single-center study intends to investigate the effects of Emdogain® on wound healing, postoperative pain and inflammation of treated sites after crown lengthening procedures on a single site, and to compare the results of this therapy with those of standard crown lengthening treatment on a single site. We have hypothesized that the use of Emdogain® in conjunction with crown lengthening surgery improves post-operative soft-tissue healing, decreases inflammation and reduces patient perception of pain compared to crown lengthening without addition of Emdogain®. Patients were recruited from the Graduate Periodontology clinic at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto. These patients were referred to the department by dental students in the faculty as well as dentists and dental specialists within the community for crown lengthening surgery, and were subsequently screened for eligibility to participate in the study. After confirmation of eligibility and completion of recruitment, patients were randomized, using a computer-generated randomization table, into the following groups:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment/experimental group | Experimental | Patients undergoing surgical crown lengthening of a single site with application of PrefGel® + Emdogain® |
|
| Control group | Placebo Comparator | Patients undergoing surgical crown lengthening of a single site with application of PrefGel® only |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PrefGel® + Emdogain® | Device | Surgical crown lengthening procedure with root conditioning with 24% EDTA (PrefGel®) and application of 0.3 mL Emdogain® to root surface with 27-gauge needle |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinician-reported degree of inflammation | Presence and degree of inflammation (appearance of erythema/edema) using VAS score | One, two, four and eight-week follow-ups |
| Clinician-reported quality of healing | Overall healing using VAS score | One, two, four and eight-week follow-ups |
| Patient-reported perception of pain | Pain score using VAS | One, two, four and eight-week follow-ups |
| Patient-reported swelling | Swelling score using VAS | One, two, four and eight-week follow-ups |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of analgesics | Number of analgesics taken by each participant post-operatively | One, two, four and eight-week follow-ups |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients who:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Howard Tenenbaum, Dr | University of Toronto | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 1G6 | Canada |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All participants remained blinded with respect to their group assignment for the duration of the study. Allocation concealment was done by placing randomization codes with group assignment in opaque sealed envelopes that were opened by the operator at the end of the surgical procedure, right before suturing, which means the surgeon was blinded throughout most of the treatment.
Data was collected by a separate examiner who was also blinded to treatment allocation. Data analysis was carried out by an external statistician, minimizing the risk of bias.
| PrefGel® | Device | Surgical crown lengthening procedure with root conditioning with 24% EDTA (PrefGel®) |
|