Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Stuart Therapeutics, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A Phase 3 Multi-Center, Randomized, Double Masked, Vehicle Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects Diagnosed with Dry Eye Disease (DED)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ST-100-002 | Experimental | ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Bilaterally twice daily for 7 weeks (49 days) |
|
| Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution | Placebo Comparator | Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution Bilaterally twice daily for 7 weeks (49 days) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST-100 (vezocolmitide) | Drug | ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle using Schirmer's test at day 29 | Proportion of responders in Schirmer's test with ≥ 10mm improvement from baseline at Day 29 | 29 Days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of DED | Ocular Discomfort scores change from baseline at day 15 as measured by Ora Calibra Ocular Discomfort Scale | 15 Days |
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of DED |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle using additional measures | Fluorescein staining (Ora Calibra scale) at Visits 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8: regions: central, superior, inferior, temporal, nasal, corneal sum, conjunctival sum, and total eye score | 49 days |
Inclusion Criteria:
Be at least 18 years of age;
Provide written informed consent;
Have a reported history of DED for at lease 6 months prior to Visit 1;
Have a history of use or desire to use eye drops for DED within 6 months of Visit 1;
Report a score of ≥ 2 on the Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort & 4-symptom questionnaire in at least one symptom pre-CAE® at Visits 1 and 2;
Have a Schirmer's Test score of ≤ 10 mm and ≥ 1 mm at Visits 1 and 2;
Have a conjunctival redness score ≥ 1 according to the Ora Calibra® Conjunctival Redness for Dry Eye Scale in at least one eye at pre-CAE® Visits 1 and 2;
Have a corneal fluorescein staining score of ≥ 2 in at least one region (e.g. inferior, superior, or central) pre-CAE® at Visits 1 and 2;
Have a sum corneal fluorescein staining score of ≥ 4, based on the sum of the inferior, superior, and central regions pre-CAE®, at Visits 1 and 2;
Have a total lissamine green conjunctival score of ≥ 2, based on the sum of the temporal and nasal regions pre-CAE® at Visits 1 and 2;
Demonstrates a response to the CAE® at Visits 1 and 2 as defined by:
Having at least a ≥1 point increase in fluorescein staining in the inferior region in at least one eye following CAE® exposure Reporting an Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort Score ≥ 3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during CAE® exposure (if a subject has an ocular discomfort rating of 3 at a time = 0 for an eye, they must report an ocular discomfort rating of 4 for two consecutive measurements for that eye). Note: a subject cannot have an ocular discomfort score of 4 at time = 0);
Have at lease one single eye satisfy all criteria for 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 above.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Ousler | Contact | 9786858900 | 9481 | gousler@oraclinical.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Eye Care, PA | Recruiting | Memphis | Tennessee | 38119 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33882269 | Result | Baratta RO, Schlumpf E, Buono BJD, DeLorey S, Calkins DJ. Corneal collagen as a potential therapeutic target in dry eye disease. Surv Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan-Feb;67(1):60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 18. | |
| 22435675 | Result | Fiscella RG. Understanding dry eye disease: a managed care perspective. Am J Manag Care. 2011 Dec;17 Suppl 16:S432-9. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015352 | Dry Eye Syndromes |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007766 | Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Vehicle |
| Drug |
Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution |
|
Pain Score change from baseline at Day 15 |
| 15 Days |
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of DED | Blurred vision score change from baseline at day 4 as measured by OSDI | 4 days |
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of DED | Proportion of responders in Schirmer's Test with ≥ 10mm improvement from baseline at day 15 | 15 days |
| Assess the safety and tolerability of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution | Visual Acuity | 49 days |
| Assess the safety and tolerability of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution | Slit-lamp evaluation | 49 days |
| Assess the safety and tolerability of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse event monitoring | 49 days |
| Assess the safety and tolerability of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution | Intraocular pressure | 49 days |
| Assess the safety and tolerability of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution | Undilated fundoscopy | 49 days |
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle using additional measures |
Lissamine green staining (Ora Calibra scale) at Visits 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8: regions: central, superior, inferior, temporal, nasal, corneal sum, conjunctival sum, and total eye score |
| 49 days |
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle using additional measures | Tear film break-up time at Visits 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 | 49 days |
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle using additional measures | Conjunctival Redness at Visits 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 | 49 days |
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle using additional measures | Drop comfort assessment after randomization at Visit 2, 6, and 8 | 49 Days |
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle using additional measures | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Visits 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 | 49 Days |
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle using additional measures | Ocular Discomfort Scale at Visits 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 | 49 days |
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle using additional measures | Dry Eye Disease symptom questionnaire at Visits 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 | 49 days |
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle using additional measures | Blink rate at Visits 6 and 7 | 29 days |
| Compare the efficacy of ST-100 (vezocolmitide) Ophthalmic Solution 60 μg/ml Ophthalmic Solution to vehicle using additional measures | Daily Dosing Diary | 49 days |
| 26689380 | Result | Hapach LA, VanderBurgh JA, Miller JP, Reinhart-King CA. Manipulation of in vitro collagen matrix architecture for scaffolds of improved physiological relevance. Phys Biol. 2015 Dec 21;12(6):061002. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/12/6/061002. |
| 30248890 | Result | Kivanany PB, Grose KC, Yonet-Tanyeri N, Manohar S, Sunkara Y, Lam KH, Schmidtke DW, Varner VD, Petroll WM. An In Vitro Model for Assessing Corneal Keratocyte Spreading and Migration on Aligned Fibrillar Collagen. J Funct Biomater. 2018 Sep 21;9(4):54. doi: 10.3390/jfb9040054. |
| 25686388 | Result | Messmer EM. The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of dry eye disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Jan 30;112(5):71-81; quiz 82. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0071. |
| 28956287 | Result | Ousler GW 3rd, Rimmer D, Smith LM, Abelson MB. Use of the Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) in Clinical Research: A Review. Ophthalmol Ther. 2017 Dec;6(2):263-276. doi: 10.1007/s40123-017-0110-x. Epub 2017 Sep 27. |
| 26890669 | Result | Shetty R, Deshpande K, Deshmukh R, Jayadev C, Shroff R. Bowman Break and Subbasal Nerve Plexus Changes in a Patient With Dry Eye Presenting With Chronic Ocular Pain and Vitamin D Deficiency. Cornea. 2016 May;35(5):688-91. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000785. |
| 37260844 | Result | Wareham LK, Holden JM, Bossardet OL, Baratta RO, Del Buono BJ, Schlumpf E, Calkins DJ. Collagen mimetic peptide repair of the corneal nerve bed in a mouse model of dry eye disease. Front Neurosci. 2023 May 16;17:1148950. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1148950. eCollection 2023. |