Outcomes of Intra-arterial and Endosaccular Flow Diverters for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms - International Registry of Intra-arterial and Endosaccular Flow Diverters (IRF)
Outcomes of Intra-arterial and Endosaccular Flow Diverters for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms - International Registry of Intra-arterial and Endosaccular Flow Diverters (IRF)
This multicenter retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate and compare the technical performance, safety, and clinical outcomes of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverter stents and endosaccular flow disruptors.
Flow diverters and endosaccular flow disruptors used for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms exhibit distinct procedural and clinical outcomes, with potential differences in device-specific parameters such as procedure time, radiation exposure, adjunct device requirements, and long-term angiographic success. Since the completion of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) for the Intracranial Treatment of Aneurysms trial, the field of flow diversion has undergone continuous evolution with the development and approval of several devices. While these devices share a similar mechanism for aneurysm occlusion, their design and delivery systems can vary significantly. Various studies have demonstrated a promising safety and efficacy profile; however, the available data for a direct comparison of the technical and clinical outcomes between these devices remains limited.
Inclusion Criteria:
Consecutive adult patients (18 years of age or older)
Underwent endovascular treatment with one of the following devices:
a. Endoluminal Flow Diverter Stents: i. Pipeline Flex (Covidien, California, USA) ii. Pipeline Flex with Shield Technology (Covidien) iii. Surpass Streamline (Stryker Neurovascular, California, USA) iv. Surpass Evolve (Stryker) v. Silk flow diverter (Balt Extrusion, Montmorency, France) vi. Flow-Redirection Intraluminal Device (FRED; MicroVention) vii. Flow-Redirection Intraluminal Device X (FRED X; MicroVention) viii. p64 Flow Modulation Device (phenox GmbH) ix. Endovascular clip system (eCLIPs) (eCLIPsTM, eVasc Neurovascular, Vancouver, BC, Canada)
b. Intrasaccular Flow Disruptors: i. Woven EndoBridge (WEB; MicroVention) ii. Luna/Artisse System (Medtronic) iii. Medina Embolic Device (Medtronic) iv. Contour Neurovascular System (Cerus Endovascular) v. Neqstent Coil Assisted Flow Diverter (Cerus Endovascular) vi. pCONus and pCANvas (phenox GmbH) vii. Nexus Aneurysm Embolization System (EndoStream Medical) viii. CITADELâ„¢ Embolization Device (Balt, USA)
Complete medical records and follow-up data available
Exclusion Criteria:
Muhammedamir.essibayi@einsteinmed.edu347-908-1889
Coral Gables, Florida 33146, United States
RStarke@med.miami.edu305-355-1101
The Bronx, New York 10467, United States
Timo.Krings@lahey.org781-744-3330
apeterson4@mhc.net231-935-6746
collin.torok@allina.com612-863-0376
marie.meyer@allina.com
guptaga@rwjms.rutgers.edu732-235-6333
Muhammedamir.essibayi@einsteinmed.edu347-908-1889
daltschu@montefiore.org(718) 920-7498
PereiraReferrals@unityhealth.to416-864-5131
eileen.liu@unityhealth.to
pascal.mosimann@uhn.ca416-603 5800