PCORI-CDR-2022C1-26333 Promoting Shared Decision Making for Decisions About Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis (IMPACT SDM Study)
PCORI-CDR-2022C1-26333 Promoting Shared Decision Making for Decisions About Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis (IMPACT SDM Study)
The goal of this study is to increase shared decision making for patients considering treatment for severe aortic stenosis. The main questions it aims to answer are:
All participating sites will start in the usual care group and then will be randomly assigned a time to switch to the intervention group. Participants will complete surveys before and after their specialist visit.
Researchers will compare data from patients seen during usual care with data from those seen after the interventions are implemented to see if there are improvements in the quality of decisions.
The goal of this study is to promote shared decision making for patients considering treatment for severe aortic stenosis. The main questions it aims to answer are:
This study is a batched stepped wedge cluster randomized trial with 8 sites, about 56 surgeons and interventional cardiologists, and will enroll about 1300 patients. All participating sites will start in the usual care group and then will be randomly assigned a time to switch to the intervention group. The interventions include a patient decision aid that was created by the American College of Cardiology CardioSmart program and a online shared decision making skills training course for clinicians. The coordinating center will provide implementation support to sites when they transition to the intervention arm. Data collection is similar across usual care and intervention groups. Patient participants will complete surveys before and after their specialist visit. Clinician participants will be randomly selected to complete a survey after the patient visit. Limited clinical data will be collected from the medical record.
Researchers will compare data from patients seen during usual care with data from those seen after the interventions are implemented to see if there are improvements in the quality of decisions. Researchers will also calculate percentage of patients reached with decision aids and percentage of clinicians who complete training at each site to measure the success of the implementation.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
San Francisco, California 94117, United States
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-1350, United States