Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Total knee replacement is used in the treatment of patients with knee arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and other knee disorders. Today, there are basically two designs; It cuts the posterior cruciate ligament (PS) and protects the posterior cruciate ligament (CR). Although there is no clear study suggesting which design is better, research on this subject has increased recently. the investigators aim is to define the superiority of these two designs over each other. Preoperative and postoperative joint range of motion examinations were performed on both knees separately. WOMAC and OXFORD scores were examined separately for both knees.
Total knee arthroplasty is used to treat patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and other knee disorders. Today, there are basically two primary designs; posterior cruciate Substituting (PS) and protects the posterior cruciate -Retaining (CR). However, it is still controversial which approach is good, as both CR and PS have advantages and disadvantages. Proponents of the posterior cruciate retaining system argue that it provides natural stability, wider joint range of motion, better proprioception, and better knee kinematics. In addition, proponents of the posterior cruciate substituting system argue that it provides more harmonious articulation and a wider flexion range.
As a result, although there is no clear study suggesting which design is better, research on this subject has increased recently. Our aim is to define the superiority of these two designs over each other.
Patients with the same stage of knee osteoarthritis in both knees were selected. Total knee arthroplasty was performed in the same session by making the appropriate design for the appropriate knee simultaneously. Preoperative and postoperative joint range of motion examinations were performed on both knees separately. WOMAC and OXFORD scores were examined separately for both knees.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| A knee of a patient with osteoarthritis of both knees | Active Comparator | Posterior cruciate ligament protective approach in patients with knee osteoarthritis |
|
| The other knee of a patient with osteoarthritis in both knees | Active Comparator | Posterior cruciate ligament transection approach in patients with knee osteoarthritis |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| posterior cruciate ligament-retaining prostheses | Procedure | Posterior cruciate ligament protective approach in patients with knee osteoarthritis |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Range of motions | Preoperative and postoperative knee flexion and extension degrees of the patients were measured. | 3 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| WOMAC Score (Score from 0 to 100) | Preoperative and postoperative WOMAC score of the patients were examined. | 3 year |
| OXFORD Knee Score(Score from 0 to 60) | Preoperative and postoperative OXFORD score of the patients were examined. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bezmialem Vakıf University | Istanbul | Fatih | 34093 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23117166 | Background | Li N, Tan Y, Deng Y, Chen L. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Mar;22(3):556-64. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2275-0. Epub 2012 Nov 3. | |
| 20057997 | Background | Rossi R, Bruzzone M, Bonasia DE, Marmotti A, Castoldi F. Evaluation of tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Jul;18(7):889-93. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-1023-6. Epub 2010 Jan 8. |
Not provided
Not provided
I do not think it is right that the data of the patients in the study can be seen by everyone.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with the same stage of knee osteoarthritis in both knees were selected. Total knee arthroplasty was performed in the same session by making the appropriate design for the appropriate knee simultaneously. Preoperative and postoperative joint range of motion examinations were performed on both knees separately. WOMAC and OXFORD scores were examined separately for both knees.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses | Procedure | Posterior cruciate ligament transection approach in patients with knee osteoarthritis |
|
| 3 year |
| 7142239 | Background | Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH. The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Dec;64(9):1317-23. No abstract available. |
| 18951761 | Background | In Y, Kim JM, Woo YK, Choi NY, Sohn JM, Koh HS. Factors affecting flexion gap tightness in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Feb;24(2):317-21. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.022. Epub 2008 Oct 25. |
| 21909722 | Background | Chalidis BE, Sachinis NP, Papadopoulos P, Petsatodis E, Christodoulou AG, Petsatodis G. Long-term results of posterior-cruciate-retaining Genesis I total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2011 Nov;16(6):726-31. doi: 10.1007/s00776-011-0152-1. Epub 2011 Sep 10. |
| 19339558 | Background | Kim YH, Choi Y, Kwon OR, Kim JS. Functional outcome and range of motion of high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining and high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Apr;91(4):753-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00805. |