Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The use of ultrasound in clinical practice is feasible for monitoring muscle mass in critically ill patients. Assessment of muscle mass by ultrasound is clinically relevant and adds value for guiding therapeutic interventions, such as nutritional and physical therapy interventions to maintain muscle mass and promote recovery in critically ill patients.
Critical illness is characterized by substantial hormone- and cytokine-mediated protein metabolism changes in various organs, leading to increased breakdown and decreased synthesis rates. Consequently, a considerable and life-threatening loss of muscle mass occurs. Medical therapeutic measures such as long-term sedation and mechanical ventilation during ICU stay can further enhance this muscle degradation (up to 2 % muscle mass per day leading to clinically relevant symptoms known as ICU-acquired weakness. Nutritional modulation, particularly of dietary amino acids, may have benefits to prevent or attenuate disease-induced muscle wasting. while there are several accurate muscle mass measurement methods and techniques [including computed tomography (CT) scan, bio-impedance analysis and ultrasound], not all are routinely feasible in clinical ICU practice. The use of ultrasound in assessing muscle mass in critically ill patients has gained much attention recently as it is non-invasive and can easily be utilized at the bedside. There are two main goals for the assessment of muscle mass: first, to assess the current muscle mass for the patient as part of (nutritional) diagnosis, and thereby risk stratification and second, to monitor the progression of muscle loss and/or recovery of muscle mass, and create opportunity to examine the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions to reduce muscle loss and/or promote muscle recovery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Other | Group A: included (42) patients who will receive high protein intake (target: 1.8 g protein/kg body weight /d). |
|
| Control | Other | Group B: included (42) patients who will receive Standard of nutrition Care: (target: 1.2 g protein/kg body weight /d) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| protein diet | Other | this group of patients will receive high protein intake (target: 1.8 g protein/kg BW/d) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Monitoring muscle mass changes in response to high protein intake | muscle mass using ultrasound and laboratory: titre of CK (Creatinine kinase) level. | one year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| - Duration of mechanical ventilation in days. - Improvement of APACHE II score. - Duration of hospital stay in days. - Early ambulation of patients in days. - In hospital mortality. | APACHE II score is Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II: an integer score from 0 to 71 is computed based on several measurements; higher scores correspond to more severe disease and a higher risk of death |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohammad Esam, Master | Contact | +201112554609 | m92beh@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mohammad Esam, Master | Assiut University | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24108501 | Background | Puthucheary ZA, Rawal J, McPhail M, Connolly B, Ratnayake G, Chan P, Hopkinson NS, Phadke R, Dew T, Sidhu PS, Velloso C, Seymour J, Agley CC, Selby A, Limb M, Edwards LM, Smith K, Rowlerson A, Rennie MJ, Moxham J, Harridge SD, Hart N, Montgomery HE. Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness. JAMA. 2013 Oct 16;310(15):1591-600. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278481. | |
| 31725748 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Normal protein diet | Other | this group of patients will receive normal protein intake (target: 1.2 g protein/kg BW/d) |
|
| one year |
| Wandrag L, Brett SJ, Frost GS, Bountziouka V, Hickson M. Exploration of muscle loss and metabolic state during prolonged critical illness: Implications for intervention? PLoS One. 2019 Nov 14;14(11):e0224565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224565. eCollection 2019. |
| 31743123 | Background | Arabi YM, Al-Dorzi HM, Sadat M. Protein intake and outcome in critically ill patients. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2020 Jan;23(1):51-58. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000619. |
| 28832372 | Background | Brook MS, Wilkinson DJ, Atherton PJ. Nutrient modulation in the management of disease-induced muscle wasting: evidence from human studies. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2017 Nov;20(6):433-439. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000413. |
| 29847342 | Background | Looijaard WGPM, Molinger J, Weijs PJM. Measuring and monitoring lean body mass in critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018 Aug;24(4):241-247. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000511. |
| 33973896 | Background | van Ruijven IM, Stapel SN, Molinger J, Weijs PJM. Monitoring muscle mass using ultrasound: a key role in critical care. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2021 Aug 1;27(4):354-360. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000846. |
| 3928249 | Background | Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29. |
| 575168 | Result | Long CL, Schaffel N, Geiger JW, Schiller WR, Blakemore WS. Metabolic response to injury and illness: estimation of energy and protein needs from indirect calorimetry and nitrogen balance. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1979 Nov-Dec;3(6):452-6. doi: 10.1177/014860717900300609. |