Enrolling subjects intro the trial was difficult. It would not have been possible to complete the study within a reasonable timeline based on the current enrollment.

The primary goal of this study is to test the hypothesis that skeletal traction allows for easier intraoperative reduction time by comparing the reduction time in patients that receive skeletal traction for femoral shaft fracture to those that do not. Secondary goals are to assess the claims of improved pain control and decreased blood loss in patients that receive skeletal traction for femoral shaft fracture to those that do not.

Traction is a practice dating back thousands of years, historically used for the definitive treatment of femoral shaft fractures. With advances in surgical care, traction is no longer regularly used for definitive treatment. However, traction is commonly used preoperatively with the claimed benefits of fracture stabilization allowing for improved pain control, restoration of limb length with easier operative reduction, and controlling bleeding by decreasing compartmental volume. However, studies have begun to question the utility of skeletal traction in patients with femoral shaft fractures.

While pre-hospital traction splints may provide added pain control for patients with femoral shaft fractures as they are transported to the hospital, skeletal traction may not provide the same pain control benefits in the inpatient setting. Dr. Bumpass and colleagues prospectively compared patients with femoral shaft fractures placed into distal femoral traction to those that were splinted. The authors demonstrated that while patients that were splinted reported higher pain scores during application, pain scores after immobilization were not different between the two groups.

Retrospective and prospective investigations of traction for femoral shaft fractures have failed to demonstrate easier operative reduction or decreased blood loss. Koerner et al retrospectively evaluated patients with femoral shaft fractures that underwent definitive intramedullary nailing within 24 hours of presentation. The authors demonstrated no difference in blood loss, transfusion requirement, or need for open reduction between patients placed in skeletal traction and patients placed in lower extremity splints. Similarly, in their randomized controlled trial Even et al demonstrated no difference in reduction time for patients with femoral shaft fractures fixed within 24 hours that received skeletal traction or skin traction preoperatively.

To the investigator's knowledge, no study has prospectively compared surgical time, pain control, and blood loss for patients that receive preoperative skeletal traction to splinting for femoral shaft fractures that receive intramedullary nailing within 24 hours of presentation.

Skeletal traction has a long history in orthopaedic surgery for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, but may be unnecessary for patients that are surgically treated within 24 hours of presentation. The primary goal of this study is to test the hypothesis that skeletal traction allows for easier intraoperative reduction time by comparing the reduction time in patients that receive skeletal traction for femoral shaft fracture to those that do not. Secondary goals are to assess the claims of improved pain control and decreased blood loss in patients that receive skeletal traction for femoral shaft fracture to those that do not.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Any adult patient (ages 18 and over) with a femoral shaft fracture that is treated with intramedullary nailing within 24 hours of presentation

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients younger than 18
• Polytraumatized patients
• Patients with pathological fractures
• Patients with femoral shaft fracture not amenable to intramedullary nailing

No individual patient data will be shared