Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Wayne State University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Functional somatic syndromes (e.g. irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia) and medically unexplained symptoms (e.g. chronic primary pain) are very common in primary care. These patients make 14 times more doctor visits than the general population, but describe themselves as less satisfied with the care they receive. Although Region Stockholm in Sweden recently developed care flows based on 'step up' care for the most common patient groups in primary care, patients with functional or medically unexplained symptoms are not mentioned.
Short-term psychodynamic therapies such as Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy (EAET) and Intensive Short Term Psychodynamic Therapy (ISTDP) have recently been evaluated in three systematic reviews and show good results for patients with medically unexplained symptoms. Short-term psychodynamic therapy considers that good treatment outcomes for patients with functional somatic syndromes can be achieved by increasing awareness of emotions and teaching patients to better experience, express and regulate emotions. In several randomized studies, short-term psychodynamic therapy has shown good effects even compared to other treatments, including cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).
The overall purpose of this research project is to to evaluate psychodynamic emotion-focused interventions (EAET and ISTDP) for patients with medically unexplained symptoms and high health care consumption. The project includes several studies that will clarify effects and contribute to information on how care flows in primary care for the patient group can be created.
The research question for this specific study is:
Can a therapeutic interview (so-called "EAET life-stress interview") focusing on emotional factors in comparison to a psychiatric interview (so-called "basic assessment") contribute to increased interest in psychological treatment and reduction of physical and psychiatric symptoms in patients with medically unexplained symptoms with relatively high health care consumption? Does the order of interview interventions matter?
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life stress interview/therapeutic interview | Experimental | Revised "Life stress interview" according to protocol from emotional awareness and expression therapy |
|
| Psychiatric interview | Active Comparator | Psychiatric interview (M.I.N.I. etc) according to "Region stockholm - basutredning" |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life stress interview according to EAET | Behavioral | This interview has the aim to jointly explore potential emotional factors contributing to patients functional somatic symptoms. While exploring this, it has the aim to not only describe such potential patterns but also emotionally process them. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Numeric Rating Scales according to EURONET-SOMA | Visual analogue scale 0-10 for symptom intensity and symptom interference. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning. | Change from pre to follow up (6 weeks after interview) |
| PHQ-15 | Ratings 0-2 on how troublesome somatic symptoms are experienced. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning. | Change from pre to follow up (6 weeks after interview) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Numeric Rating Scales according to EURONET-SOMA | Visual analogue scale 0-10 for symptom intensity and symptom interference. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning. | Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview) |
| PHQ-15 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Peter Lilliengren, PhD | Stockholm University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stockholm University | Stockholm | 10691 | Sweden |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Psychiatric interview according to "region stockholm - basutredning" | Behavioral | This interview has the aim to gain enough information to diagnose some of the main psychiatric disorders |
|
Ratings 0-2 on how troublesome somatic symptoms are experienced. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning.
| Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview) |
| PHQ-9 | Ratings 0-3 on impact of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning. | Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview) and follow up (6 weeks after interview) |
| GAD-7 | Ratings 0-3 on impact of anxiety symptoms.Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning. | Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview) and follow up (6 weeks after interview) |
| PCL-5 | Ratings 0-4 on impact of post traumatic symptoms. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning. | Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview) and follow up (6 weeks after interview) |
| DERS-16 | Ratings on emotional (dys)regulation. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning. | Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview) and follow up (6 weeks after interview) |
| Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) | Visual analogue scale 0-10 for symptom interference in daily life. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning. | Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview) and follow up (6 weeks after interview) |
| IPQ-R | Ratings on illness beliefs. | Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview) and follow up (6 weeks after interview) |