Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to assess the extent of histopathological regression of severe cervical precancerous lesions (CIN 2 and CIN 3); evaluate the proportion of patients who experience the normalization of HPV test and cytology finding among those who were treated conservatively and those who underwent conization; and identify predictive parameters associated with regression. Based on this analysis, a model will be proposed to predict the likelihood of lesion regression.
Introduction There are three grades of dysplasia of the cervix based on their severity (CIN 1-3). Most women with CIN 2 or CIN 3 (high-grade - HG lesions) are referred for conization due to the presumed risk of developing invasive cervical cancer. However, this surgical intervention is associated with an increased risk of preterm labor in the future.
From the literature, it is evident that 30% - 60% of CIN 2 and CIN 3 lesions spontaneously regress. Colposcopic examination is a tool that can accurately assess the severity of the lesion and safely evaluate the dynamics of its development. It can be used to exclude the presence of invasive cervical cancer.
The aim of the study is to determine the absolute rate of spontaneous regression of HG lesions, considering stratification factors.
Methods Patients meeting all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria are included (see below). Colposcopic evaluations occur at four-month intervals during the study. In case of progression, the patient is indicated for conization; in case of persistence, the patient is consulted and can choose further observation or conization; in case of regression, punch biopsy is performed to acquire a histopathologic sample for primary endpoint evaluation. The biopsy/conization result is subsequently compared with the initial sample to declare regression or persistence of the HG lesion.
The HPV status and cytological findings are evaluated similarly. Stratification criteria such as age, colposcopic characteristics, HPV genotype (Cobas 4800, Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, USA), methylation markers (GynTect®, Oncgnostics GmbH, Löbstedter Str. 41, 07749 Jena, Germany), semiquantitative microscopic assessment of the vaginal swab, and personal history are assessed during monitoring.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIN 2, CIN 3 | Bioptically verified CIN 2 or CIN 3 lesion |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colposcopy | Diagnostic Test | No surgery, observation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Regression-rate of severe cervical precancerous lesions (CIN 2 and CIN 3) expressed through a comparison of initial and final histology | Histological results from the initial visit will be compared with the biopsy obtained during the last visit (or the specimen from conization) to determine whether regression or persistence of the high-grade lesion has occurred. | 3 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of HPV negativization in patients with spontaneous regression compared to patients with persistence after conization | The proportion of patients with a negative result on the HPV DNA test obtained during the final visit will be assessed. | 3 years |
| Rate of cytological normalization in patients with spontaneous regression compared to patients with persistence after conization |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Consecutive participant sampling of patients with bioptically-verified CIN 2 or CIN 3 and fully visualised squamocolumnar junction with no suspiction on invasive cancer or glandular lesion.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukas Dostalek | Contact | +420224967451 | lukas.dostalek@vfn.cz |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General University Hospital | Recruiting | Prague | 12800 | Czechia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40215795 | Derived | Dostalek L, Brynda D, Marek R, Hederlingova J, Tripac I, Nemejcova K, Slovackova M, Zima T, Cibula D, Slama J. Regression of high-grade squamous intraepithelial cervical lesions and associated risk factors (RECER). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025 May;35(5):101768. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101768. Epub 2025 Mar 13. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003127 | Colposcopy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003944 | Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D004724 | Endoscopy |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 3 years |
| Regression-rate considering specified stratification factors | Specific factors will be evaluated to determine their influence on the regression or persistence of the cervical high-grade lesion. The following factors will be assessed:
| 3 years |
| Development of a model for predicting spontaneous regression | 3 years |
| D003949 | Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical |
| D019060 | Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D013513 | Obstetric Surgical Procedures |
| D013509 | Gynecologic Surgical Procedures |
| D013519 | Urogenital Surgical Procedures |