Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Ulster | OTHER |
| European Commission | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this pilot Randomized Controlled Trial is twofold: 1) To learn about the feasibility and usefulness of a mobile application for generalised anxiety symptoms (Cerina); 2) To test the preliminary effects of Cerina in reducing generalized anxiety symptoms compared to a waitlist-control group among Ulster University students presenting mild to moderate symptoms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) symptoms. The main research questions are:
Is the Cerina app usable and feasible among Ulster University students reporting mild to moderate GAD symptoms? Is there an indication of the effectiveness of the Cerina app in reducing GAD symptoms compared to a wait-list control group among Ulster University students?
The study is a pilot Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) with two conditions: Treatment and a waitlist control group. Included eligible participants who have completed the baseline questionnaire will be randomized either into the treatment group in which they have access to the Cerina application for six weeks or into the wait-list control group in which they have access to the campus-based wellbeing services (i.e. routine care) until the intervention group completes Cerina. They will then receive access to Cerina. The randomization scheme will be derived using random allocation software by the Cerina technical lead who is not involved in the study.
All participants will be asked to fill in online self-report measures of anxiety, worrying, depression, and general functioning at baseline (t0), at 3 weeks (t1), and 6 weeks (t2). Additionally, semi-structured interviews will be conducted with the participants in both groups at 6 weeks (t2). The topic guide for the interview was developed by the Cerina team based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and it is finalized in consultation with the Principal Investigator (PI). The core topics included participants' overall experience and perceptions on the usability of the user interface of Cerina, existing pathways and barriers to using the app in daily life, the clinical utility of the application, the contexts in which the implementation of the clinical content take place and the processes of intervention delivery. The data collection will last 40 minutes, will be remote (online via the MS teams account of Ulster University), and will be facilitated by the PI and the researchers from the Ulster University. Sample size will be determined by data saturation, and sampling will be iterative to ensure theoretical saturation.
Intervention The intervention consists of 7 sessions of CBT for the treatment of anxiety and worry symptoms as part of GAD. Each session contains a range of information and tasks/exercises to help the user understand the condition of GAD, the treatment approach, and how it will apply to them. Once all sessions have been completed, the user can go back over any of the sessions. There are anxiety management exercises, which the user can go to whenever they wish. There are also a therapy reflection journal and self-care resources including further anxiety management techniques, resources, and podcasts that the user will have access to whenever they want. The names of the sessions are: Learning about GAD, dealing with worry, managing worry and anxiety, beliefs about worry, managing uncertainty, testing beliefs, review, and therapy blueprint.
Wait-list Control Condition Participants in the waiting-list control condition will have access to the campus-based well-being services offered by the Student Wellbeing team. The Wellbeing team is based on Belfast, Coleraine, and Magee campuses and provides free and confidential support and guidance to students with a broad range of issues, concerns, and challenges, to help them successfully engage in their studies. Student Wellbeing Assistants provide an initial assessment to determine a student's primary need and then Wellbeing Advisers, Student Mental Health Advisers, and Accessibility Advisers are available to provide a variety of solution-focused interventions based on that need. The Accessibility Advisers also help students with disabilities including diagnosed mental health conditions to get additional support and access funded disability support through Disabled Students' Allowance. Each campus team is led by an experienced Student Wellbeing Manager to support the advisers in the management of risk and lead to an efficient and robust response if a Clinical Incident occurs. Additionally, therapeutic counselling support is also available free to students through the external counselling provider via a dedicated 24/7 counselling helpline. The Student Wellbeing Team works closely with the counselling provider to monitor student engagement and promote the service as appropriate.
b. Statistical techniques
Sample size We seek to recruit 90 participants (N=45 in treatment, N=45 in Wait-list control) in total. The audit of the sample sizes for the pilot and feasibility RCTs indicated that the median sample size per arm across all the types of studies was 30 (Bilingham, Whitehead & Julious, 2013). Browne also recommended that 30 participants per condition are needed to estimate a parameter (Browne, 1995). We take a possible dropout rate into account and aim to include 50% more participants than initially required in both conditions.
Outcome measures:
The outcome measures are online (Qualtrics) self-report questionnaires. The primary outcome measure is anxiety symptoms measured by the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7). The secondary outcome measures are: worrying measured by the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ-PW), depression measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), general functioning measured by the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS), and usability of the intervention measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS) and semi-structured interviews.
Data analysis plan:
The recruitment and consent rates will be carefully monitored according to the CONSORT guidelines. The group allocation procedure will be monitored by the technical lead of Cerina (independent researcher). The response rates to the study questionnaires and the adherence rates will be monitored by Dr. Özlem Eylem-van Bergeijk.
Participants' views on the quality and usability of the User-Interface Design will be investigated through the SUS questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. These interviews will be audio-recorded and transcribed. The transcripts will be analyzed thematically and independently by two researchers in NVivo software.
The preliminary effects of Cerina in reducing elevated levels of anxiety and worry among students will be tested through the linear mixed models in RStudio version 3.6.1. We will compare reductions in primary/secondary outcomes between and within groups across two time points in the intention-to-treat sample, we will use linear mixed models in RStudio version 3.6.1. This method allows the number of observations to vary between participants and handles missing outcome data. The mixed model uses a longitudinal data structure that includes both fixed and random effects. Time (categorical), group (treatment v. wait-list control), and interactions between group and time will be included as fixed effects in mixed models together with a random intercept and random time effect. Differences in least-squares mean (intervention effects) at each time point with 95% confidence intervals will be derived. Cohen's d for the effect of the intervention will be estimated by calculating the difference between estimated means (corrected for baseline) divided by raw pooled standard deviation. A two-sided p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance. Missing data will be handled through multiple imputations.
We will also monitor people's help-seeking behavior throughout the study, and we will look at the differences between those who used Cerina alone compared to those who used Student Wellbeing and/or counselling services in addition to Cerina.
The reliable change index will also be used to evaluate whether participants have reliable and clinically significant change scores from baseline to post-assessment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Participants in the treatment arm will have access to Cerina for 6 weeks. The intervention (Cerina) consists of 7 sessions of Cognitive Behavioural Threapy (CBT) for the treatment of GAD. Each session contains a range of information and tasks/exercises to help the user understand the condition of GAD, the treatment approach, and how it will apply to them. |
|
| Wait-list | Active Comparator | Participants in the waiting-list control condition will have access to the campus-based well-being services offered by the Student Wellbeing team. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Device | The intervention consists of 7 sessions of CBT for the treatment of GAD. Each session contains a range of information and tasks/exercises to help the user understand the condition of GAD, the treatment approach, and how it will be applicable to them. The intervention is based on an evidence-based treatment protocol; hence the sessions will flow from one to the other and the user will complete the sessions in a progressive direction. However, they can repeat a session before going on to the next session. Once all sessions have been completed, the user can go back over any of the sessions. There are anxiety management exercises, which the user can go to whenever they wish. There are also a therapy reflection journal and self-care resources including further anxiety management techniques, resources, and podcasts that the user will have access to whenever they want. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) | GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report scale that identifies and measures the severity of GAD. Scores range from 0 to 21, with a cut-off score of 5 distinguishing between clinical and non-clinical populations. The scale has good psychometric properties | baseline, week 3 and week 6 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ-PW) | PSWQ-PW is a 15-item inventory assessing both the weekly status of pathological worry and treatment-related changes of worry during the treatment (Stöbber & Bittencourt, 1998). Each item is scored on a 7-point rating scale, ranging from never 0 (never) to 6 (almost always). The total score ranges from 0 to 90 with a high score indicating more worrying. PSWQ-PW shows good reliability and convergent validity |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ozlem Eylem-van Bergeijk, Dr | Contact | +31646136756 | oe.van.bergeijk@cerina.co | |
| Siobhan Poulter, Dr | Contact | S.Poulter@ulster.ac.uk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gerard Leavey, Prof. dr | Ulster University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ulster University | Recruiting | Belfast | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41066166 | Derived | Eylem-van Bergeijk O, Robinson T, Manktelow M, Olympios M, Poulter S, Mane P, Panagioti M, Condell J, Leavey G. Cerina-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Based Mobile App for Managing Generalized Anxiety Disorder Symptoms Among University Students: Results From a Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Oct 9;13:e70691. doi: 10.2196/70691. | |
| 38950994 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Related Info | View source |
Not provided
Anonymized data including self-reported questionnaires completed by the participants at week 3 and week 6 could be shared with other researchers who inquire the research team about an IPD meta-analysis. If this is the case, in line with the Ulster University GDPR, only anonymized data will be shared in a format which is compatible with R and/or excel for the data analysis.
The data will be available upon completion of the study (by the end of August 2024) for 10 years.
The anonymized data will only be available for IPD meta-analyses
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D000098647 | Generalized Anxiety Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study is a single-blind pilot RCT with two conditions: Treatment (i.e., access to Cerina for 6 weeks) and a waitlist control group (i.e., optional campus-based wellbeing services for 6 weeks)
Not provided
Not provided
The randomization scheme will be derived using random allocation software by the Cerina technical lead who is not involved in the study. Randomization will take place in blocks of 6, and will take place in a 1:1 ratio. All participants will be informed about the condition they are assigned to. Please see below for the study design.
|
|
| baseline, week 3 and week 6 |
| The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) | PHQ-9 is a 9-item self-report scale that measures depression symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 27, with a score of 10 and above considered to be a clinically significant level of depression. The PHQ-9 has good reliability and validity | baseline, week 3 and week 6 |
| The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) | WSAS is a 5 item self-report measure that assesses functional impairment. Scores range from 0 to 40. The scale assesses the impact on work, home, social and private activities, and personal and family relationships. A score 20 and above is considered to indicate severe functional impairment, scores between 10 and 20 suggest severe but functional impairment, and scores of 10 and less are considered subclinical. The scale has good reliability and validity | baseline, week 3 and week 6 |
| Usability | The System Usability Scale (SUS) is composed of 10 statements that are scored on a 5-point scale of the extent of agreement (score 0 to 100). The reliability is good (Cronbach's alpha 0.91). Interventions with scores of 70 and above are accepted as highly usable (Bangor et al., 2008) and scores between 50 and 70 indicate acceptable usability of an intervention. Interventions with scores of 50 and below are subject to concerns about their usability by the target population and should be investigated further. Additionally, semi-structured interviews will be conducted with the users to have more in-depth understanding of the usability of the Cerina app in real life. | week 3 and week 6 |
| Eylem-van Bergeijk O, Poulter S, Ashcroft K, Robinson T, Mane P, Islam M, Condell J, Leavey G. Cerina: cognitive-behavioural therapy-based mobile application for managing GAD symptoms among Ulster University Students in Northern Ireland - a protocol for a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 1;14(6):e083554. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083554. |
| Related Info | View source |