Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Malaria is a major public health problem. There were around 240 million cases of malaria and 627,000 deaths worldwide in 2020. Most of the deaths are in children under five living in Africa. It is a major problem for those who live in affected areas and for travellers. There is a great need for a safe, effective malaria vaccine.
This study is being done to evaluate an experimental malaria vaccine for its safety and also look at the body's immune response to the vaccine.
The vaccine tested in this study is called and "RH5.1". This is given with an adjuvant called "Matrix-M". This is a substance to improve the body's response to a vaccination.
The aim is to use the vaccines and adjuvant to help the body make an immune response against parts of the malaria parasite. This study will assess:
This will be achieved by giving participants three doses of the RH5.1 vaccines at two different dose levels (10 micrograms and 50 micrograms). One group will have 3 doses of 10 micrograms given at 0, 1 and 6 months whilst the other will receive 2 doses of 50 micrograms (at 1 and 2 months) followed by a 10 microgram dose at 6 months- known as a 'delayed fractional dose'. Blood tests and information about any symptoms will be performed/collected that occur after vaccination.
Information from previous studies suggests that a delayed fractional dose improves the immune response to the vaccine, particularly in terms of the antibody response. Current prediction is that this improvement is due to the delay in dosing, rather than the reduction in dose, and this study will help to answer that. Having a vaccine at a single dose is important for efficient production and dosing for vaccines rolled out in national programs so being able to move away from 'delayed fractional dose' regimens to 'delayed final dose' regimens will be important for vaccine development.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Delayed regimen | Experimental | 12 volunteers receiving three doses of 10 µg RH5.1 with 50 µg of Matrix-M on days 0, 28 and 182 via intramuscular (IM) injection in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm |
|
| Group 2: Delayed Fractional Regimen | Experimental | 12 volunteers receiving two doses of 50 µg RH5.1 with 50 µg of Matrix-M on days 0, 28 and one dose of 10 µg RH5.1 with 50 µg of Matrix-M on day 182 via intramuscular (IM) injection in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matrix M with RH5.1 | Biological | 50 µg of Matrix-M adjuvant with RH5.1 at different doses on days 0 and 28. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To assess the safety of RH5.1 soluble protein in Matrix-M in healthy adult volunteers by assessing the occurrence of solicited reactogenicity following each vaccinations | Occurrence of solicited local/systemic reactogenicity signs and symptoms for 7 days. following each vaccination. These will be tabulated, detailing frequency, duration and severity of signs and symptoms. | 7 days following each vaccination |
| To assess the safety of RH5.1 soluble protein in Matrix-M in healthy adult volunteers by assessing the occurrence of unsolicited adverse events following each vaccinations | Occurrence of unsolicited adverse events for 28 days following the vaccination. These will be tabulated, detailing frequency, duration and severity of AEs. | 28 days following each vaccination |
| To assess the safety of RH5.1 soluble protein in Matrix-M in healthy adult volunteers by comparing safety laboratory measures following each vaccinations | Change from baseline for safety laboratory measures for 28 days following vaccination. Haematological and biochemical laboratory values will be presented according to local grading scales. | 28 days following each vaccination |
| To assess the safety of RH5.1 soluble protein in Matrix-M in healthy adult volunteers by assessing the occurrence of serious adverse events | Occurrence of serious adverse events during the whole study duration. These will be tabulated, detailing frequency, duration and severity of SAEs. | During Whole study duration (547 days) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To assess the humoral immunogenicity of RH5.1 soluble protein with Matrix-M when administered to healthy volunteers at different doses. | Serum ELISA response, quantitative antigen-specific IgG antibody levels (µg/mL readout) over time - analysis of peak responses and longevity, with comparison before and after vaccination | From a number of key timepoints (Baseline up to day 547) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Royal Hallamshire Hospital | Sheffield | S10 2JF | United Kingdom |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008288 | Malaria |
| D016778 | Malaria, Falciparum |
| D011528 | Protozoan Infections |
| D010272 | Parasitic Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D000079426 | Vector Borne Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000096724 | Mosquito-Borne Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000625666 | Matrix-M |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| To compare the anti-RH5 serum IgG functional immunogenicity between the two groups receiving soluble RH5.1 at different doses by assessing purified IgG versus GIA titration (quality analysis) | Immunogenicity will be assessed to characterise quantity, quality and longevity of serum anti-RH5 IgG responses as measured by standardised ELISA. The growth inhibition activity will be used to determine functionality of these responses and allow quality analysis. Comparisons between two groups receiving soluble RH5.1 protein at different doses will be made post vaccination to determine how differing doses affect these responses. | After each vaccinations (D0, D28 and D182) |
| To compare differences in the innate immune responses following the first and third vaccinations and correlated these with adverse event data and adaptive immune responses | Innate immune cell analyses will include flow cytometry analyses and quantitative measurements of pro-inflammatory cytokines to phenotype innate immune cell populations primarily in the first 7 days following vaccination. | 7, 28 days following first and third vaccinations |