Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Proinnovera GmbH | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This mono-center clinical investigation is intended to assess the safety and effectiveness of THIODERM ELATE for augmentation of very thin and thin lips in comparison with Juvéderm® Ultra 3.
The Investigation is a prospective, exploratory, randomized, subject and evaluator - blinded, parallel-group, single-centre, pilot trial investigating the safety and effectiveness of THIODERM ELATE compared to Juvéderm® Ultra 3 for lip augmentation. Up to 33 eligible subjects will be included in this investigation with a 10 % estimated drop-out rate and will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to Thioderm ELATE and Juvéderm® Ultra 3, respectively, after the informed consent form (ICF) has been signed and relevant pre-treatment procedures, including medical history and pregnancy testing, as well as eligibility for inclusion have been performed. Subjects will receive injections into both, upper and lower lip using Thioderm ELATE or Juvéderm® Ultra 3 until an optimal cosmetic result is achieved. During Screening and prior to injection, the Blinded Evaluating Investigator will evaluate the lip fullness by using the 5-point Lip Fullness Scale (LFS). An optional touch-up treatment can be performed at Week 4 upon discretion of the treating investigator. The safety and effectiveness of the treatment will be evaluated after Day 1, 3 and 7 as well as at 4, 8,12, 16 and 24 weeks or an End of Study Visit using objective and subjective outcome parameters. . The same Blinded Evaluating Investigator will assess each subject at screening and at the follow-up visits.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group THIODERM ELATE | Experimental | Subjects who will receive THIODERM ELATE into upper and lower lip (66.7% of enrolled subjects) |
|
| Group JUVÉDERM ULTRA 3 | Active Comparator | Subjects who will receive JUVÉDERM ULTRA 3 into upper and lower lip (33.3% of enrolled subjects) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thioderm Elate | Device | Test Device |
| |
| Juvéderm Ultra 3 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Safety Evaluation | Treatment-emergent AEs related to study treatment. | through study completion, an average of 24 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Evaluation | Frequency, severity, and causal relationship of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) during the entire study period, including adverse device effects (ADEs) and serious adverse device effects (SADEs) | through study completion, an average of 24 weeks |
| Injection Site Reactions (ISR) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H&P Ambulatorien GmbH | Vienna | 1010 | Austria |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Parallel-Group Design with random assignment to test device or comparator device in a 2:1 ratio
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects and Evaluating Investigator will be blinded to study device assignment. The subject will be blind-folded during treatment. The Evaluating Investigator is unaware of the device assignment and has no access to study data that could potentially contain unblinding information
| Device |
Active Comparator Device |
|
Injection site reactions as recorded in the Subject diaries during the first 4 weeks (28 days) after baseline- or touch-up-treatment. Injection site reactions will be assessed overall |
| Week 1-4 (Week 1-8 in case of touch-up treatment) |
| Responder Rate Week 12 | Response measured on the 5-point LFS at Week 12 compared to baseline, based on the Blinded Evaluating Investigator's live assessment where responder is defined as a subject with a ≥1 improvement of the upper lip AND a ≥1 improvement of the lower lip | Week 12 |
| Required total Volume of Injection | Required total volume for optimum aesthetic result for treatment of the lip volume deficit at baseline and optional touch - up treatment at Week 4 of the upper and lower lip, as well as for the lip overall. | Day 0; Week 4 (in case of touch-up treatment) |
| Responder Rate | Response measured on the 5-point LFS at Day 7 and Week 4, 8, 16, 24 and End of Study compared to baseline, based on the Blinded Evaluating Investigator's live assessment where a responder is defined as a Subject with a ≥1 improvement on the upper lip AND a ≥ 1 improvement on the lower lip on the 5-point LFS | Day7; Week 4, 8, 16, and 24 and at end of study |
| Magnitude of Response Upper Lip (Investigator) | Change of 5-point LFS of the upper lip from baseline to Day 7 and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and at End of Study based on the Blinded Evaluating Investigator's live assessment | Day7; Week 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 |
| Magnitude of Response Lower Lip (Investigator) | Change of 5-point LFS of the lower lip from baseline to Day 7 and Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24and at end of study based on the Blinded Evaluating Investigator's live assessment | Day7; Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and End of Study |
| Magnitude of Response Both Lips (Investigator) | Change of 5-point LFS of the overall lip from baseline to Day 7 and Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 and at end of study based on the Blinded Evaluating Investigator's live assessment | Day7; Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and End of Study |
| Magnitude of Response Upper Lip (Independent Photo Review Panel) | Change of 5-point LFS of the upper lip from baseline to Day 7 and Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 based on the independent blinded evaluating panel's assessment | Day7; Week 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 |
| Magnitude of Response Lower Lip (Independent Photo Review Panel) | Change of 5-point LFS of the lower lip from baseline to Day 7 and Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 based on the independent blinded evaluating panel's assessment | Day7; Week 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 |
| Magnitude of Response Both Lips (Independent Photo Review Panel) | Change of 5-point LFS of the overall lip from baseline to Day 7 and Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 based on the independent blinded evaluating panel's assessment | Day7; Week 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 |
| Aesthetic Improvement (Investigator) | Aesthetic improvement based on the Blinded Evaluating Investigator's assessment at Week 4, 8,12, 16 and 24 and at end of study using the GAIS | Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and end of stidy |
| Aesthetic Improvement (Subject) | Aesthetic improvement based on the Subject's assessment at Week 4, 8,12, 16 and 24 and at end of study using the GAIS | Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and end od study |
| Lip Volume Change | Volume change of the lips at Day 7 and Week 4, 8,12, 16 and 24 and at end of study, based on 3D surface imaging in comparison to the baseline 3D image | Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and end of study |
| Subject's satisfaction (Outcome) | The extent of subject´s satisfaction with treatment of the lips at Day 1, 3, 7 and Week 4, 8,12, 16 and 24 and at ebd of study as assessed by the FACE-Q(TM) Satisfaction with Outcome Scale | Day 1, 3, 7 and Week 4, 8,12, 16, 24 and end of study |
| Subject's satisfaction (Lips) | The extent of subject´s appearance appraisal at Day 1, 3, 7 and Week 4, 8,12, 16 and 24 and at end of study as assessed by the FACE-QTM Satisfaction with Lip Scale | Day 1, 3, 7 and Week 4, 8,12, 16 24 and end of study |
| Pain Assessment | Subject´s pain assessment after each treatment on an 11-point scale, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable | Day 0; Week 4 (in case of touch-up treatment) |