Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust | OTHER |
| Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust | OTHER |
| Pari Pharma GmbH | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Research Aim: This study investigates whether a 12-month treatment with hypertonic saline (salty water) can reduce antibiotic use in individuals with neuromuscular disease or cerebral palsy who frequently experience chest infections due to difficulty clearing mucus from their airways.
Methodology: Participants will be randomly assigned to receive nebulised hypertonic saline (7% salt in water) or normal saline (0.9% salt in water). The study is open-label as both participants and researchers are aware of the treatment, necessary due to the differing tastes of the solutions. Two centers, Royal Brompton Hospital in London and Queens Medical Centre in Nottingham, will conduct the research.
Before starting the treatment, participants will undergo various assessments, including questionnaires to measure quality of life and treatment satisfaction, sputum/throat swab collection, lung clearance index, forced oscillation technique, electrical impedance tomography, and lung ultrasound. Once these assessments are completed, participants will take the assigned treatment at home, administered twice daily for 12 months, with monthly follow-ups regarding difficulties and chest infections. After 12 months, the treatment will cease, and participants will repeat the assessments.
Significance: This research will provide valuable insights into the efficacy of nebulised hypertonic saline for individuals with neuromuscular disease or cerebral palsy, potentially aiding both patients and doctors in making informed treatment decisions.
Dissemination: The study's findings will be shared through publication in scientific journals and presentation at conferences.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Nebulised 6% Hypertonic saline |
|
| Control | Placebo Comparator | Nebulised 0.9% normal saline |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| saline | Device | nebulised |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Course of antibiotics for respiratory infections | Full courses of antibiotics as prescribed for respiratory infections, both oral and intravenous, (excluding prophylactic antibiotic prescriptions). 1 course of antibiotic would be the full treatment for one event of respiratory infection, irrespective of the number of days that the course was prescribed for. | from baseline to week 52 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lung clearance index | measured by multiple breath washout | at baseline before and within 2 hours after drug response assessment, and at week 52. |
| Forced oscillation technique | Respiratory resistance (Rrs) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment rate | Number of participants recruited per centre per month. | 1 year |
| Consent rate | Percentage of eligible participants who consented and were randomised. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia G Galaz Souza | Contact | 0787131892 | natalia.galaz-souza16@imperial.ac.uk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Bush, Professor | Imperial College London | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royal Brompton Hospital | London | SW3 6NP | United Kingdom |
Data ownership rights will lie with the institution
Data will become available after all study activities have finished. It will be available for 10 years.
Data ownership rights will lie with the institution
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D065886 | Neurodevelopmental Disorders |
| D002547 | Cerebral Palsy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D001925 | Brain Damage, Chronic |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| at baseline before and within 2 hours after drug response assessment, and at week 52. |
| Forced oscillation technique | Respiratory reactance (Xrs). | at baseline before and within 2 hours after drug response assessment, and at week 52. |
| Lung ultrasound | Global Lung ultrasound score. The global lung ultrasound score (LUS) quantifies lung aeration by translating lung ultrasound patterns into a numerical score across 12 lung regions (six areas on each side of the chest: two ventral regions, two lateral regions, and two posterolateral regions) and summing the results. The aeration pattern observed in each region is scored from 0 to 3 as follows: 0 = A pattern with ≤2 B lines; 1 = >2 separated B lines that cover ≤50% of the pleural line; 2 = B lines that cover >50% of the pleural line; or 3 = lung consolidation. In theory, the global LUS score can range from 0 (normal aeration in all regions) to 36 (severe abnormal aeration in all regions). | at baseline before and within 2 hours after drug response assessment, and at week 52. |
| Electrical Impedance Tomography | Electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-based global inhomogeneity index (quantification of homogeneity of the tidal volume distribution). The image matrix in EIT consists of 32 × 32 pixels. Global inhomogeneity (GI) is calculated as the sum of the absolute differences between the median value of tidal variation and every single pixel value, divided by the sum of all impedance values, to normalise the calculated values.The smaller the GI, the more homogeneous the tidal volume is distributed within the ventilated area. A GI of zero represents a perfectly homogeneous distribution of ventilation. | at baseline before and within 2 hours after drug response assessment, and at week 52. |
| Airway inflammation | Levels of IL-8 in sputum or throat swab. | baseline and at week 52 |
| Airway inflammation | Levels of IL-6 in sputum or throat swab. | baseline and at week 52 |
| Airway inflammation | Levels of TNF-a in sputum or throat swab. | baseline and at week 52 |
| Airway inflammation | Levels of IL-1b in sputum or throat swab. | baseline and at week 52 |
| Bacterial diversity | Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) Richness, defined as count of different species/OTUs. | baseline and at week 52 |
| Bacterial diversity | Pielou's eveness index. Pielou's evenness is an index that measures diversity along with species richness. | baseline and at week 52 |
| Bacterial diversity | Shannon diversity index. The index takes into account the number of species living in a habitat (richness) and their relative abundance (evenness). | baseline and at week 52 |
| Bacterial diversity | Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index. Examines the abundances of microbes that are shared between two samples, and the number of microbes found in each. | baseline and at week 52 |
| Ease of airway clearance | 0-10 Visual analogue scale, where 0 is most easy, and 10 is most difficult. | Once monthly for 52 weeks. |
| Health-related quality of life | Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)™. 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better HRQOL (Health-Related Quality of Life). | At baseline and at week 51. |
| Patient and main carer treatment satisfaction | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM Version 1.4). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction. | weeks 12, 26, 39 and 51 |
| Family impact | PedsQL™ Family Impact Module. The scale has five Likert response options, 'never', 'almost never', 'sometimes', 'often' and 'almost always' (corresponding to scores of 100, 75, 50, 25 and 0). Regarding the interpretation of the scale, higher scores indicate better functioning (less negative impact). | Baseline and at week 51. |
| Health economics | Quality-adjusted life years | baseline, week 26 and week 51. |
| 1 year |
| Retention rate | Percentage of randomised participants retained with valid primary outcome data. | 1 year |
| Adherence | Mean percentage of adherence calculated from returned ampoules count | 52 weeks |
| Adherence | Pick-up rate as the percentage of picked up prescriptions from total prescribed doses | 52 weeks |
| Adherence | The Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS) Score, where each of the 5 items are summed to give a scale score ranging from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate higher levels of reported adherence. | 52 weeks |
| Compliance with monthly follow-up | Percentage of compliance with completion of monthly questionnaires. | 52 weeks |
| Success rates of outcome measures | Percentage of participants who provided a sputum sample or throat swab | 1 year |
| Success rates of outcome measures | Percentage of participants who completed acceptable measurements of Lung clearance index | 1 year |
| Success rates of outcome measures | Percentage of participants who completed acceptable measurements of Forced oscillation technique | 1 year |
| Success rates of outcome measures | Percentage of participants who completed acceptable measurements of Lung ulstrasound | 1 year |
| Success rates of outcome measures | Percentage of participants who completed acceptable measurements of Electrical impedance tomography | 1 year |
| Time required to complete outcome measures | Time in minutes to complete acceptable measurements of Lung clearance index | 2 hours |
| Time required to complete outcome measures | Time in minutes to complete acceptable measurements of forced oscillation technique | 2 hours |
| Inter-rater reliability of Lung ultrasound analysis | Degree of agreement among independent observers using Cohen Kappa. Cohen suggested the Kappa result be interpreted as follows: values ≤ 0 as indicating no agreement and 0.01-0.20 as none to slight, 0.21-0.40 as fair, 0.41- 0.60 as moderate, 0.61-0.80 as substantial, and 0.81-1.00 as almost perfect agreement. | 1 year |
| Inter-rater reliability of Electrical impedance tomography analysis | Degree of agreement among independent observers using Cohen Kappa. Cohen suggested the Kappa result be interpreted as follows: values ≤ 0 as indicating no agreement and 0.01-0.20 as none to slight, 0.21-0.40 as fair, 0.41- 0.60 as moderate, 0.61-0.80 as substantial, and 0.81-1.00 as almost perfect agreement. | 1 year |
| Nottingham University Hospitals | Nottingham | NG7 2UH | United Kingdom |
|
| D002493 |
| Central Nervous System Diseases |