Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Proinnovera GmbH | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This mono-center clinical investigation is intended to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of THIODERM STRONG (test device) in the correction of moderate to severe midface volume deficit compared to Juvéderm® VOLUMA® Lidocaine (comparator device).
The Investigation is an exploratory, prospective, randomized, subject and evaluator-blinded, split- face, single-centre study investigating the effectiveness and safety of THIODERM STRONG compared to Juvéderm® VOLUMA® Lidocaine for the treatment of moderate to severe midface volume deficit. 20 eligible Subjects will be included in this investigation, after the informed consent form (ICF) has been signed and relevant pre-treatment procedures, including medical history and pregnancy testing, have been performed. Subjects will receive injection in the midface region using THIODERM STRONG and Juvéderm® VOLUMA® Lidocaine until an optimal aesthetic result is achieved. The Blinded Evaluating Investigator will determine severity of the Subject's midface volume deficit using the 5-point MVDSS throughout the investigation (Baseline to Week 24). Baseline is defined as the assessment prior to administration of the IMDs. The same Investigator will assess the Subject using the 5-point MVDSS at all visits. An optional touch-up treatment can be performed at Week 4 upon discretion of the Unblinded Treating Investigator. The effectiveness and safety of the treatment will be evaluated after Day 1, 3 and 7 as well as at 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks using objective and subjective outcome parameters. An interim analysis will be performed when all Subjects have completed the visit at Week 8.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group THIODERM LEFT | Other | Split Face Design: Test Device left midface and Comparator Device right midface |
|
| Group JUVÈDERM LEFT | Other | Split Face Design: Test Device right midface and Comparator Device left midface |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thioderm Strong | Device | Test Device |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Response Magnitude | To assess the effectiveness of THIODERM STRONG in reducing the severity of the midface volume deficit in comparison with Juvéderm® VOLUMA® Lidocaine based on Blinded Evaluating Investigator assessment at Week 24 as measured via the 5-point Midface Volume Deficit Severity Scale (MVDSS). | 24 Weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume Injected | To assess required total volume for optimum aesthetic result for THIODERM STRONG compared to Juvéderm® VOLUMA® Lidocaine. | 24 Weeks |
| Response Rate | To assess the proportion of responders after treatment with THIODERM STRONG in comparison with Juvéderm® VOLUMA® Lidocaine per treated side. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Evaluation | Frequency, severity and causal relationship of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) during the entire study period, including adverse device effects (ADEs) and serious adverse device effects (SADEs). | through study completion, an average of 24 weeks |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alice Krames-Juerss | CROMA Pharma GmbH (Sponsor) | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H&P Ambulatorien GmbH | Vienna | 1010 | Austria |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Split-Face Design with random assignment of test device and comparator device to be injected either into right or into left Mid Face Area
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects and Evaluating Investigator will be blinded to study device assignment. The subject will be blind-folded during treatment. The Evaluating Investigator is unaware of the device assignment and has no access to study data that could potentially contain unblinding information
| Juvéderm VOLUMA Lidocaine |
| Device |
Comparator Device |
|
| Day7; Week 4, 8, 16, and 24 |
| Response Magnitude | To assess the change on the 5-point MVDSS from baseline after treatment with THIODERM STRONG in comparison with Juvéderm® VOLUMA® Lidocaine. | Day 7; Week 4, 8, and 16 |
| Response Magnitude Photographic Review | Change of 5-point MVDSS from baseline to Day 7 and Week 4, 8, 16 and 24 based on the independent blinded evaluating panel's assessment per treated side. | Day7; Week 4, 8, 16, and 24 |
| Aesthetic Improvement via GAIS - Investigator | Aesthetic improvement based on the Blinded Evaluating Investigator's assessment per treated side at Week 4, 8, 16 and 24 using the GAIS. | Day7; Week 4, 8, 16, and 24 |
| Aesthetic Improvement via GAIS - Subject | Aesthetic improvement based on the Subject's assessment per treated side at Week 4, 8, 16 and 24 using the GAIS | Day7; Week 4, 8, 16, and 24 |
| Volume Change via 3D Imaging | Volume change of the midface region at Day 7 and Week 4, 8, 16 and 24, based on 3D surface imaging in comparison to the baseline 3D surface image per treated side. | Day7; Week 4, 8, 16, and 24 |
| Subject Satisfaction - Face-Q(TM) Outcome Scale | The extent of Subject´s satisfaction with treatment of the midface at Day 1, 3, 7 and Week 4, 8, 16 and 24 as assessed by the FACE-QTM Satisfaction with Outcome Scale per treated side. | Day 1, 3, and 7; Week 4, 8, 16, and 24 |
| Subject Appearance Appraisal - Face-Q(TM) Satisfaction with Cheeks | The extent of Subject´s appearance appraisal at Day 1, 3, 7 and Week 4, 8, 16 and 24 as assessed by the FACE-QTM Satisfaction with Cheeks Scale per treated side and compared to the score at screening. | Day 1, 3, and 7; Week 4, 8, 16, and 24 |
| Change of Nasolabial Fold Severity | Change of nasolabial fold severity measured by NLF-SRS from baseline to Day 7 and Week 4, 8, 16 and 24 based on the Blinded Evaluating Investigator's assessment per treated side. | Day7; Week 4, 8, 16, and 24 |
| Pain Assessment | Subject´s pain assessment after each treatment on an 11-point scale, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable per treated side. | Day 0; Week 4 (in case of touch-up treatment) |