Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this research study is to study cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) to determine its effects on symptoms of anxiety in people with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) between the ages of 18 - 21 years of age.
This study examines (1) the efficacy of CES with the Alpha-Stim AID ® for the treatment of GAD in young adults (18-21 years of age) in a double-blind, sham-controlled parallel group single-site clinical trial of 130 participants.
Participants will be randomized into receiving either active CES (at least 200uA, up to 500uA at 0.5Hz, 60 minutes daily for six weeks) or sham CES with the Alpha-Stim AID ® device at-home. Clinical assessments of anxiety symptoms are performed at Screening (for eligibility), Baseline, Follow-Up 1 (at completion of intervention, 6 weeks after initial stimulation), and Follow-Up 2 (12 weeks after initial stimulation). Additional assessments of depression symptoms and quality of life are included. Resting-state EEG will be collected at baseline and Follow-Up 1 (in up to 60 participants) for exploratory investigation of mechanism of action.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) | Experimental | Alpha-Stim AID ® is an FDA-cleared device for the treatment of anxiety that delivers CES through two earclip electrodes. |
|
| Sham Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) | Sham Comparator | The device for sham stimulation is physically identical and delivers a non-therapeutic dose of stimulation to replicate salient features of device usage. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| At-Home Stimulation | Device | The stimulation paradigm in this trial consists of six weeks of daily, 60-minute at-home stimulation sessions. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) change | Change in HAM-A between six-week follow-up (FU1) and baseline (D1); minimum value is 0, maximum value is 56. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | 42 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) change | Change in HAM-A between twelve-week follow-up (FU2) and D1; minimum value is 0, maximum value is 56. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | 84 days |
| Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) Change |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Time-frames are determined relative to the screening visit.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Samantha Meltzer-Brody, MD | University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carolina Center for Neurostimulation | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27516 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24856571 | Background | Barclay TH, Barclay RD. A clinical trial of cranial electrotherapy stimulation for anxiety and comorbid depression. J Affect Disord. 2014 Aug;164:171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.04.029. Epub 2014 Apr 21. | |
| 26487813 | Background | Bandelow B, Michaelis S. Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015 Sep;17(3):327-35. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2015.17.3/bbandelow. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Link to more information and study recruitment for interested potential participants. | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000098647 | Generalized Anxiety Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Change in BAI between FU1 and D1; minimum value is 0, maximum value is 63. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
| 42 days |
| Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) Change | Change in BAI between FU2 and D1; minimum value is 0, maximum value is 63. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | 84 days |
| Generalized-Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Change | Change in GAD-7 between FU1 and D1; minimum value is 0, maximum value is 21. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | 42 days |
| Generalized-Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Change | Change in GAD-7 between FU2 and baseline D1; minimum value is 0, maximum value is 21. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | 84 days |
| Response/Remission of anxiety | Response/remission rates based on HAM-A scores from FU1 versus baseline D1 | 42 days |
| Response/Remission of anxiety | Response/remission rates based on HAM-A scores from FU2 versus baseline D1 | 84 days |
| Change in Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) | Change in CGI from FU1 to D1; CGI scale contains two scoring components, 1) Severity of Illness (0-7) and 2) Global Improvement (0-7). Higher scores in component 1 indicate worse symptoms while higher numbers in component 2 indicate worse clinical outcomes. | 42 days |
| Change in Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) | Change in CGI from FU2 to baseline D1; CGI scale contains two scoring components, 1) Severity of Illness (0-7) and 2) Global Improvement (0-7). Higher scores in component 1 indicate worse symptoms while higher numbers in component 2 indicate worse clinical outcomes. | 84 days |
| Change in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, short form (Q-LES-Q-SF) | Change in Q-LES-Q-SF from FU1 to D1; minimum value is 14, maximum value is 70. Higher scores indicate better outcome. | 42 days |
| Change in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, short form (Q-LES-Q-SF) | Change in Q-LES-Q-SF from FU2 to D1; minimum value is 14, maximum value is 70. Higher scores indicate better outcome. | 84 days |
| 32905958 | Background | Goodwin RD, Weinberger AH, Kim JH, Wu M, Galea S. Trends in anxiety among adults in the United States, 2008-2018: Rapid increases among young adults. J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Nov;130:441-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Aug 21. |
| 34920039 | Background | Hajek A, Sabat I, Neumann-Bohme S, Schreyogg J, Barros PP, Stargardt T, Konig HH. Prevalence and determinants of probable depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in seven countries: Longitudinal evidence from the European COvid Survey (ECOS). J Affect Disord. 2022 Feb 15;299:517-524. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.029. Epub 2021 Dec 15. |
| 33424664 | Background | Garakani A, Murrough JW, Freire RC, Thom RP, Larkin K, Buono FD, Iosifescu DV. Pharmacotherapy of Anxiety Disorders: Current and Emerging Treatment Options. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 23;11:595584. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.595584. eCollection 2020. |