Intérêt de la rééducation érectile précoce Par Sildénafil après radiothérapie et Proctectomie Pour Cancer du Rectum : Essai contrôlé randomisé
Intérêt de la rééducation érectile précoce Par Sildénafil après radiothérapie et Proctectomie Pour Cancer du Rectum : Essai contrôlé randomisé
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of erectile rehabilitation with Sildenafil, in men treated with neoadjuvant proctectomy and radiotherapy for rectal cancer, in preventing long-term erectile dysfunction at 12 months post-operatively.
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men in France, after lung and prostate cancer. Proctectomy (possibly preceded by radiotherapy) is the most effective treatment for this cancer, but erectile dysfunction (ED) is a frequent complication, even when the nerves are preserved during dissection, and has a major impact on the quality of life of operated men.
The cause of erectile dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery is usually neurological, due to intraoperative trauma to the autonomic nerves, while erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy is mainly vascular in origin, with damage to erectile tissue.
Several risk factors for sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery have been reported (age, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, type of resection, operative difficulties and complications, body image affected by protective stoma). On the other hand, surgical expertise may be a protective factor.
In the physiological condition, the nitric oxide released by the pelvic nerves causes an increase in cyclic guanosine monophosphate, which in turn causes smooth muscle cells relaxation and an influx of blood into the cavernous body, triggering and maintaining the erection.
Similar to prostatectomy, nerve damage can occur during proctectomy through stretching, heat, ischemia or inflammation; this nerve damage results in reduced nitric oxide production.
Even in the absence of nerve damage, it has been demonstrated (in an animal model) that post-operative neurapraxia is responsible for the at least temporary disappearance of spontaneous and nocturnal erections, leading to cavernous hypoxia. This is followed by tissue changes (reduction in smooth and elastic muscle fibers in the corpora cavernosa, increase in collagen and endothelial dysfunction), which modify the hemodynamics of the carvernum body and ultimately lead to fibrosis of the erectile tissue.
These changes can become permanent despite subsequent nerve recovery, and are exacerbated by neoadjuvant radiotherapy. It is therefore important not to wait passively for erectile function to be restored, as lack of oxygenation to the corpora cavernosa can lead to permanent fibrosis and dysfunction.
This physiopathology is at the origin of the concept of erectile rehabilitation after prostatectomy, with the aim of maintain erections post-operatively and thus limiting fibrosis.
The benefits of erectile re-education after prostatectomy were first reported in 1997, with the early use of intracavernous injections of alprostadil. Following this study, various rehabilitation strategies have been recommended. Early treatment, i.e. within the first month, is recommended to promote cavernous oxygenation and prevent fibrosis.
The aims of rehabilitation are as follows :
Various types of rehabilitation have been proposed: oral PDE-5 inhibitors, intra-cavernosal injections, urethral suppositories or vaccum.
PDE-5 inhibitors prevent the degradation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate, thus compensating for the reduction in nitric oxide and enabling a better erection.
Erectile rehabilitation using PDE-5 inhibitors could protect cavernous smooth muscle from irreversible pathophysiological changes. The basic concept is to administer a PDE-5 inhibitor at bedtime to facilitate nocturnal erections, which are thought to have a natural protective effect on the function of the cavernous bodies.
Padma-Nathan et al. reported the prospective administration of sildenafil 50 and 100 mg vs. placebo, daily and at bedtime, in patients undergoing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. After 36 weeks, erectile function was significantly better in the sildenafil group, with 27% responders, vs. 4% in the placebo group.
The mechanisms involved in erectile dysfunction after proctectomy for rectal cancer are similar to those of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
The efficacy of PDE-5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction after proctectomy has already been demonstrated. However, its use as a preventive measure has rarely been reported.
Three studies have evaluated PDE-5 inhibitors in patients with erectile dysfunction after rectal resection, two of which used sildenafil (Viagra, Pfizer, New York, NY)
To our knowledge, only one study has evaluated the role of PDE-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) in a preventive strategy.
Originality and innovation Despite the fact that sexual dysfunction is recognized as a frequent complication of rectal cancer treatment, there are currently no recommendations for its prevention and management.
In contrast to prostate cancer patients, information and treatment concerning erectile dysfunction (ED) are not systematically offered to men with colorectal cancer. The ability of sildenafil to facilitate the return of erections after radical prostatectomy has been demonstrated in several studies, and this treatment could benefit patients treated for rectal cancer.
To date, no randomized study has examined the usefulness of this early rehabilitation in patients managed for rectal cancer. This study proposes, for the first time, to evaluate the use of sildenafil after neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
valerie.bridoux@chu-rouen.fr0232881347 ext. +33
julie.rondeaux@chu-rouen.fr0232885427 ext. +33
Amiens, 80054, France
Sabbagh.charles@chu-amiens.fr03 22 08 88 93
f.mauvais@ch-beauvais.fr03 44 11 26 26
zlakkis@chu-besancon.fr03 81 66 93 44
stephane.benoist@aphp.fr01 45 21 70 30
benjamin.fernandez@chu-bordeaux.fr05 56 79 58 10
q.denost@bordeaux-colorectal-institute.fr05 47 50 15 75
a_dubois@chu-clermontferrand.fr04 73 75 05 32
guillaume.piessen@chru-lille.fr03 20 44 44 07
dazzam@ipc.unicancer.fr06 83 32 41 77
Philippe.Rouanet@icm.unicancer.fr04 67 61 30 71
jeremie.lefevre@aphp.fr01 49 28 26 87
mehdi.karoui@aphp.fr01 56 09 35 34
julien.coget@chu-rouen.fr02 32 88 82 83
m.ouaissi@chu-tours.fr02 18 37 05 75