Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most common surgery in North America and the second most common in Europe. One of the most critical issues for stability and durability of the interventional is the prosthesis-bone geometric fit, where a required a perfect match; the recent availability of custom 3D implants can overcome this problem. In order to further improve a TKA surgery, it is in fact, it is possible today to completely customize the procedure for each individual patient, with cost and time now accessible. This intervention can be performed with the use of instrumentation specific to the patient (so-called resin 'cutting templates' referred to as PSI, "Patient Specific Instrumentation") to make cuts accurate bone cuts in accordance with a specific 3D preoperative plan . Also the design and fabrication in of the components prosthetic components themselves, in metal and polyethylene, is done by means of 3D printing. Based on the unique anatomy of each patient, the precise sagittal orientation and axial rotation of the components of the prosthesis customized for the surgeon, it is possible to plan and perform the surgery quickly and in accordance with the exact specifications of the individual patient. These procedures should also make it possible to greatly reduce the instrumentation and the sizes that need to be available in the operating room, reducing time and costs associated with transportation and storage . The objective of this study is to compare primary TKAs performed with a customized procedure (prostheses customized for each patient based on his or her reconstructed knee morphology by tomographic scans, and implanted via cutting guides customized for the patient) with standard primary TKAs, considering: the objective radiological results, the subjective results of the patients and the costs of both procedures.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| CUSTOM | Experimental | patients will undergo primary TKA by implanting a prosthetic model (YourKnee, Rejoint) with a design specifically based on each patient's real knee morphology and using PSI surgical technique and instrumentation. |
|
| TRADITIONAL | Active Comparator | patients will undergo a primary TKR by implanting a prosthetic model of the same standard design for all using the usual surgical technique and instrumentation (based on the use of the guided intramedullary femur and extramedullary tibia). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| total knee arthroplasty | Procedure | In detail, in the STANDARD group, patients will undergo a primary TKR by implanting a prosthetic model of the same standard design for all using the usual surgical technique and instrumentation (based on the use of guide intramedullary of femur and extramedullary of tibia); in the PERSONALIZED group, patients will undergo a primary TKA by implanting a prosthetic model (YourKnee, Rejoint) with design based specifically on each patient's actual knee morphology and using PSI surgical technique and instrumentation. In both groups, the approach of the basic prosthetic design base will be of the Cruciate-Retaining (CR) type with congruent polyethylene (PE), with standard and customized for the STANDARD and CUSTOM group, respectively. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Angle Hip Knee Ankle | Evaluate by how many degrees the angle HKA (angle obtained by joining the center of rotation of the knee with that of the hip and ankle) planned (desired value) differs from that measured postoperatively (obtained value) When implanting a customized primary TKA (PERSONALIZED group) vs. a standard primary TKA (STANDARD group) according to normal surgical practice. | at baseline (day 0) |
| Angle Hip Knee Ankle | Evaluate by how many degrees the angle HKA (angle obtained by joining the center of rotation of the knee with that of the hip and ankle) planned (desired value) differs from that measured postoperatively (obtained value) When implanting a customized primary TKA (PERSONALIZED group) vs. a standard primary TKA (STANDARD group) according to normal surgical practice. | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual analogic scale | The VAS scale is an objective method of pain measurement | at baseline (day 0) |
| Visual analogic scale | The VAS scale is an objective method of pain measurement |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| giulio maria marcheggiani muccioli, PHD | Contact | 0516366 | 122 | giuliomaria.marcheggianimuccioli@ior.it |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli | Recruiting | Bologna | 40136 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29598886 | Result | Lubbeke A, Silman AJ, Barea C, Prieto-Alhambra D, Carr AJ. Mapping existing hip and knee replacement registries in Europe. Health Policy. 2018 May;122(5):548-557. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Mar 17. | |
| 28122388 | Result | Qiu B, Liu F, Tang B, Deng B, Liu F, Zhu W, Zhen D, Xue M, Zhang M. Clinical Study of 3D Imaging and 3D Printing Technique for Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2017 Oct;30(8):822-828. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597980. Epub 2017 Jan 25. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019645 | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019643 | Arthroplasty, Replacement |
| D001178 | Arthroplasty |
| D019637 | Orthopedic Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| after 3 months |
| Visual analogic scale | The VAS scale is an objective method of pain measurement | after 6 months |
| Visual analogic scale | The VAS scale is an objective method of pain measurement | after 12 months |
| Visual analogic scale | The VAS scale is an objective method of pain measurement | after 24 months |
| New Knee Society Score | The KSS contains questions in 2 sections: knee joint (pain, range of motion, stability) and function (walking distance, ability to climb stairs). When calculating the score, deductions are taken for assistive devices and flexion contractures, misalignment, or extension lag. | at baseline (Day 0) |
| New Knee Society Score | The KSS contains questions in 2 sections: knee joint (pain, range of motion, stability) and function (walking distance, ability to climb stairs). When calculating the score, deductions are taken for assistive devices and flexion contractures, misalignment, or extension lag. | after 3 months |
| New Knee Society Score | The KSS contains questions in 2 sections: knee joint (pain, range of motion, stability) and function (walking distance, ability to climb stairs). When calculating the score, deductions are taken for assistive devices and flexion contractures, misalignment, or extension lag. | after 6 months |
| New Knee Society Score | The KSS contains questions in 2 sections: knee joint (pain, range of motion, stability) and function (walking distance, ability to climb stairs). When calculating the score, deductions are taken for assistive devices and flexion contractures, misalignment, or extension lag. | after 12 months |
| New Knee Society Score | The KSS contains questions in 2 sections: knee joint (pain, range of motion, stability) and function (walking distance, ability to climb stairs). When calculating the score, deductions are taken for assistive devices and flexion contractures, misalignment, or extension lag. | after 24 months |
| Knee injury & Osteoarthritis Outcome Score | The KOOS is self-administered and assesses five outcomes: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life | at baseline (Day 0) |
| Knee injury & Osteoarthritis Outcome Score | The KOOS is self-administered and assesses five outcomes: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life | after 3 months |
| Knee injury & Osteoarthritis Outcome Score | The KOOS is self-administered and assesses five outcomes: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life | after 6 months |
| Knee injury & Osteoarthritis Outcome Score | The KOOS is self-administered and assesses five outcomes: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life | after 12 months |
| Knee injury & Osteoarthritis Outcome Score | The KOOS is self-administered and assesses five outcomes: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life | after 24 months |
| Forgotten Joint Score | a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment | at baseline (day 0) |
| Forgotten Joint Score | a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment | after 3 months |
| Forgotten Joint Score | a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment | after 6 months |
| Forgotten Joint Score | a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment | after 12 months |
| Forgotten Joint Score | a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment | after 24 months |
| 34652517 | Result | Brinkmann EJ, Fitz W. Custom total knee: understanding the indication and process. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Dec;141(12):2205-2216. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04172-9. Epub 2021 Oct 15. |
| 22045067 | Result | Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN. The new Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):3-19. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2135-0. No abstract available. |
| D012216 |
| Rheumatic Diseases |
| D019651 | Plastic Surgery Procedures |
| D019919 | Prosthesis Implantation |