Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2023-10532 | Other Identifier | NCI CTRP |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to assess the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of a educational video series for patients going through breast cancer treatment.
This is a prospective, mixed methods pilot study to evaluate the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of a novel educational video series for patients going through breast cancer treatment. The video series addresses topics such as what to expect from breast surgery, how to prepare for breast surgery, treatment effects of breast cancer therapies, and mitigation and communication strategies for navigating breast cancer treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video website access | Experimental | Participants will gain access to the educational video website in order to watch the series. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Educational video series | Other | The intervention is a web-based educational video series that was developed using a patient-centered approach that discusses breast cancer treatment, sexual health side effects, and provides treatment and mitigation strategies for these side effects. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability of the educational video series after six-months of access and use by breast cancer patients as measured by AIM instrument. | The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) is a validated instrument used to measure the acceptability of an intervention. Scores range from 0-5. There is no score cut off, however higher scores indicate better outcomes (greater acceptability). | 6 months |
| Appropriateness of the educational video series after six-months of access and use by breast cancer patients as measured by IAM instrument. | The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) is a validated instrument used to measure the appropriateness of an intervention. Scores range from 0-5. There is no score cut off, however higher scores indicate better outcomes (greater appropriateness). | 6 months |
| Determine the sustainability of the educational video series after six-months of access and use by breast cancer patients as measured by the FIM instrument. | The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) is a validated instrument used to measure the feasibility, or sustainability, of an intervention. Scores range from 0-5. There is no score cut off, however higher scores indicate better outcomes (greater feasibility). | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline in sexual health and function at six-months, as measured by the PROMIS Sexual Function v2 Brief Profile (Female) | The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sexual Function v2 Brief Profile (Female) is a well-validated tool in oncology patients to assess sexual health. Calibrated subdomain scores are expressed as T-scores (mean=50, standard deviation=10). A T-score 50 corresponds to the mean response among cancer survivors used for previous item testing. Higher scores indicate better outcomes within the domain. We will assess the change at 6 months from baseline. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sarah E Tevis, MD | University of Colorado, Denver | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Colorado Health | Aurora | Colorado | 80045 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27492424 | Background | Tat S, Doan T, Yoo GJ, Levine EG. Qualitative Exploration of Sexual Health Among Diverse Breast Cancer Survivors. J Cancer Educ. 2018 Apr;33(2):477-484. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1090-6. | |
| 25534170 | Background | Sporn NJ, Smith KB, Pirl WF, Lennes IT, Hyland KA, Park ER. Sexual health communication between cancer survivors and providers: how frequently does it occur and which providers are preferred? Psychooncology. 2015 Sep;24(9):1167-73. doi: 10.1002/pon.3736. Epub 2014 Dec 22. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012735 | Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological |
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Baseline, 6 months |
| 12618871 | Background | Stead ML, Brown JM, Fallowfield L, Selby P. Lack of communication between healthcare professionals and women with ovarian cancer about sexual issues. Br J Cancer. 2003 Mar 10;88(5):666-71. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600799. |
| 28547655 | Background | Stabile C, Goldfarb S, Baser RE, Goldfrank DJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Barakat RR, Dickler MN, Carter J. Sexual health needs and educational intervention preferences for women with cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Aug;165(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4305-6. Epub 2017 May 25. |
| 35915298 | Background | Huynh V, Vemuru S, Hampanda K, Pettigrew J, Fasano M, Coons HL, Rojas KE, Afghahi A, Ahrendt G, Kim S, Matlock DD, Tevis SE. No One-Size-Fits-All: Sexual Health Education Preferences in Patients with Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(10):6238-6251. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12126-7. Epub 2022 Aug 1. |
| 28851459 | Background | Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3. |
| 23387911 | Background | Flynn KE, Lin L, Cyranowski JM, Reeve BB, Reese JB, Jeffery DD, Smith AW, Porter LS, Dombeck CB, Bruner DW, Keefe FJ, Weinfurt KP. Development of the NIH PROMIS (R) Sexual Function and Satisfaction measures in patients with cancer. J Sex Med. 2013 Feb;10 Suppl 1(0 1):43-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02995.x. |
| 41586882 | Derived | Higgins MG, Helmkamp L, Zimmaro LA, Leslie SE, Adams M, Vemuru S, Huynh VD, Baurle E, Bozzuto L, Rojas KE, Coons HL, Arkema A, Tevis S. Preliminary evaluation of the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of an online sexual health educational video series for breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2026 Jan 26;34(2):130. doi: 10.1007/s00520-026-10381-y. |
| D001941 |
| Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |