Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A robot arm for upper limb rehabilitation is intended to achieve rehabilitation effects through the study of robot control theory and the integration of sensors such as sEMG. The goal is to reduce the workload of rehabilitation therapists.
NTUH-ii is an upper limb rehabilitation robot. The aim of this robot is to reduce the workload of rehabilitation therapists and make the rehabilitation process more effective.
The robot can complete rehabilitation tasks, such as elbow flexion/extension, shoulder flexion/extension, and shoulder horizontal abduction/adduction, etc. By giving the desired trajectory, the robot can lead patients to do the tasks in passive mode or active mode.
However, curative rehabilitation should include the motion intention of patients. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of rehabilitation effect by combining the sensors (such as sEMG, IMU) to obtain the motion intention of patients and give the assistive movement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation by rehabilitation robot | Experimental | Rehabilitation therapists will determine the training mode based on the subject's movement ability. Passive training mode Active-assistive training mode |
|
| Traditional rehabilitation | Active Comparator | Traditional upper limb physical therapy is performed by the therapist. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTUH-ii, am upper limb rehabilitation robot arm | Device | Rehabilitation programs are planned based on the subject's capabilities, and the differences between assisted rehabilitation with a robot and traditional rehabilitation are compared. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment | Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity, higher scores indicate a better outcome. | 1 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment | Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity, higher scores indicate a better outcome. | Before the task and right away the experiment, 3 months, 6 months post intervention. |
| sEMG analyzation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meng Ting Lin, M.D. | Contact | +886-2312-3456 ext 67048 | mntinglin@ntuh.gov.tw |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Taiwan University Hospital | Recruiting | Taipei | Taiwan |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Traditional upper limb physical therapy | Other | Traditional upper limb physical therapy is performed by the therapist. |
|
using sEMG sensors to obtain the sEMG signal and applying 3×2 ANOVA to analyze.
| Before the task, right away the experiment and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months post intervention. |
| Modified Ashworth Scale | To measure the increase of muscle tone, score from 0 to 4, higher scores indicate the higher muscle tone. | Before the task, right away the experiment and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months post intervention. |
| Wolf Motor Function Test | To quantify upper extremity movement ability through timed single- or multiple-joint motions .and functional tasks. | Before the task, right away the experiment and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months post intervention. |
| Stroke Impact Scale | A self-report questionnaire that evaluates disability and health-related quality of life after stroke. Score from 0 to 100, Higher scores indicate a better outcome. | Before the task, right away the experiment and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months post intervention. |
| Motor evoked potential | action potential elicited by noninvasive stimulation of the motor cortex | Before the task, right away the experiment and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months post intervention. |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |