Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
• Introduction and rationale Nowadays, the use of dental implants for oral rehabilitation is a generally accepted treatment modality. During the first years of implant dentistry, dental implants were used mainly for the restoration of edentulous mandibles with implant-supported prostheses. Yet, there is a shift towards the application of dental implants for single-tooth replacements, supported by long-term studies reporting excellent survival rates. Not only in the aesthetic region, but also in the posterior maxilla and mandible there is a growing interest in restoring function. Dental implants show a good performance in the posterior region; in recent years attention has been shifted towards a better initial stability to reduce treatment time. Next to this, implants must be restored with crowns which are subject to minimal complications. Specially for the posterior region, companies have introduced the option of screw-retaining and zirconia as crown material, of which less technical complications are mentioned. The combination of posterior implants and screw-retained zirconia crowns are widely used, but prospective research on clinical performance and patient centered outcomes are scarce and 5-years results are lacking.
RESEARCH QUESTION To evaluate the clinical performance of Astra Tech Implants EV and Atlantis CustomBase Abutments with full-contour zirconia Atlantis Crowns in the posterior maxilla and mandible after a 5-years follow-up.
STUDY DESIGN The study design is an observational study of a group of 50 patients which were treated 5 years ago with a dental implant and a screw-retained implant-supported zirconia restoration because of a missing tooth in the posterior region.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| dental implant and a screw-retained implant-supported zirconia restoration | patients which were treated 5 years ago with a dental implant and a screw-retained implant-supported zirconia restoration |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Astra Tech Osseospeed EV® dental implant | Device | Prospective study of a group of 50 patients which were treated 5 years ago with a dental implant and a screw-retained implant-supported zirconia restoration because of a missing tooth in the posterior region. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in peri-implant marginal bone level (in millimetres) | Difference in peri-implant bone level measured in millimetres | 5 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant survival and restoration survival (in percentage) | Percentage of initially placed implants and restorations still in place after 5 years | 5 years |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study population: Patients referred to the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 5 years ago and treated with a dental implant and a screw-retained implant-supported zirconia restoration because of having a missing tooth in the posterior region. At the time of treatment:
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Henny Meijer, prof dr | University Medical Center Groningen | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Medical Center Groningen | Groningen | 9713AV | Netherlands |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|