Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy in Systolic Dysfunction and Wide QRS: Mortality, Heart Failure Hospitalization or Cardiac Transplant
Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy in Systolic Dysfunction and Wide QRS: Mortality, Heart Failure Hospitalization or Cardiac Transplant
Conduction system pacing vs biventricular resynchronization therapy in systolic dysfunction and wide QRS: mortality, heart failure hospitalization or cardiac transplant (CONSYST-CRT II trial).
Superiority trial that aims to study the composite endpoint consisting of all-cause mortality, cardiac transplant or heart failure hospitalization at 12-month follow-up.
To date, studies have shown that conduction system pacing could get similar clinical and echocardiographic responses to those obtained with biventricular therapy.
This study will randomize 320 patients to a strategy of biventricular pacing versus conduction system pacing.
CONSYST-CRT II study will analyze a clinical endpoint as primary endpoint and the following parameters in both groups: left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular volumes, echocardiographic response (>=15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume), NYHA functional class, heart failure hospitalization, all-cause mortality, cardiac transplant, QRS shortening, echocardiographic dyssynchrony (atrioventricular, interventricular, intraventricular) and global longitudinal strain.
As a secondary endpoint, baseline predictors of response to conduction system pacing and biventricular pacing according to cardiac magnetic ressonance and electrocardiographic imaging will be studied.
Clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic follow-up will be performed during 12 months.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
tolosana@clinic.cat93 2271778 (2094)
mapujol@clinic.cat93 2271778 (2094)