Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Fingers Brain Health Institute | OTHER |
| Karolinska Institutet | OTHER |
| af Jochnick Foundation | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A 2-arm (sequence), 2-period, 2-treatments, single blinded (outcome assessor), randomized crossover-trial (12+12 weeks with immediate contrast) comparing a low-carbohydrate-high-fat diet (LCHF) with a high-carbohydrate-low-fat diet (HCLF) among individuals with prodromal Alzheimer's disease.
The impact of macronutritional composition on cognitive health is not fully understood. On one hand, the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines propose a limit of total fat intake at 30% of total energy intake (E%), implying that carbohydrates provide at least 50 E%. On the other hand, some pilot studies on ketogenic diets (strict carbohydrate restriction, ≤10 E%) have shown promising results-while liberal carbohydrate restriction has not been investigated in a clinical trial among individuals with Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). It is unclear how important the metabolic state ketosis is for driving potential effects of ketogenic diets on cognitive health outcomes, and our previous observational analyses suggest that even macronutritional changes in the non-ketogenic range might impact cognitive function-although estimated effects differed between sub-samples. This pilot study evaluates the potential of liberal carbohydrate restriction, alternatively fat restriction, as targets for future large scale trials. Participants must be diagnosed with prodromal Alzheimer's disease, which means MCI in combination with biologically validated Alzheimer-pathology-but absence of dementia.
The aim of this trial is to generate a contrast within participants regarding a diet parameter of special interest: the carbohydrate/fat-ratio (CFr). In a randomized order, participants will be exposed to 12 weeks with a low CFr diet (LCHF) and 12 weeks with a high CFr diet (HCLF). In LCHF, sustained ketosis is not an aim but transient mild ketosis may appear in some participants. The following strategies will be used to enhance adherence:
Beyond a dichotomized comparison between the diet phases, the study is expected to generate data for a substantial number of observational panel analyses where individual continuous CFr-levels assessed at 5 timepoints may be used as the predictor variable. Those CFr-data will be assessed in parallel with health outcomes including neurodegenerative biomarkers in blood, metabolic biomarkers, and Continous Glucose Monitoring (CGM). Cognitive performance is measured only at 3 timepoints to minimize learning effects. The sample size is adapted to assess feasibility and trends in health outcomes. Due to the limited statistical power there is a considerable risk for type-II errors; therefore, p-values >0.05 should not be interpreted as absence of a clinically meaningful effect in this pilot. Effect modification will be explored by one pre-specified stratification: 1. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes epsilon-3/4 and 4/4; 2. All other APOE-genotypes.
A cross-over design with immediate contrast (no "wash-out" period) is applied, since it is not possible to define a wash-out value of CFr or reliably keep all participants on a particular CFr between the diet periods. Period 1 (and 2) may have a carry-over effect from pre-study CFr and period 2 may have a carry-over effect from period 1. Primary comparisons against baseline are at the end of each period (weeks 12 & 24) when carry-over effects are assumed to be relatively low.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1: LCHF-HCLF | Active Comparator | LCHF (12 weeks) followed by HCLF (12 weeks) with immediate contrast (no "wash-out" period) |
|
| 2: HCLF-LCHF | Active Comparator | HCLF (12 weeks) followed by LCHF (12 weeks) with immediate contrast (no "wash-out" period) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCHF | Other | A diet intervention with the following macronutrient targets: Carbohydrates: 10-25 E%; Fat 50-70 E%; Protein: 20-25 E%; Alcohol 0-5 E% |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment Rate | Number of participants that are randomized within 1 year from start of recruitment, or time to reach 40 randomized participants if reached within <1 year. | 1 year from recruitment start |
| Adherence | Self-reported carbohydrate/fat-ratio (CFr) from 7-day food record: Intra-individual difference in CFr (log-transformed) between the diet treatments (mean Period 1 [week 6 &12] vs. mean Period 2 [week 18 & 24], reversed by arm) expressed as standard deviations of the baseline distribution. | Week 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 |
| Retention Rate | The proportion of those randomized who complete the 12-week and 24-week follow-up with data on both a. Self-reported carbohydrate/fat-ratio; b. Secondary outcomes | Until the end of data collection |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Global Cognition | Mean of z-scores (higher=better) from 13 sub-tests of a modified Neuropsychological Test Battery (NTB), subsequently z-transformed. Sources of sub-tests include Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) test battery and Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS).
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) | Concentrations of blood glucose measured in blinded mode for participants every 5th minute. | Week 0, 6, 12, 18, 24; Seven days at each timepoint. |
| Food Record | Nutrient intake from self-reported 7-day food record. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Ability to fully understand written and verbal information regarding the study and provide signed and dated informed consent
Prodromal Alzheimer's disease, as defined by Mild Neurocognitive Disorder due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria, and evidence for underlying AD pathology by either:
(When the diagnosis prodromal AD is confirmed from medical record, no cognitive testing or renewed assessment of biological AD-pathology is needed for fulfilling this criterion.)
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Börjesson-Hanson, MD, PhD | Contact | +46-8-123 858 68 | anne.borjesson-hanson@regionstockholm.se | |
| Jakob Norgren, PhD | Contact | jakob.norgren@ki.se |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Anne Börjesson-Hanson, MD, PhD | Karolinska University Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolinska University Hospital | Recruiting | Solna | Sweden |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37275847 | Background | Norgren J, Sindi S, Sandebring-Matton A, Ngandu T, Kivipelto M, Kareholt I. The Dietary Carbohydrate/Fat-Ratio and Cognitive Performance: Panel Analyses in Older Adults at Risk for Dementia. Curr Dev Nutr. 2023 May 7;7(6):100096. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.100096. eCollection 2023 Jun. | |
| 37778510 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Since this is a feasibility study with limited statistical power for analyses on health outcomes, there is no prospective plan to share individual participant data (IPD). This may be reconsidered if feasibility can be established and data sharing can be scientifically, ethically, and legally justified.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Assessors of disease monitoring outcomes (defined as Secondary outcomes below) are blinded. One of the primary outcomes (Adherence) assessed by dietitian which cannot be blinded.
|
| HCLF | Other | A diet intervention with the following macronutrient targets: Carbohydrates: 50-60 E%; Fat 25-30 E%; Protein: 15-20 E%; Alcohol 0-5 E% |
|
|
| Week 0, 12, 24 |
| Amyloid β-42/40 | Ratio between β-Amyloid concentrations in blood. | Week 0, 6, 12, 18, 24; Primary comparison: ∆0-12 weeks (w) vs. ∆0-24 w, reversed by arm. |
| Phospho-Tau (pTau) 181/231/217 | pTau concentrations in blood. | Week 0, 6, 12, 18, 24; Primary comparison: ∆0-12 w vs. ∆0-24 w, reversed by arm. |
| Neurofilament Light (NFL) | NFL concentrations in blood. | Week 0, 6, 12, 18, 24; Primary comparison: ∆0-12 w vs. ∆0-24 w, reversed by arm. |
| Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) | GFAP concentrations in blood. | Week 0, 6, 12, 18, 24; Primary comparison: ∆0-12 w vs. ∆0-24 w, reversed by arm. |
| Week 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 |
| Body-Mass Index (BMI) | Calculated from measures of weight and height (kg/m^2). | Week 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 |
| Waist | (cm) | Week 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 |
| Blood Pressure | Systolic and diastolic blood pressure. | Week 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 |
| Ketone Bodies in Blood | Capillary concentrations of β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) measured with a handheld meter after an overnight fasting. | Week 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 |
| Glucose | Blood concentrations of glucose after an overnight fasting. | Week 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 |
| Glucose in Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) | Blood concentrations of glucose after 75 g glucose load. | Week 0, 12, 24; (Minutes 0, 30, & 120) |
| Insulin (OGTT) | Blood concentrations of insulin after 75 g glucose load. | Week 0, 12, 24; (Minutes 0, 30, & 120) |
| C-Peptide (OGTT) | Blood concentrations of C-Peptide after 75 g glucose load. | Week 0, 12, 24; (Minutes 0, 30, & 120) |
| Lactate (OGTT) | Blood concentrations of Lactate after 75 g glucose load. | Week 0, 12, 24; (Minutes 0, 30, & 120) |
| Hemoglobin 1Ac (HbA1c) | Blood concentrations of glycated hemoglobin | Week 0, 12, 24 |
| Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) | Blood concentrations of ApoB | Week 0, 12, 24 |
| High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) | Blood concentrations of HDL-C | Week 0, 12, 24 |
| Triglycerides | Blood concentrations of Triglycerides | Week 0, 12, 24 |
| Lipoprotein(a) | Blood concentrations of Lipoprotein(a) | Week 0, 12, 24 |
| The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa) | (Score 0-30; higher=better) | Week 0, 12, 24 |
| Cognitive Sub-domain: Memory | Mean z-scores of cognitive sub-tests 1-5, 7, 9-10, as defined above. | Week 0, 12, 24 |
| Cognitive Sub-domain: Non-Memory (Executive function / Processing speed) | Mean z-scores of cognitive sub-tests 6, 8, 11-13, as defined above. | Week 0, 12, 24 |
| Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) | Scale 0-15; higher score indicate more depressive symptoms. | Week 0, 12, 24 |
| RAND-36 | Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire from RAND Corporation; higher score=better. | Week 0, 12, 24 |
| Subjective Experiences of Diets | Questionnaires specific for this study, assessing subjective experiences by the participant and the study partner respectively. | Week 12, 24 |
| Adverse Events | According to International Council for Harmonisation and (ICH) - Good Clinical Practice (GCP) standards. | Through study completion (typically 24 weeks) |
| Norgren J, Sindi S, Matton A, Kivipelto M, Kareholt I. APOE-Genotype and Insulin Modulate Estimated Effect of Dietary Macronutrients on Cognitive Performance: Panel Analyses in Nondiabetic Older Adults at Risk of Dementia. J Nutr. 2023 Dec;153(12):3506-3520. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.09.016. Epub 2023 Sep 29. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000544 | Alzheimer Disease |
| D060825 | Cognitive Dysfunction |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003704 | Dementia |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D024801 | Tauopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D003072 | Cognition Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided