Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In current diagnostic work-up of patients with a cancer of unknown primary (CUP), approximately 50% of the primary tumor lesions remains undetected. Identification of the primary tumor site results in minimizing the potential morbidity from treatment by reducing morbidity by omitting the need for a mucosectomy of the bilateral base of tongue and tonsils, reducing the radiation field and better oncologic outcome than those with unidentified primary tumor. Clearly, new endoscopic 'real-time' imaging techniques are needed to visualize mucosal changes associated with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and increase detection rate of the primary tumor. Targeted fluorescence endoscopy enables the visualization of targeted tumor-specific biomarkers by using fluorescence, thereby enhancing the contrast between normal mucosa and tumor tissue. This could improve the detection of the primary tumor in cases where the primary tumor is not detected with white light endoscopy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | Experimental | Patients with cancer of unknown primary most probable originating from the head and neck area |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detection of lesions using fluorescence molecular imaging | Diagnostic Test | Using a fluorescence camera, lesions will be detected and biopsies will be taken to try and find cancer of unknown primary |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy in detecting primary tumours compared to white light endoscopy. | To determine the feasibility of targeted fluorescence endoscopy compared to white light endoscopy and a mucosectomy using cetuximab-800CW for the detection of the primary tumor in patients with CUP | During surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety aspects of cetuximab-800CW | To obtain information on safety aspects of cetuximab-800CW administration by registration of side effects, adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE) and suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSAR); | through study completion |
| Accuracy in detecting primary tumours with flexible fluorescence laryngoscopy at the outpatient clinic for primary tumor detection rates |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Medical Center Groningen | Recruiting | Groningen | 9713 GZ | Netherlands |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Accuracy in detecting primary tumours with flexible fluorescence laryngoscopy at the outpatient clinic for primary tumor detection rates |
| Flexible endoscopy will be performed 1-0 days before surgery. |
| To quantify intrinsic fluorescence signals of cetuximab-800CW; | To quantify intrinsic fluorescence signals of cetuximab-800CW; | During the procedure |
| To determine if ex vivo fluorescence imaging using cetuximab-800CW can be used for assessment of the surgical specimen after mucosectomy; | To determine if ex vivo fluorescence imaging using cetuximab-800CW can be used for assessment of the surgical specimen after mucosectomy; | immediatly after the procedure |
| To determine the specificity and positive predictive value of TFE and WLE for the detection of the primary tumor in patients with CUP. | To determine the specificity and positive predictive value of TFE and WLE for the detection of the primary tumor in patients with CUP. | end of study |
| To correlate and validate fluorescence signals in vivo and ex vivo with histopathology. | To correlate and validate fluorescence signals in vivo and ex vivo with histopathology. | 1-2 weeks after procedure |
| To study health-related quality of life data regarding the standard of care mucosectomy procedures performed with transoral robot surgery using the QLQ-C30, QLQH&N35 en de SWAL-QoL. | To study health-related quality of life data regarding the standard of care mucosectomy procedures performed with transoral robot surgery. | up to 6 weeks after surgery |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009382 | Neoplasms, Unknown Primary |
| D009959 | Oropharyngeal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis |
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D010610 | Pharyngeal Neoplasms |
| D010039 | Otorhinolaryngologic Neoplasms |
| D006258 | Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D010608 | Pharyngeal Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided