Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Fractyl Health Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endoscopic DMR Treatment Paradigm 1 (compared to sham) and to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of re-treatment with DMR at 24 weeks (compared to baseline and a single DMR procedure) in patients with type 2 diabetes with non-insulin glucose lowering medications.
The objective of this study is to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endoscopic DMR Treatment Paradigm 1 (compared to sham) and to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of re-treatment with DMR at 24 weeks (compared to baseline and a single DMR procedure) in patients with type 2 diabetes with non-insulin glucose lowering medications.
The aimed effect is an adequate or improved glucose regulation and a decrease of HbA1c. Secondary effects include improved cardiovascular, hepatic, and metabolic parameters.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| DMR procedure | Active Comparator | Patients receive Revita® DMR Treatment Paradigm 1. After unblinding at 24 weeks, they receive retreatment. |
|
| Sham procedure | Sham Comparator | Patients receive a sham procedure. After unblinding takes place at 24 weeks, patients receive a Revita® DMR Treatment Paradigm 1. 48 weeks after initial sham (= 24 weeks after first DMR) patients may receive retreatment, if they want to. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revita® DMR Treatment | Device | The Revita® System is an endoscopic treatment consisting of a single catheter and console designed to lift the duodenal mucosa with saline followed by controlled circumferential hydrothermal ablation of the mucosa. For this study Revita® DMR procedure will be conducted as follows: DMR Treatment Paradigm 1- After initial 2 Lift and Ablate step, remaining Lift: Ablate steps will be conducted in 1:1 manner. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety endpoint | Safety endpoint is evaluated 12 weeks post DMR and 12 weeks post retreatment with DMR - Number (percentage) of patients experienced device and procedure-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Unanticipated Device Effects (UADEs), Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs), Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSARs) | 12 weeks post DMR and 12 weeks post retreatment with DMR |
| Feasibility endpoint 1 | Feasibility endpoint is evaluated during and after the procedure: - Number of ablations, whether a DMR was successful (>3 ablations) | During procedure |
| Feasibility endpoint 2 | Feasibility endpoint is evaluated during and after the procedure: - Procedure time, defined as time between catheter in and catheter out. | During procedure |
| Efficacy endpoint 1 | Efficacy is evaluated at 24 weeks compared to baseline and sham: - Mean change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)/Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM) | 24 weeks post DMR/sham |
| Efficacy endpoint 2 | Efficacy is evaluated at 24 weeks compared to baseline and sham: - Change in HbA1c | 24 weeks post DMR/sham |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary safety endpoint | Secondary safety endpoint is evaluated during follow-up and compared to baseline and sham at week 24 and compared to baseline and 12 weeks after (re)-DMR for all patients: incidences and event rates of hypoglycemic events during complete study period | Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim van den Hoek, MD | Contact | +31621357593 | k.vandenhoek@amsterdamumc.nl | |
| Celine BE Busch, MD | Contact | +31621357593 | c.b.busch@amsterdamumc.nl |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jacques JG Bergman, MD, PhD | Amsterdam UMC | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amsterdam UMC, locatie VUmc | Recruiting | Amsterdam | Netherlands |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Website for people that are interested in participating. | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
Not provided
Not provided
In this study, both the study team and the study subjects are blinded to the treatment through the 24 week follow-up visit. While the endoscopist is not blinded to individual treatments, he is blinded to cohort level data and is not responsible for patient follow-up. At the 24 week visit, the subject and study team are unblinded. The subjects who received the sham treatment undergo DMR treatment.
|
|
| Sham procedure | Other | The sham control for the Revita DMR procedure. |
|
| Efficacy endpoint 1: mean change in HbA1c |
Efficacy endpoint 1: mean change in HbA1c |
| Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
| Efficacy endpoint 2: mean Change in Fasting Glucose | Efficacy endpoint 2: mean Change in Fasting Glucose | Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
| Efficacy endpoint 2: mean Change in Time in Range (TIR) | Efficacy endpoint 2: mean Change in Time in Range | Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
| Efficacy endpoint 3: In patients with baseline abnormal Alanine Transaminase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) values, change in ALT, AST, GGT | Efficacy endpoint 3: In patients with baseline abnormal ALT, AST and GGT values, change in ALT, AST, GGT | Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
| Efficacy endpoint 4: Change in body weight | Efficacy endpoint 4: Change in body weight | Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
| Efficacy endpoint 5: Change in Fasting C-peptide | Efficacy endpoint 5: Change in Fasting C-peptide | Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
| Efficacy endpoint 6: Change in FPG | Efficacy endpoint 6: Change in FPG | Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
| Efficacy endpoint 7: Change in homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) | Efficacy endpoint 7: Change in HOMA-IR | Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
| Efficacy endpoint 8: Change in Framingham Risk Score-Cardiovascular risk score (FRS-CVD) | Efficacy endpoint 8: Change in Framingham Risk Score-Cardiovascular risk score (FRS-CVD) | Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
| Efficacy endpoint 9: Change in MRI-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) | Efficacy endpoint 9: Change in MRI-PDFF | Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
| Efficacy endpoint 10: Achievement of HbA1c ≤ 53 mmol/mol (7.0%) | Efficacy endpoint 10: Achievement of HbA1c ≤ 53 mmol/mol (7.0%) | Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
| Efficacy endpoint 11: Change in food intake (amount of calories, fat, carbohydrates, proteins etc.) based on intake registration data | Efficacy endpoint 11: Change in food intake (amount of calories, fat, carbohydrates, proteins etc.) based on intake registration data | Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
| Mechanistic: Change in resection tissue findings in morphological features | Mechanistic: Change in morphological features | Week 12 after (re)DMR |
| Mechanistic: Change in resection tissue findings in functional level changes | Mechanistic: Change in functional level changes | Week 12 after (re)DMR |
| Mechanistic: Change in resection tissue findings in cellular level changes | Mechanistic: Change in cellular level changes | Week 12 after (re)DMR |
| Mechanistic: Mean Changes in small intestinal biopsy gene expression | Mechanistic: Mean Changes in small intestinal biopsy gene expression | Week 12 after (re)DMR |
| Mechanistic: Mean Changes in small intestinal biopsy metabolomics/proteomics | Mechanistic: Mean Changes in small intestinal biopsy metabolomics /proteomics | Week 12 after (re)DMR |
| Mechanistic: Change in Plasma Citrulline | Mechanistic: Change in Plasma Citrulline | Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
| Mechanistic: Change in Cystatin Value | Mechanistic: Change in Cystatin Value | Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003924 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided