Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prevention and treatment of CNS relapse remains a great unmet clinical need in the management of aggressive B-NHL. Hence, investigating novel diagnostic tests is of paramount importance to improve risk-stratification of lymphoma patients at diagnosis, as is the evaluation of novel therapeutic approaches that may prevent and / or treat CNS recurrence. Based on the highlighted evidence, the investigators hypothesize that ctDNA detected within the CSF could potentially improve the detection rate of CNS involvement and consequently improve patients' stratification and better discriminate those in need of consolidative CNS prophylaxis on a molecular basis. Similarly, the investigators postulate that CSF ctDNA could be used as a monitoring tool to assess treatment response and guide therapeutic management.
Non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (B-NHL) are cancers that arise from a subtype of white blood cells (lymphocyte) and typically involve the lymphatic system; they represent 4% of all cancers [SEER database, access 2022]. Despite booming novel antineoplastic agent development, a significant number of aggressive B-NHL patients continue to succumb to their disease, experiencing rapidly progressive disease or early relapse. Central nervous system or CNS (brain, spinal cord and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)) involvement in aggressive B-NHL is a rare (2-5%) but it is a devastating event, with a life expectancy ranging between 2 and 5 months [PMID: 30125215]. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents fragmented DNA that originates from tumors cells, carrying specific cancer-associated mutations that can be detected in the blood or other fluids subsumed under "liquid biopsies".
The role of ctDNA gained momentum with the advent of high throughput sequencing technologies, becoming increasingly relevant for clinical practice. In lymphoma, detecting and monitoring ctDNA has been shown to be feasible and of high prognostic relevance regarding response and relapse. As such, ctDNA is emerging as a promising biomarker that can provide valuable diagnostic and prognostic information [PMID: 30125215, PMID: 29449275]. Identification of patients suffering from aggressive B-NHL at high risk of CNS relapse remains extremely challenging and currently mainly relies on a clinical score (CNS-IPI) [PMID: 27382100]. The detection of asymptomatic CNS is limited to conventional techniques and is not standardized [PMID: 22927246]. In patients with biopsy-proven CNS lymphoma, ctDNA can be detected in CSF (CSF ctDNA) in approximately 95% of cases. Furthermore, CSF ctDNA is predictive of CNS relapse in a small series of neurologically asymptomatic patients with aggressive B-NHL [PMID: 36542815, PMID: 32079701, PMID: 34551072]. Prevention and treatment of CNS involvement remains a great unmet clinical need. The discovery of novel and robust biomarkers is of paramount importance for early detection and risk-adapted therapeutic strategies for CNS involvement. The investigators hypothesize that CSF ctDNA is superior to current standard diagnostic procedures (e.g., flowcytometry or cytology) to detect CNS involvement in high-risk patients.
Furthermore, in patients with positive CSF ctDNA, the investigators also postulate that the concept of monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD, small amount of ctDNA that persists in patients that have no signs of active disease on standard imaging techniques) will provide additional information on patient prognosis.
This is a multicenter prospective diagnostic study to compare the performance of experimental diagnostic test (ctDNA) versus conventional cytology (CC) and flow cytometry (FC). Each high-risk B-NHL participant will proceed through standard work-up to evaluate potential CNS involvement including a neurological physical examination, a brain MRI and a diagnostic lumbar puncture. Each participant's CSF will be assessed by the two diagnostic tests (CSF ctDNA and conventional test (CC/FC)); the gold standard being proven CNS lymphoma involvement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| experimental diagnostic test | Experimental | Lumbar punction at diagnosis. CSF and blood samples will be assessed by the two diagnostic tests (CSF ctDNA and conventional test (CC/FC)) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ctDNA detection | Diagnostic Test | ctDNA detection on CSF and blood |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | Sensitivity of liquid biopsy (ctDNA) measured within CSF in its performance to detect CNS involvement in newly diagnosed high-risk B-NHL in comparison to standard conventional diagnostic approaches (CC / FC). For the evaluation of the primary endpoint, only patients with confirmed CNS involvement at baseline (real positives) will be analyzed. CNS involvement at baseline is defined as having at least one of the following conditions:
| at baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Specificity | Specificity of liquid biopsy (ctDNA) measured within CSF in its performance to detect CNS involvement in newly diagnosed high-risk B-NHL in comparison to standard conventional diagnostic approaches (CC / FC). For the evaluation of specificity, only patients without CNS involvement at baseline (real negatives) will be analyzed. Absence of CNS involvement at baseline is defined as having none of the following conditions:
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Informed consent as documented by signature before registration and prior to any trial specific procedures, according to Swiss law and ICH E6 regulations Swiss law and ICH GCP E6(R2) regulations before registration.
Histologically and/or cytologically confirmed newly diagnosed lymphomas including the following:
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with at least one of the following characteristics:
High-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC translocation with BCL2 and / or BCL6 (HGBL)
Burkitt lymphoma
Mantle cell lymphoma (blastoid variant or Ki67 >30% or TP53 mutated)
Primary CNS lymphoma
Note:
Aggressive transformation from indolent lymphomas (pretreated or not) are allowed
Patients enrolled in other clinical trials may be included
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Noémie Lang, MD | Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kantonspital Aarau | Aarau | 5001 | Switzerland | |||
| Universitätsspital Basel |
Not provided
This is a multicenter prospective diagnostic study to compare the performance of experimental diagnostic test (ctDNA) versus conventional cytology (CC) and flow cytometry (FC).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| at baseline |
| Time to lymphoma manifestation in the CNS | Time to lymphoma manifestation in the CNS, defined as time from diagnosis to one of the following events, whatever occurs first:
| from the date of registration until the date of assessment of neurological symptoms or death due to lymphoma, assessed up to 1 year after registration |
| Progression-free survival (PFS) | PFS is defined as the time from diagnosis to lymphoma progression or relapse as per Lugano and / or IPCG criteria, or death whatever occurs first. Patients not having an event at the time of the analysis will be censored at the date of their last tumor assessment showing non-progression. | from the date of registration until the date of progression or relapse as per Lugano and / or IPCG criteria, or death whatever occurs first, assessed up to 1 year after registration |
| Event-free survival (EFS) | EFS is defined as the time from diagnosis to lymphoma progression or relapse as per Lugano and / or IPCG criteria, treatment stop without achieving a complete response or death whatever occurs first. Patients not having an event at the time of analysis will be censored at the date of their last tumor assessment showing non-progression. This endpoint will be calculated separately for each treatment line. | from the date of registration until the date of progression or relapse as per Lugano and / or IPCG criteria, treatment stop without achieving a complete response or death whatever occurs first, assessed up to 1 year after registration |
| Overall survival (OS) | OS will be calculated from diagnosis until death from any cause. Patients not experiencing an event will be censored at the last date they were known to be alive. | from the date of registration until the date of death, assessed up to 1 year after registration |
| Overall response rate (ORR) | Overall response rate (ORR) is defined as either PR or CR according to the Lugano criteria. Patients with no tumor assessment will be considered:
| At the date of tumor assessment according to the Lugano criteria, assessed up to 1 year after registration |
| Duration of response (DOR) | DOR is evaluated in all patients who achieved a CR after the end of the intended treatment. DOR is defined as time from first complete response until lymphoma progression, relapse or death, whatever occurs first. Response and progression are evaluated according to Lugano criteria. Patients not having an event at the time of analysis will be censored at the date of their last tumor assessment showing non-progression. | from the date of first response CR until the date of lymphoma progression, relapse or death, whatever occurs first, assessed up to 1 years after registration |
| Time to minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity | Time from first documented MRD positivity (CSF ctDNA detected positive) to first documented MRD negativity. Patients not reaching MRD negativity will be censored at the last time they were known to be MRD positive. Evaluated only in patients with documented MRD positivity at any time. | from the date of first documented MRD positivity (CSF ctDNA detected positive) to the date of first documented MRD negativity, assessed up to 1 years after registration |
| Basel |
| 4056 |
| Switzerland |
| Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana (IOSI) | Bellinzona | 6500 | Switzerland |
| Inselspital Bern - Universitätsklinik für Medizinische Onkologie | Bern | 3010 | Switzerland |
| Kantonsspital Graubünden | Chur | 7000 | Switzerland |
| Hôpital Fribourgeois - Hôpital Cantonal | Fribourg | 1708 | Switzerland |
| Hopitaux Universitaire de Genève (HUG) | Geneva | 1205 | Switzerland |
| CHUV - Départment d'oncologie | Lausanne | 1011 | Switzerland |
| Kantonsspital Baselland | Liestal | 4410 | Switzerland |
| Kantonsspital Münsterlingen | Münsterlingen | 8596 | Switzerland |
| Kantonsspital St. Gallen | Sankt Gallen | 9007 | Switzerland |
| Hôpital du Valais, Hôpital de Sion | Sion | 1951 | Switzerland |
| Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie Hirslanden Zürich | Zurich | 8032 | Switzerland |
| Stadtspital Triemli Zürich | Zurich | 8063 | Switzerland |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008228 | Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008223 | Lymphoma |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided