Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Research Foundation Flanders | OTHER |
| University of Aarhus | OTHER |
| University of Sydney | OTHER |
| University Hospital, Ghent |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
After spinal cord injury (SCI), there is a disruption in neural circuits resulting in paralysis. There is not yet a cure for paralysis. In persons with Cervical SCI (pwC-SCI) recovery of arm-hand function is very important as it has a significant impact on the patients' level of independence and quality of life. Recovery is assumed to involve alterations in both central and peripheral motor systems. Motor training at an intensive dosage potentially provides a powerful stimulus for neurological recovery. This project exploits the peripheral and central neuroplastic effect of an early (<13 weeks after injury) and intensive (8 weeks of 6 hours in addition to usual care) upper limb motor training program (EIUMT) directed at recovery below the level of the injury in pwC-SCI within an international multi-center randomized controlled trial including 44 pwC-SCI. It has 4 objectives: to investigate 1)central neural plasticity by identifying alterations in cortical neuroplasticity and corticospinal excitability; 2)peripheral neural plasticity by identifying alterations in axonal excitability and number of motor units; 3)behavioral motor recovery of upper limb and 4)relationships between dose dimensions of motor intervention and behavioral and neurophysiological outcome measures after EIUMT. Cutting-edge neurophysiological measures are used to provide insight in the mechanism of neuroplasticity after EIUMT and will be taken before and after EIUMT and at 6 months follow-up.
Background of the study:
Paralysis or paralysis is the most common effect of spinal cord injury (SCI) on individuals. Paralysis affects the ability to walk, perform self-care, live independently and participate in work and leisure activities. In individuals with cervical spinal cord injury, arm and hand function is very important. The most promising and easily implemented intervention that could promote neurological recovery and make a lasting difference in the lives of people with spinal cord injuries is early and intensive motor training aimed at recovery below the injury level. This intervention takes advantage of the early plasticity of the nervous system. By maximizing muscle activation in the first few weeks after injury, we can target the nervous system's unique capacity for neural plasticity where changes can occur in central and peripheral motor systems.
Objective of the study:
This project aims to investigate peripheral and central neuroplasticity following an early (<13 weeks after injury) and intensive (8 weeks of 6 hours of additional therapy) upper extremity motor training program (EIUMT) aimed at recovery below the lesion level. This project has 4 objectives: to investigate 1) central neural plasticity (identify changes in cortical neuroplasticity and corticospinal excitability; 2) peripheral neural plasticity (identify change in axonal excitability and number of motor units); 3) clinical motor recovery of the upper limbs and 4) relationships between dose dimensions of motor intervention and clinical and neurophysiological outcome measures after EIUMT. Advanced neurophysiological measurements and clinical measurements will be taken before and after EIUMT and at 6-month follow-up.
Study design:
a multicenter pragmatic randomised controlled study in 2 countries
Study population:
44 persons with cervical spinal cord injury (22 participants in the control and intervention groups) Inclusion criteria: Individuals are eligible to participate if they have suffered a traumatic or non-traumatic cervical spinal cord injury within the previous 13 weeks, have AIS (ASIA Impairment Scale) A lesion with motor function more than three levels below motor level (on one or both sides) or have AIS C or AIS D lesion (as defined by the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of spinal cord injury), are older than 16 years of age, have received permission to begin rehabilitation and are likely to remain an inpatient for the next 8 weeks.
Exclusion criteria: Participants will be excluded if they have a significant medical or physical condition or psychiatric illness that could prevent the person from participating in the study or would place the person at unacceptable risk if they were to participate.
Intervention:
The intervention group receives 6 hours of motor training each week. This involves active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles below the injury level in the context of functional activities.
The control group receives only standard rehabilitation and care.
Primary study parameters/outcome of the study (Baseline vs 8 weeks after randomisation):
Central plasticity via: Single pulse TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) (Resting Motor Threshold) Peripheral plasticity via: Peripheral nerve assessment (Compound muscle action potential (CMAP)) Functional recovery via: Grades redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)
Secondary study parameters/outcome of the study:
Clinical Measures: Upper Extremity Motor Score, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SClM-selfcare); Van Lieshout Test (VLT); Hand-Held Dynamometry; accelerometry (session density: active therapy time/session length); perceived difficulty and exertion) Central plasticity: Single Pulse TMS: Stimulus-Response Function, Cortical mapping, Paired pulse TMS: SICI (short interval intracortical inhibition); LICI (long interval intracortical inhibition) Peripheral plasticity: NET (Nerve excitability testing) and MScanFit MUNE.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| intensive upper limb training | Experimental | The intervention group receives 6 hours of motor training each week upon usual care during 8 weeks. This involves active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles below the injury level in the context of functional activities. |
|
| usual care | Other | The control group receives only standard rehabilitation and care |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| experimental group: intensive motor training | Other | Intervention group: receive an extra 6 hours of motor training each week (distributed over the week) for 8 weeks. It will involve active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles of the upper limb below the level of the injury within the context of practice of functional activities. Interventions will be goal directed and individualized to the needs of each participant with a focus on training that addresses each person's specific motor problem, promoting motor learning as well as stimulating neural plasticity. All patients will continue to receive usual physiotherapy and usual rehabilitation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| changes in single pulse TMS: resting motor threshold | to asses changes in cortical reactivity | - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up |
| Changes in Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) | Changes in amplitude of CMAP | - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up |
| changes in GRASSP | Grades redefined assessment of strength sensibility and Prehension | - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Single-pulse TMS: Stimulus Response Curve | - to assess cortical excitability | - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up |
| changes SICI |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subjectively perceived session difficulty | VAS | measurement of one week during the 2., 5. and 8. week of intervention duration; before and after completion of session |
| Objective active time | accelerometry |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annemie Spooren, Prof. Dr. | Contact | 11269332 | annemie.spooren@uhasselt.be | |
| Lisa Tedesco Triccas, Prof. Dr. | Contact | lisa.tedescotriccas@uhasselt.be |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Annemie Spooren, Prof. Dr. | Hasselt University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revalidatieziekenhuis RevArte | Recruiting | Antwerp | 2650 | Belgium |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41857841 | Derived | Hrycyk IJ, Bertels N, Tankisi H, Glinsky JV, Oostra K, van Laake-Geelen C, Tedesco Triccas L, Spooren A. Central and peripheral neuroplasticity in cervical spinal cord injury following intensive upper limb motor training: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2026 Mar 18;16(3):e107352. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107352. |
Not provided
Not provided
Pseudomised data will be discussed with Aarhus University because they will assist in data analyses.
The protocol will be shared with the partners (Aarhus University, Sydney University, UZ Gent, UZ Leuven, RZ RevArte, and Adelante Zorggroep)
during and after data gathering
only for collaborating partners
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013119 | Spinal Cord Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013118 | Spinal Cord Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven | OTHER |
| Adelante, Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology | OTHER |
| Rehabilitation Hospital RevArte | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| usual care | Other | usual rehabilitation |
|
to evaluatie changes in Short interval intracortical inhibition
| - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up |
| changes in LICI | long-interval intracortical inhibition | - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up |
| changes in MscanFit MUNE | Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scans will be recorded | - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up |
| changes in single pulse TMS: mapping | to evaluate changes in cortical reorganisation | - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up |
| changes in NET (Nerve excitability testing) | Stimulus-Response Curve, Strength duration time constant (SDTC), threshold electrotonus (TE), I/V relationship (I/V) and recovery cycles (RC) will be measured. | - before intervention; at 4 weeks (inbetween measure), at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up |
| changes in behavioral measures: Upper extremity motor score | score on 50 | - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up |
| changes in Spinal Cord independence Measures | questionaire: self-care score | - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up |
| changes in Van Lieshout Test | basis upper extremity skills | - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up |
| changes in hand held dynamometry | strength in hand | - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up |
| Goal satisfaction | Subjective scoring 0-10 of four goals | - before intervention; at 8 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up |
| - measurement of one week during the 2., 5. and 8. week of intervention duration |
| Subjectively perceived session intensity | VAS (perceived exertion) | measurement of one week during the 2., 5. and 8. week of intervention duration; before and after completion of session |
| Therapy documentation | Total session length and UL training session length based on therapy documentation | whole trial period of 8 weeks |
| UZGent | Recruiting | Ghent | Belgium |
|
| UZLeuven Campus Pellenberg | Not yet recruiting | Leuven | Belgium |
|
| Zorggroep Adelante | Recruiting | Hoensbroek | Netherlands |
|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |