Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Neurocrine Biosciences | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this pilot study, the investigators will evaluate care delivery via telemedicine to individuals with drug-induced movement disorders (DIMDs). DIMDs can be disabling, and prevention is important; but these disorders are often under-reported, under-recognized and poorly managed. Interprofessional telemedicine for movement disorders is feasible and may provide similar care as in-person visits; however, the majority of studies to date have shown benefit in Parkinson's disease and further validation in other movement disorders is necessary.
In this randomized controlled trial the aim is to study the acceptability, feasibility, and patient and clinician outcomes when a neurological consultation is provided for patients with DIMDs either in-person or through telemedicine. The investigators will apply the evaluation framework RE-AIM (Reach and Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) to comprehensively assess the factors that may impact study success and program implementation. Mixed methods will be implemented to gather outcome data from mental health clinicians that refer patients and the patient participants.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Person | Other | Control group |
|
| Telemedicine | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Telemedicine Consult | Other | Neurological consultation completed remotely |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness; Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8) | How satisfied are patients with the program | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness; PROMIS 29+2 V2.1 | What are the impacts on patient health status | 12 months |
| Effectiveness; referral forms and visit notes | Was there concordance in diagnosis between the MHC and movement disorder specialist |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Reach | In this study, are we able to enroll a sample that is representative of the patient population that experiences DIMDs | 12 months |
| Adoption | Are there factors that determine whether a clinician will initiate participation in this program |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Vermont Medical Center | Burlington | Vermont | 05401 | United States |
Currently there is no plan to share individual participant data (IPD) with other researchers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| In-person Consult |
| Other |
Neurological consultation completed in-person |
|
| 12 months |
| Effectiveness; visit notes | Was there an impact on care plan | 12 months |
| Effectiveness; MHC survey and Qualitative Interviews | Were the MHCs Satisfied with the program | 12 months |
| 12 months |
| Implementation | What barriers exist that may determine the feasibility of the study and neurological consultation | 12 months |
| Maintenance; MHC survey and qualitative interviews | Could a telemedicine program similar to the one we develop for this study become a part of the routine organizational practices | 12 months |