Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
One of the most common medical approaches to the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) is the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) which became frequent due to high efficiency and safety of this procedure. Modern-day advances in pharmacotherapy and the device innovations over the last thirty years enhanced the benign outcomes of patients with unstable or multivessel CAD, and multiple co-morbidities, treated by PCI .
In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a recognized complication following percutaneous coronary intervention in which the luminal diameter is narrowed through neointimal hyperplasia and vessel remodeling. Although rates of ISR have decreased in most recent years owing to newer generation drug-eluting stents, thinner struts, and better intravascular imaging modalities, ISR remains a prevalent dilemma that proves to be challenging to manage. Several factors have been proposed to contribute to ISR formation, including mechanical stent characteristics, technical factors during the coronary intervention, and biological aspects of drug-eluting stents .identification of risk factors and mechanisms underlying ISR is necessary for understanding the process, the risk stratification, and optimal treatment development. Restenosis, as a physiological response to mechanical damage, involves two mechanisms which are neointimal hyperplasia and vessel remodeling [3]. Several factors such as age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, stenting of small coronary arteries, and final total length of stents have been shown to be associated with an elevated risk of restenosis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| cases group | patients with ISR confirmed by coronary angiography |
| |
| patients without restenosis non ISR group |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNA extraction AND Real- time polymerase chain reaction analysis to POLYMORPHISM OF in in-stent restenosis (ISR) in CAD | Genetic | Real- time polymerase chain reaction a gene polymorphism in in-stent restenosis (ISR) in CAD. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Angiotensin Converting Enzyme rs (1799752) gene polymorphism and Development of In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Diseases | GENOTYPING of Converting Enzyme rs (1799752) gene in Development of In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Diseases | 2 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This cross-sectional study will include all patients with stable CAD who had previously undergone balloon angioplasty with stenting using drug-eluting stents that referred to the catheterization lab unit of Sohag University for recurrence of angina symptoms or positive cardiac tests. According to the results of the control angiography, the patients will be divided into two groups: patients with ISR confirmed by coronary angiography (angiographic restenosis of more than 50% of the target vessel) and patients without restenosis non ISR group. The patients with ISR were classified into subgroups by the terms of the restenosis development ( early before 12 months & late after 12 months).
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| zeinab M Kadry, lecturer | Contact | 01225960747 | zainbmahmoud@med.sohag.edu.eg |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sohag university Hospital | Recruiting | Sohag | Sohag | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26417060 | Background | Byrne RA, Joner M, Kastrati A. Stent thrombosis and restenosis: what have we learned and where are we going? The Andreas Gruntzig Lecture ESC 2014. Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 14;36(47):3320-31. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv511. Epub 2015 Sep 28. | |
| 36597603 | Background | Donisan T, Madanat L, Balanescu DV, Mertens A, Dixon S. Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: Modern Approach to a Classic Challenge. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023;19(3):e030123212355. doi: 10.2174/1573403X19666230103154638. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
DNA EXTRACTION
|
| 22239896 | Background | Nakano M, Vorpahl M, Otsuka F, Taniwaki M, Yazdani SK, Finn AV, Ladich ER, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Ex vivo assessment of vascular response to coronary stents by optical frequency domain imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan;5(1):71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.09.015. |
| 16514079 | Background | Danilczyk U, Penninger JM. Angiotensin-converting enzyme II in the heart and the kidney. Circ Res. 2006 Mar 3;98(4):463-71. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000205761.22353.5f. |