Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study was a prospective, multicentre, randomized parallel controlled clinical trial. Randomisation was conducted by central randomisation, with random allocation codes generated by the main central computer. Enrollment was conducted by competition between different centres. In this study, the coronal, apical and angular deviations (mean, standard deviation, median, quartiles, minimum, maximum, 95% confidence interval) of the static template and dynamic navigation group guided implant placement were calculated. The data is proposed to be analysed using a mixed linear effects model.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynamic navigation | Experimental |
| |
| Static template | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dynamic navigation | Device | Dynamic navigation eliminates the need for a laboratory fabrication process and allows for direct visualisation of the operative area during implant placement. Moreover, it can avoid interfering with water cooling. Navigation-assisted surgery makes it possible to modify the implant system, length, diameter or position in real time, both in the perioperative period and during surgery. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Apical deviation of implant placement (mm) | Preoperative planning and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) were aligned together in the software and apical deviations(mm) of implant placement were measured to compare the results of the two groups. | About 3 days after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Coronal deviation of implant placement (mm) | Preoperative planning and postoperative CBCT were aligned together in the software and coronal deviations(mm) of implant placement were measured to compare the results of the two groups. | About 3 days after surgery |
| Angular deviation of implant placement (°) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
18 years old and above
American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) Levels 1 and 2
Satisfy any of the following requirements:
Implant-supported fixed restorations or implant-supported overdenture restorations
Sufficient usable bone volume at implant sites, non-implant sites (≥1.5mm of remaining bone width on the labial/buccal and palatal/lingual sides after virtual implant placement in software)
Maxillary and mandibular options for full-mouth patients are based on the inclusion of more single jaws in the non-bone grafted sites (see virtual peri-implant bone volume requirements in the pre-operative preparation phase)
Mouth opening of 3 fingers or more
Single-jawed missing patients treated with systemic periodontal therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jinyan Chen | Contact | +86 15652440777 | 15652440777@163.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yiqun Wu | Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital | Recruiting | Shanghai | China |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007575 | Jaw, Edentulous |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007571 | Jaw Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D009066 | Mouth, Edentulous |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Static template | Device | In most clinical situations, a static template can be used to assist in guiding the placement of implants precisely. The static guide has some limitations in that it requires additional fabrication time, has insufficient cooling in the surgical field and is not suitable for simultaneous grafting procedures. |
|
Preoperative planning and postoperative CBCT were aligned together in the software and angular deviations(°) of implant placement were measured to compare the results of the two groups. |
| About 3 days after surgery |
| Operation time | From anaesthesia to all implants are placed | Surgery day |
| Implant stability quotient | Implant stability quotient was measured with the Osstell®device | Surgery day |
| visual analogue scale | Patients were asked how they felt about the procedure using a visual analogue scale (VAS), which was measured using a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10. On a scale of 0 to 10 ("no pain" 0 to "maximum pain" 10) ("very comfortable" 0 to "not at all comfortable" 10) ("no swelling" 0 to "severe swelling" 10) | About 3 days after surgery |
| Failure rate | Failure rate of implants during the healing period | About 4 months after surgery |
| Change of marginal bone level(mm) | Marginal bone level = Measurement of the distance (mm) between the reference point (shoulder of the implant) and the point of bone-implant contact on the periapical film ; Change of marginal bone level = marginal bone level in the follow-up period - marginal bone level in the baseline period (mm) | About 1 year after surgery |
| D009059 |
| Mouth Diseases |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |