Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study was to compare between laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of inguinal hernia in recurrent inguinal hernia.
The primary objective in this study was to compare postoperative pain between the TAPP group and the TEP group. The secondary objective was to compare operative time, intraoperative complications (bleeding, bowel injury, vascular injury), postoperative complications (hematoma, seroma, wound infection), length of hospital stay and recurrence rate with possible risk factors which include gender, age, BMI ,cord lipomas and location of the hernia.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) | Active Comparator | patients with recurrent inguinal hernia who had Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach |
|
| Total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach | Active Comparator | patients with recurrent inguinal hernia who had Total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) using polyprolene mesh | Procedure | Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach for recurrent inguinal hernia using polyprolene mesh |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative pain | by use of visual analog scale (VAS) where (0) refereed to no pain and (10) refereed to the severest pain. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| operative time | operative time by minutes was reported to get mean and standard deviation | 6 months |
| complications | complications will be described as number and percentages in each group |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Islam Hisham, MSc | Mansoura University Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mansoura University Hospitl | Al Mansurah | Egypt |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006552 | Hernia, Inguinal |
| D006547 | Hernia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D046449 | Hernia, Abdominal |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C034807 | tetra-4-amidinophenoxypropane |
| C072829 | tetraethylpyrazine |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
patients diagnosed with recurrent inguinal hernia. The study population were randomly distributed into 2 groups by computer generating program; group (1) included patients who had Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach while group (2) included patients who had Total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach.
Not provided
Not provided
Each patient was randomly allocated to the TAPP group or the TEP group by sequentially numbered, opaque , sealed envelope (SNOSE) technique on the day of surgery. An independent statistician , who was not involved in patient care, generated the randomization sequence via a computer generated random number. The randomization code was contained in opaque sealed envelopes. A junior resident , who opened the envelope , was not actively involved in outcome measurements .Before randomization and during the consent, all patients received an explanation of the objectives of the study, techniques and complications associated with both procedures.
| Total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernioplasty using polyprolene mesh | Procedure | Total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach for recurrent inguinal hernia using polyprolene mesh |
|
| 6 months |