Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the present study was to compare the half-packed grafts that are covered with either a collagen or a nonresorbable membrane to the conventional alveolar ridge preservation procedures involving full-packed grafts and collagen membrane. The primary purpose was to evaluate the bone dimensional changes between the groups, and the secondary objective was to assess the potential contributing factors to clinical, radiographic and implant-related outcomes under different alveolar ridge preservation procedures.
Regarding different surgical approaches in alveolar ridge preservation, limited studies directly compare collagen and non-resorbable membrane, and the comparison between half- and full- grafting strategy in clinical and radiographic outcomes was still lacking. The comparable effect of dimensional preservation between groups was shown except for more radiographic bone gain in full-grafting group. Contributing factors, including thin bone thickness , vertical root fracture related sockets, non-molar sites and large BPD might attenuate the effect of ARP. At implant placement, similar results in bone quality and keratinized mucosal width was found in all groups, while thicker vertical mucosal thickness was obtained when using nonresorbable membrane. All surgical modalities in alveolar ridge preservation yield stable peri-implant health 1 year after implant placement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test1 | Experimental | half- (bottom 50% of socket filled with gelatin sponge and the top 50% of the socket filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral mixed with collagen (DBBM-C)) then covered with a collagen membrane in tooth sockets |
|
| Test2 | Experimental | half- (bottom 50% of socket filled with gelatin sponge and the top 50% of the socket filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral mixed with collagen (DBBM-C)) then covered with a nonresorbable membrane in tooth sockets |
|
| Control | Experimental | full-grafting (DBBM-C+ Collagen membrane) in tooth sockets |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alveolar ridge preservation | Procedure | Different grafting strategy of alveolar ridge preservation with different sealing materials |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| bone dimensional changes between the groups | Based on CBCT images, horizontal measurements by using AVIZO software (version 7.0, FEI). The measurements were repeated twice at a 2-week interval, and mean values were used for the final analysis (width or height in millimeters, mm):
Vertical measurements in cross-sectional images:
| 6-month healing period after alveolar ridge preservation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical and implant related outcomes | Other clinical and implant-related parameters with descriptions:
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taipei Chang Gung Memorial hospital | Taipei | 105 | Taiwan |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41525719 | Derived | Hsieh CH, Kuo PY, Chiu MY, Lin CY. The Effectiveness of Different Grafting Strategies in Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Retrospective Study of Two- and Three- Dimensional Radiographic Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2026 Jan 12;0(0):1-38. doi: 10.11607/jomi.11369. Online ahead of print. | |
| 38638057 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
Raw data were generated at Taipei Chang Gung memorial hospital. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author(CYL) on request.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001862 | Bone Resorption |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The operator (L.C.Y.) was blinded to the assignment and opened the envelope just before the alveolar ridge preservation procedures, while both the participants and the examiners (C.M.Y., P.Y.K.) remained completely blinded to the assignments in the study protocol.
| 6-month healing period after alveolar ridge preservation |
| Lin CY, Chiu MY, Kuo PY, Wang HL. Half- and full-grafting alveolar ridge preservation with different sealing materials: A three-arm randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Jun;26(3):651-662. doi: 10.1111/cid.13327. Epub 2024 Apr 18. |