Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a toothpaste containing stannous fluoride (SnF2) over time on the oral bacterial composition and activity and to explore its effect in comparison to a regular fluoride toothpaste.
This will be a single-center, 6-week, randomized, controlled, analyst and examiner-blind, two treatment, parallel group design, methodology development clinical study, investigating the efficacy of a toothpaste containing 0.454 percent (%) SnF2 in healthy adult participants with mild-moderate gingivitis. The study will describe and compare the overall oral bacterial composition and activity following 6 weeks use of a 0.454 % SnF2 toothpaste and regular fluoride toothpaste (control) using microbial and functional profiling techniques. Participants will be instructed to brush twice daily (morning and evening) in their usual manner, for 1-timed minute, for 6 weeks and to record each brushing in the diary provided. Sufficient participants will be screened to ensure approximately 50 participants complete the entire study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test Toothpaste | Experimental | Participants will be instructed to brush their teeth with the test toothpaste (Sensodyne Repair and Protect containing 1100 parts per million [ppm] fluoride as SnF2) for 1-timed minute twice a day (morning and evening) in their usual manner for 6 weeks. Participants will record each brushing in the diary provided. |
|
| Reference Toothpaste | Active Comparator | Participants will be instructed to brush their teeth with the reference toothpaste (Colgate Cavity Protection containing 1100 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate [SMFP]) for 1-timed minute twice a day (morning and evening) in their usual manner for 6 weeks. Participants will record each brushing in the diary provided. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stannous Fluoride Toothpaste (Sensodyne Repair and Protect) | Other | Sensodyne Repair and Protect toothpaste containing 1100 ppm fluoride as SnF2. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha Diversity at Baseline (Day 1) | Alpha diversity was defined as species diversity in sites or habitats and was used to describe the overall oral bacterial composition. Samples were collected from 4 different areas of mouth (tongue, supragingival plaque, subgingival surface, and saliva) and microbial profiling (16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid [rRNA] gene amplicon analysis) was performed to identify the bacteria present within a given sample down to the genus and/or species level. Alpha diversity (overall) was measured using Shannon index. Shannon Index was derived as the negative of the sum of the p*ln(p) across all species in the sample where p was the proportion of the sample made up from each species. Index scores ranged from 0 to ln(S) where S was the number of species in the sample. Higher values indicated greater diversity and a more complex community with a more even distribution of species. Lower values indicated lower diversity, suggesting dominance by a few species or a less complex community. | Baseline (Day 1) |
| Alpha Diversity at Week 6 | Alpha diversity was defined as species diversity in sites or habitats and was used to describe the overall oral bacterial composition. Samples were collected from 4 different areas of mouth (tongue, supragingival plaque, subgingival surface, and saliva) and microbial profiling (16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis) was performed to identify the bacteria present within a given sample down to the genus and/or species level. Alpha diversity (overall) was measured using Shannon index. Shannon Index was derived as the negative of the sum of the p*ln(p) across all species in the sample where p was the proportion of the sample made up from each species. Index scores ranged from 0 to ln(S) where S was the number of species in the sample. Higher values indicated greater diversity and a more complex community with a more even distribution of species. Lower values indicated lower diversity, suggesting dominance by a few species or a less complex community. | Week 6 |
| Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Abundance for Each Bacterial Group Assessed by Differential Abundance Analysis at Week 6 (Test Product) | Analysis of Compositions of Microbiomes with Bias Correction, version 2 (ANCOM-BC2) method was used to identify bacterial species that were differentially abundant between Baseline and Week 6. Samples were collected from 4 different areas of mouth (tongue, supragingival plaque, subgingival surface, and saliva) at the indicated timepoints, and differential abundance analysis was performed. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 6. Baseline was defined as Day 1. Log-fold change from Baseline in abundance (overall) for each bacterial group was reported. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
At Screening (Visit 1):
Exclusion Criteria:
A participant who is an employee of the investigational site, either directly involved in the conduct of the study or otherwise supervised by the investigator, or a member of their immediate family; or a sponsor employee directly involved in the conduct of the study or a member of their immediate family.
A participant who has participated in other studies (including non-medicinal studies) involving investigational product(s) in the 30 days prior to study entry and/or who is participating in other studies during study participation.
A participant with, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee, an acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator or medically qualified designee, would make the participant inappropriate for entry into this study.
A participant with any medical/oral condition which, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee, could impact study outcomes (for example, oral dryness or could directly influence gingival bleeding).
A participant taking daily doses of medication/having daily treatments which, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee, could impact study outcomes (for example, is causing oral dryness).
A participant who is pregnant (self-reported; no pregnancy test required) or intending to become pregnant over the course of the study.
A participant who is breastfeeding.
A participant with known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
A participant who is unwilling or unable to comply with the Lifestyle Considerations described in this protocol.
A participant who has difficulty complying with study procedures and examinations, such as excessive gagging during oral assessments.
A participant who has had routine dental prophylaxis within 12 weeks of Screening.
A participant who has undergone a tooth bleaching procedure (at-home or professional) within 8 weeks of Screening.
A participant with any of the following which, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee, could impact study outcomes or the oral health of the participants if they were to participate in the study:
A participant with the following:
A participant who is unwilling to forgo use of an orthodontic retainer for the duration of the study, provided there would be no impact on the outcome of any previous, completed orthodontic treatment or the participant's well-being.
Participant who is a current smoker or an ex-smoker who stopped within 6 months of Screening (Visit 1).
Participant who is a currently user of recreational drugs (example, cannabis) within 6 months of Screening.
Participant who currently uses smokeless forms of tobacco (example, chewing tobacco, nicotine-based e-cigarettes) within 6 months of Screening.
Visit 1 (Screening)
Visit 2 (Baseline)
1. A participant who has taken antibiotics during the lead-in period (between Screening and Baseline).
Participant with a recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse.
A participant who has previously been enrolled in this study.
Participant who, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee, should not participate in the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salus Research | Fort Wayne | Indiana | 46825 | United States |
Anonymized individual participant data and study documents can be requested for further research from ww.clinical-trial-register@haleon.com
IPD will be made available within 6 months of publishing the results of the primary endpoints, key secondary endpoints and safety data of the study.
Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months, but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.
Not provided
A total of 59 participants were screened of which 56 participants were enrolled, and 55 participants were randomized to receive treatment in 2 groups: Test Product group (28 participants) and Reference Product group (27 participants). 4 screened participants were not randomized (3 participants did not meet the study criteria and 1 participant was lost to follow-up). A total of 51 randomized participants completed the study.
This study was conducted at a single center in the United States.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Test Product (Sensodyne Repair and Protect) | Participants were instructed to apply a ribbon of test product (Sensodyne Repair and Protect toothpaste) containing 1100 parts per million [ppm] fluoride as stannous fluoride (SnF2) across the full brush head of toothbrush provided and brush their teeth for one timed minute twice daily (morning and evening) in their usual manner for 6 weeks. |
| FG001 | Reference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection) | Participants were instructed to apply a ribbon of reference product (Colgate Cavity Protection toothpaste) containing 1100 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate [SMFP] across the full brush head of toothbrush provided and brush their teeth for one timed minute twice daily (morning and evening) in their usual manner for 6 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Safety population included all randomized participants who completed at least one use of study product.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Test Product (Sensodyne Repair and Protect) | Participants were instructed to apply a ribbon of test product (Sensodyne Repair and Protect toothpaste) containing 1100 ppm fluoride as SnF2 across the full brush head of toothbrush provided and brush their teeth for one timed minute twice daily (morning and evening) in their usual manner for 6 weeks. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Alpha Diversity at Baseline (Day 1) | Alpha diversity was defined as species diversity in sites or habitats and was used to describe the overall oral bacterial composition. Samples were collected from 4 different areas of mouth (tongue, supragingival plaque, subgingival surface, and saliva) and microbial profiling (16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid [rRNA] gene amplicon analysis) was performed to identify the bacteria present within a given sample down to the genus and/or species level. Alpha diversity (overall) was measured using Shannon index. Shannon Index was derived as the negative of the sum of the p*ln(p) across all species in the sample where p was the proportion of the sample made up from each species. Index scores ranged from 0 to ln(S) where S was the number of species in the sample. Higher values indicated greater diversity and a more complex community with a more even distribution of species. Lower values indicated lower diversity, suggesting dominance by a few species or a less complex community. | Microbiome Population included all randomized participants who completed at least one use of the study product and had an evaluable microbiome result (at least one area at both Baseline and Week 6). | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Shannon index | Baseline (Day 1) |
From signing of informed consent form until 5 days after last administration of study product or last study procedure (up to approximately 51 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome is serious.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Test Product (Sensodyne Repair and Protect) | Participants were instructed to apply a ribbon of test product (Sensodyne Repair and Protect toothpaste) containing 1100 ppm fluoride as SnF2 across the full brush head of toothbrush provided and brush their teeth for one timed minute twice daily (morning and evening) in their usual manner for 6 weeks. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APHTHOUS ULCER | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haleon Response Center | HALEON | +441932959500 | ww.clinical-trial-register@haleon.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Sep 13, 2023 | May 19, 2025 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 22, 2024 | May 19, 2025 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Regular Fluoride Toothpaste (Colgate Cavity Protection) | Other | Colgate Cavity Protection containing 1100 ppm fluoride as SMFP. |
|
| Baseline and Week 6 |
| Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Abundance for Each Bacterial Group Assessed by Differential Abundance Analysis at Week 6 (Reference Product) | ANCOM-BC2 method was used to identify bacterial species that were differentially abundant between Baseline and Week 6. Samples were collected from 4 different areas of mouth (tongue, supragingival plaque, subgingival surface, and saliva) at the indicated timepoints, and differential abundance analysis was performed. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 6. Baseline was defined as Day 1. Log-fold change from Baseline in abundance (overall) for each bacterial group was reported. | Baseline and Week 6 |
| BG001 |
| Reference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection) |
Participants were instructed to apply a ribbon of reference product (Colgate Cavity Protection toothpaste) containing 1100 ppm fluoride as SMFP across the full brush head of toothbrush provided and brush their teeth for one timed minute twice daily (morning and evening) in their usual manner for 6 weeks. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Test Product (Sensodyne Repair and Protect) | Participants were instructed to apply a ribbon of test product (Sensodyne Repair and Protect toothpaste) containing 1100 ppm fluoride as SnF2 across the full brush head of toothbrush provided and brush their teeth for one timed minute twice daily (morning and evening) in their usual manner for 6 weeks. |
| OG001 | Reference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection) | Participants were instructed to apply a ribbon of reference product (Colgate Cavity Protection toothpaste) containing 1100 ppm fluoride as SMFP across the full brush head of toothbrush provided and brush their teeth for one timed minute twice daily (morning and evening) in their usual manner for 6 weeks. |
|
|
| Primary | Alpha Diversity at Week 6 | Alpha diversity was defined as species diversity in sites or habitats and was used to describe the overall oral bacterial composition. Samples were collected from 4 different areas of mouth (tongue, supragingival plaque, subgingival surface, and saliva) and microbial profiling (16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis) was performed to identify the bacteria present within a given sample down to the genus and/or species level. Alpha diversity (overall) was measured using Shannon index. Shannon Index was derived as the negative of the sum of the p*ln(p) across all species in the sample where p was the proportion of the sample made up from each species. Index scores ranged from 0 to ln(S) where S was the number of species in the sample. Higher values indicated greater diversity and a more complex community with a more even distribution of species. Lower values indicated lower diversity, suggesting dominance by a few species or a less complex community. | Microbiome Population. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Shannon index | Week 6 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Abundance for Each Bacterial Group Assessed by Differential Abundance Analysis at Week 6 (Test Product) | Analysis of Compositions of Microbiomes with Bias Correction, version 2 (ANCOM-BC2) method was used to identify bacterial species that were differentially abundant between Baseline and Week 6. Samples were collected from 4 different areas of mouth (tongue, supragingival plaque, subgingival surface, and saliva) at the indicated timepoints, and differential abundance analysis was performed. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 6. Baseline was defined as Day 1. Log-fold change from Baseline in abundance (overall) for each bacterial group was reported. | Microbiome Population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | log fold change | Baseline and Week 6 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Abundance for Each Bacterial Group Assessed by Differential Abundance Analysis at Week 6 (Reference Product) | ANCOM-BC2 method was used to identify bacterial species that were differentially abundant between Baseline and Week 6. Samples were collected from 4 different areas of mouth (tongue, supragingival plaque, subgingival surface, and saliva) at the indicated timepoints, and differential abundance analysis was performed. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 6. Baseline was defined as Day 1. Log-fold change from Baseline in abundance (overall) for each bacterial group was reported. | Microbiome Population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | log fold change | Baseline and Week 6 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 28 |
| 0 |
| 28 |
| 3 |
| 28 |
| EG001 | Reference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection) | Participants were instructed to apply a ribbon of reference product (Colgate Cavity Protection toothpaste) containing 1100 ppm fluoride as SMFP across the full brush head of toothbrush provided and brush their teeth for one timed minute twice daily (morning and evening) in their usual manner for 6 weeks. | 0 | 27 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 27 |
| ORAL MUCOSAL EXFOLIATION | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| TONGUE EXFOLIATION | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| SUNSCREEN SENSITIVITY | Immune system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| PERIORAL DERMATITIS | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
HALEON agreements may vary with individual investigators but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. HALEON supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
|
| Parvimonas sp._HMT_110 |
|
| Aggregatibacter aphrophilus |
|
| Kingella oralis |
|
| Haemophilus sp._HMT_036 |
|
| Haemophilus haemolyticus |
|
| Neisseria mucosa |
|
| Parvimonas sp._HMT_393_nov_97.053 percent (%) |
|
| Ottowia sp._HMT_894 |
|
| Cryptobacterium curtum |
|
| Lautropia mirabilis |
|
| Haemophilus paraphrohaemolyticus |
|
| Capnocytophaga sp._HMT_332 |
|
| Neisseria flavescens |
|
| Capnocytophaga gingivalis_nov_96.429% |
|
| Capnocytophaga sputigena |
|
| Haemophilus sputorum |
|
| Capnocytophaga gingivalis_nov_90.546% |
|
| Prevotella denticola |
|
| Aggregatibacter sp._HMT_513 |
|
| Veillonella sp._HMT_780 |
|
| Neisseria perflava |
|
| Slackia exigua |
|
| Shuttleworthia satelles |
|
| Aggregatibacter sp._HMT_458 |
|
| Ruminococcaceae_[G-1] bacterium_HMT_075 |
|
| Campylobacter showae |
|
| Streptococcus sp._HMT_056 |
|
| 0.0033243 |
| Other |
| Aggregatibacter sp._HMT_898: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.00500088 | Other |
| Parvimonas sp._HMT_110: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.0066975 | Other |
| Aggregatibacter aphrophilus: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.00710228 | Other |
| Kingella oralis: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.00744022 | Other |
| Haemophilus sp._HMT_036: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.01434037 | Other |
| Haemophilus haemolyticus: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.01955327 | Other |
| Neisseria mucosa: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.01995277 | Other |
| Parvimonas sp._HMT_393_nov_97.053%: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.02082528 | Other |
| Ottowia sp._HMT_894: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.02188156 | Other |
| Cryptobacterium curtum: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.02321733 | Other |
| Lautropia mirabilis: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.02397996 | Other |
| Haemophilus paraphrohaemolyticus: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.02509094 | Other |
| Capnocytophaga sp._HMT_332: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.02648847 | Other |
| Neisseria flavescens: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.02828764 | Other |
| Capnocytophaga gingivalis_nov_96.429%: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.03454372 | Other |
| Capnocytophaga sputigena: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.03747507 | Other |
| Haemophilus sputorum: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.03776136 | Other |
| Capnocytophaga gingivalis_nov_90.546%: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.03853215 | Other |
| Prevotella denticola: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.04751303 | Other |
| Aggregatibacter sp._HMT_513: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.05190512 | Other |
| Veillonella sp._HMT_780: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.0550647 | Other |
| Neisseria perflava: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.05861488 | Other |
| Slackia exigua: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.06727926 | Other |
| Shuttleworthia satelles: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.07051698 | Other |
| Aggregatibacter sp._HMT_458: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.0740793 | Other |
| Ruminococcaceae_[G-1] bacterium_HMT_075: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.07426973 | Other |
| Campylobacter showae: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.07829888 | Other |
| Streptococcus sp._HMT_056: Change From Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.08462924 | Other |
|
| Fusobacterium nucleatum_nucleatum_subspecies(subsp.)_animalis |
|
| Bergeyella sp._HMT_322 |
|
| Peptostreptococcaceae_[XI][G-1] [Eubacterium]_infirmum |
|
| Prevotella sp._HMT_317 |
|
| Bacteroidales_[G-2] bacterium_HMT_274 |
|
| Actinomyces sp._HMT_175_nov 97.951% |
|
| Slackia exigua |
|
| Granulicatella adiacens |
|
| Prevotella oris |
|
| Streptococcus sp._HMT_064 |
|
| Schaalia odontolyticus |
|
| Mogibacterium diversum |
|
| Prevotella denticola |
|
| Absconditabacteria_(SR1)_[G-1] bacterium_HMT_875 |
|
| Prevotella nigrescens |
|
| Streptococcus chosunense |
|
| 0.063437 |
| Other |
| Olsenella sp._HMT_807: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.069908 | Other |
| Fusobacterium nucleatum_nucleatum_subsp._animalis: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.079736 | Other |
| Bergeyella sp._HMT_322: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.094642 | Other |
| Peptostreptococcaceae_[XI][G-1] [Eubacterium]_infirmum: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.095848 | Other |
| Prevotella sp._HMT_317: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.107931 | Other |
| Bacteroidales_[G-2] bacterium_HMT_274: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.109114 | Other |
| Actinomyces sp._HMT_175_nov 97.951%: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.11083 | Other |
| Slackia exigua: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.120377 | Other |
| Granulicatella adiacens: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.123758 | Other |
| Prevotella oris: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.123992 | Other |
| Streptococcus sp._HMT_064: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.133385 | Other |
| Schaalia odontolyticus: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.144598 | Other |
| Mogibacterium diversum: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.147278 | Other |
| Prevotella denticola: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.148674 | Other |
| Absconditabacteria_(SR1)_[G-1] bacterium_HMT_875: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.149722 | Other |
| Prevotella nigrescens: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.154465 | Other |
| Streptococcus chosunense: Change from Baseline at Week 6 | ANCOM-BC2 | 0.158139 | Other |