Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Sexual dysfunction is commonly reported post cancer treatments. Sexual desire and body image are interrelated. Indeed, sexual wellbeing can be affected by diagnosis, medication and cancer treatments which can damage body tissues such as the vagina or penis owing to radiation therapy, or insufficient lubrication caused by chemotherapy. Additionally, feeling sore, exhausted, anxious, depressed and 'not in the mood' further contribute to changes in sexual desire
Very few evidence-based online interventions have been developed to address sexual difficulties post cancer treatments. This extends to well-being, sexual self efficacy and quality of life. It is imperative that mindful compassion interventions are based on a behavioural taxonomy to support the reliability in the delivery of these interventions. Indeed, this study has set out to identify and describe the key components and behaviour change techniques as part of the online intervention. These have been mapped to a behaviour change taxonomy with the view of supporting standardisation for future trial implementation. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of an online mindful-compassion intervention using the 3-system model of emotions based on the behavioural taxonomy among a post cancer treatment group with the view of improving quality of life. The study intends to provide preliminary estimates of pre-post intervention on a waitlist controlled randomised controlled trial looking at sexual self-efficacy, well-being, sexual desire, mindfulness and self-compassion.
Quantitatively, the research is structured so that participants will be randomised to either the active experimental or delayed group. This intervention will be weekly for approximately 1 to 2 hours over 4 weeks. This A follow-up at 12 weeks will be taken to determine the sustainability of this intervention.
Psychosocial interventions have varied in supporting post cancer treatments. An intervention gaining momentum in National Health Service practices is mindfulness. Mindfulness can mitigate negative self-thoughts and instead increase wellbeing and sexual self-efficacy which supports sexual functioning. Its applications are diverse and have extended to pre and post cancer treatment interventions. Benefits of mindfulness among post cancer treatment patients include lower levels of anxiety, depression and concerns regarding recurrence.
Mindful compassion is gaining popularity in health care. Mindful compassion consists of mindfulness, humanity, and self-kindness. Mindful compassion has been used in psychosexual services including varied sexual presentation such as sexual pain disorder. Indeed, the three systems model can be used to map out validate and normalise different emotional experiences - as well as map out how they can impact sexual arousal and enjoyment.
The intervention will be delivered by a qualified practitioner specialised in mindful compassion. Participants will be encouraged to engage with at home exercises including sensate, breathing exercises, sexual desire and fantasy diaries, mindfulness and self-compassion exercise including working with body image. This will be guided by the 3-system model of emotions where focus on mind and body will identify physiological changes to a perceived threat, to cognitively identify and attend to internal and external triggers and to incorporate mindful acceptance and compassion to address the critical inner voice. This will be applied to day to day living as well as applying this to sex, intimacy and body image. The foundation of the intervention will be based on a behavioural change taxonomy. This consists of 93 behaviour change techniques taxonomy in which the relevant taxonomies will be selected for this intervention. Table 1 outlines the foundation of the intervention. In total, 12 domains have been included in the development of this intervention. Of these, 20 out of the 93 Behaviour Change Techniques listed in the behaviour change techniques taxonomy were identified.
Table 1
Cognition
Psychosexual education - sex and cancer 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 Understanding sexual well-being, efficacy, desire, fantasy and intimacy 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 4.1 Understanding mindful compassion- the threat and drive systems (inner critic) 4.1, 6.1, 7.1, 8.1, 8.7,11.2 Cognitive recognition of the internal and external triggers in relation to threat and drive 2.3, 7.1, 12.1, 13.2, 15.4 Recognition and reframe with acceptance (mind and body- soothing) 13.2, 13.4, 15.2, 15.4, 16.2 Mental rehearsal of fantasy, sensate or sex whether literal or imagery 11.2,15.2, 15.4, 16.2
Behavioural
Self-care Behaviours 3.3, 12.6, 13.1, 13.4 Self-monitoring towards goals 1.1, 1.3, 2.3 Graded tasks towards sensate, sexual fantasy or sexual practice 8.1, 8.7 Restructuring the physical environment (sex furniture, use of porn etc) 12.1 Breathing exercises to minimise distress and increase calmness and safety 8.1, 8.7, 16.2
Self-acceptance/compassion towards feeling soothed and nurtured
Valued self-identity (mind and body) 11.2, 13.1, 13.4 Using sensate to identify body change with acceptance 12.6, 13.1, 13.4 Understanding emotions, feelings and intimacy 3.3, 11.2, 13.1, 13.2, 13.4, 15.2, 15.4, 16.2 Self-directed meditation 4.1, 6.1,8.1, 11.2,15.2 Body scan - better awareness of mind and body (top to toe) 4.1, 6.1, 8.1, 11.2, 15.2 Mindfulness practices and being aware of the present moment 16.2 Mindfulness stretching focusing on mind and body connection 4.1, 6.1, 8.1, 11.2, 15.2 Self-compassion with positive self-identity and sexual embodiment post cancer treatments 11.2, 13.1, 13.2, 13.4, 13.5, 15.3, 15.4
Structuring of intervention (online once a week for 1 to 2 hours)
Week 0 (baseline measurements taken)
Week 1 Introduction - psychosexual education
Week 2 The three-model system of emotions and sexual functioning
Week 3 Sexual intimacy and the inner critic
Week 4 Embracing life and embodied sexuality post-cancer (commencement of the delayed group)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental mindful compassion group | Experimental | Experimental randomised controlled waitlist study The experimental group (n=28) will receive mindful compassion intervention at week 1 and intervention terminates at week 4 |
|
| Waitlist mindful compassion control group | Other | Experimental randomised controlled waitlist study The delayed group (n=24) will receive mindful compassion intervention at week 4 and intervention terminates at week 8 |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindful compassion based on behavioural change taxonomy experimental group | Behavioral | Since this is a waitlist control study both groups get the same intervention. This is a mindful compassion intervention which is based on the behavioural change taxonomy techniques to support the reliability of the intervention. This will include sensate, mindful exercises, relaxation and attending to the critical voice. The intervention consists of behavioural, cognitive and mindful compassion constructs. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patients Health Questionnaire | Measures levels of depression for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The score ranges between 0 and 27, with a higher score representing higher levels of depression. | This is taken at week 0 |
| Female Sexual Function Index | This is a 19-item questionnaire on sexual function, including sexual desire, orgasm, lubrication, sexual satisfaction and pain. It has five response categories. Scores include severe 2-7.2, moderate 7.3-14.4, mild to moderate 14.5-21.6, mild 21.7- 28.1 cut-off value, and no female sexual dysfunction 28.2 -36.The lower the score, the higher the level of sexual dysfunction. | Weeks 0, 4 and 12 |
| Adapted Sexual Self-efficacy Erectile Tool | This is a 15-item questionnaire which focuses on sexual confidence and behaviour change associated with therapy. Participants' responses are measured by a 10-item scale ranging from 1 to 10 with 1 being the lowest level of self-efficacy and 10 is the highest. Scores range from 15 to 150 with higher levels representing higher levels of sexual self-efficacy. There is no reverse scoring. | Weeks 0, 4 and 12 |
| The Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale | A 7-item questionnaire with 5 response categories looking at functioning and feeling aspects of well-being. The response categories include 1=none of the time to 5=all of the time. There is no reverse scoring. Scores range from 7 to 35 where the latter is the highest level of wellbeing. | Weeks 0, 4 and 12 |
| The Brunnsviken Brief Quality of Life Scale | An 8-item questionnaire with five response categories looking at satisfaction with self, friends, family and creativity. The total score is calculated by summing the satisfaction ratings and summing the six products for a total score with score range between 0-96. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Only women participated in this study post breast cancer treatment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Samantha Banbury, PhD | London Metropolitan Univeristy | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London Met university | London | N7 8DB | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23512568 | Result | Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles MP, Cane J, Wood CE. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6. | |
| 4078907 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Randomised control waitlist n=28 active experimental group and n=24 waitlist control delayed group
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Weeks 0,4 and 12 |
| The Self-compassion Scale | This is a 12-item measure with five response categories, 1 = almost never to 5= almost always, with higher scores indicating higher levels of self-compassion. The questionnaire measures self-kindness and self-judgement, common humanity and isolation, and mindfulness and over-identification with painful thoughts and emotions. Scores range between. An estimated score between 1-2.5 for overall self-compassion score indicates low levels of self-compassion. 2.5-3.5 indicates moderate. 3.5-5.0 means high levels of overall self-compassion. | Weeks 0, 4 and 12 |
| Libman E, Rothenberg I, Fichten CS, Amsel R. The SSES-E: a measure of sexual self-efficacy in erectile functioning. J Sex Marital Ther. 1985 Winter;11(4):233-47. doi: 10.1080/00926238508405450. |
| 18042300 | Result | Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, Parkinson J, Secker J, Stewart-Brown S. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63. |
| 8880651 | Result | Spector IP, Carey MP, Steinberg L. The sexual desire inventory: development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability. J Sex Marital Ther. 1996 Fall;22(3):175-90. doi: 10.1080/00926239608414655. |
| 25462882 | Result | Tylka TL, Wood-Barcalow NL. The Body Appreciation Scale-2: item refinement and psychometric evaluation. Body Image. 2015 Jan;12:53-67. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 21. |
| Result | Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness ScaleRevised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(3), 177-190 |
| Result | Neff, K. D. (2003). Development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2, 223-250. |
| Result | Vosper, J., Irons, C., Mackenzie-White, K., Saunders, F., Lewis, R., & Gibson, S. (2021). Introducing compassion focused psychosexual therapy. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 1-33. |
| Result | Saunders, F., Vosper, J., Gibson, S., Jamieson, R., Zelin, J., & Barter, J. (2022). Compassion Focused Psychosexual Therapy for Women Who Experience Pain during Sex. OBM Integrative and Complementary Medicine, 7(2), 1-1. |
| 21584907 | Result | Raes F, Pommier E, Neff KD, Van Gucht D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):250-5. doi: 10.1002/cpp.702. Epub 2010 Jun 8. |
| 10782451 | Result | Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597. |