Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23/NW/0211 | Other Identifier | Ethics Committee |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Qure.ai Technologies Pvt. Ltd | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in the UK yet compared to Europe it has low survival rates.The NHS aims to find 75% of cancers at an early stage as this can improve the chances of survival.
To support this target, Qure.ai have developed the UK-approved qXR product, which is a software program that automatically analyses chest x-rays using artificial intelligence to identify features associated with lung cancer, indicative of other diagnoses, or that contain no abnormal features ('normal'). qXR is a class IIb medical device that can be used by radiologists to prioritise reporting based upon the presence or absence of these features. This may improve the accuracy and efficiency of reporting these images.
The project includes different elements including:
i) Clinical effectiveness study across 3 sectors within NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHSGGC).The primary objective is to assess the clinical effectiveness of qXR to prioritise patients that have suspected lung cancer (identified from AI analysis of a chest x-ray) for follow-on CT.
Primary study outcome measure - Time to 'decision to recommend CT', or to a decision not to undertake CT for CXR acquired with USC (CXR acquired to CXR reported).
Secondary objectives include:
i) To assess the potential utility of qXR within the optimised lung cancer pathway in terms of the impact on both patient treatment and radiological workflow.
ii) A technical evaluation utilising retrospective and prospective cohorts. The technical retrospective study will determine the performance of qXR using a sample of 1000 CXR images from all chest x-ray referral sources across all sectors (this differs from the prospective study, which only examines outpatient referred chest x-rays).
iii) A health economic evaluation. Use of per patient healthcare utilisation costs to model cost benefits of qXR, including implementation of supported reporting of normal CXR.
iv) A qualitative evaluation to assess acceptability and barriers to scale-up and implementation
A clinical effectiveness study will be conducted in 3 NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde sectors over a 12-month period.
Sectors will be identified and initiated into the qXR solution with a 30 day implementation period. The order in which sites will receive the qXR intervention will be determined by computer-based randomisation.
The technical retrospective study will determine the performance of qXR using a sample of 1000 CXR images from all chest x-ray referral sources across all sectors (this differs from the prospective study, which only examines outpatient referred chest x-rays). An economic evaluation will be conducted comparing costs and outcomes with and without the introduction of qXR. The software potentially impacts costs via two mechanisms: the identification of normal can enhance efficiency of CXR reporting; and the identification of USCs can support the prioritisation of CXRs that show signs of lung cancer, accelerating the provision of CT, which leads to faster diagnosis and treatment, and ultimately better outcomes.
Qualitative evaluation: To determine acceptability, staff interviews and patient focus groups will be carried out.
Data will be collected by an experienced qualitative researcher using a semi-structured interview guide, developed based on the key constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. All interviews will be conducted via Zoom at a mutually agreed upon date and time and are estimated to last, on average, around 45 minutes.
To capture the NHS service user perspective, the investigators will also conduct three online focus groups with approximately 20 NHS service users.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service deployment | Intervention Chest X-ray received - care team (standard of care) CT scan - care team (standard of care) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| qXR | Other | a software product that uses artificial intelligence to triage, prioritise, and (for tuberculosis only) diagnose based upon identified abnormalities within the CXR. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to 'decision to recommend CT', or to a decision not to undertake CT for CXR acquired with USC (CXR acquired to CXR reported) | Time to 'decision to recommend CT', or to a decision not to undertake CT for CXR acquired with USC (CXR acquired to CXR reported) | through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time from acquisition to reporting of all CXRs | Time from acquisition to reporting of all CXRs | through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Time to diagnosis of lung cancer | Time to diagnosis of lung cancer |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Service deployment within a single health board (NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde), within the following sectors and hospitals:
Clyde Sector
South Sector
North Sector
At each participating site, the investigators will identify all patients referred through the outpatient pathway (including GP-referrals). This will include those with suspected lung cancer referred for CXR.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David Lowe | NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Board HQ | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glasgow Royal Infirmary (North Sector) | Glasgow | United Kingdom | ||||
| NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39306349 | Derived | Duncan SF, McConnachie A, Blackwood J, Stobo DB, Maclay JD, Wu O, Germeni E, Robert D, Bilgili B, Kumar S, Hall M, Lowe DJ. Radiograph accelerated detection and identification of cancer in the lung (RADICAL): a mixed methods study to assess the clinical effectiveness and acceptability of Qure.ai artificial intelligence software to prioritise chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation. BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 20;14(9):e081062. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081062. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008175 | Lung Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012142 | Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
| D013899 | Thoracic Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Time to treatment initiation lung cancer | Time to treatment initiation lung cancer | through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Number of hospital visits during screening pathway | Number of hospital visits during screening pathway | through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Hospitalisation within 6 and 12 months CXR acquisition | Hospitalisation within 6 and 12 months CXR acquisition | through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Death within 6 and 12 months of CXR acquisition | Death within 6 and 12 months of CXR acquisition | through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Percentage of CXRs not identified by qXR as suspected lung cancer that the radiologist refers for CT for USC | Percentage of CXRs not identified by qXR as suspected lung cancer that the radiologist refers for CT for USC | through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Percentage of non-USC that are referred for CT with subsequent detection of lung cancer | Percentage of non-USC that are referred for CT with subsequent detection of lung cancer | through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Model performance e.g. sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. | Model performance e.g. sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. | through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Glasgow |
| United Kingdom |
| Queen Elizabeth University Hosp (South Sector) | Glasgow | United Kingdom |
| The Royal Alexandra Hospital (Clyde Sector) | Paisley | United Kingdom |
| D008171 |
| Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |