Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Venous thromboembolism is prevalent, associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality, and largely preventable. External mechanical compression is a standard of care for prevention, but compliance with traditional external mechanical compression devices is low due to patient reported issues with comfort, mobility, usability, noise, and sleep disturbances. The purpose of this study was to compare user-rated comfort, mobility, usability, noise, perceived sleep disturbance, and objective sleep disturbance for a novel external lower limb mechanical compression device as compared to a standard sequential compression device.
Using a 2-day counterbalanced, within-subject repeated-measures design, 16 participants wore two mechanical compression devices, the commonly-used Kendall sequential compression device Express 9525 and the novel Recovery Force Movement and Compressions Device for 1 night each in their home while sleep was recorded with polysomnography. For each device, participants also completed questionnaires to assess usability, mobility, perceived noise disturbance, and perceived sleep disturbance.
Recruitment
Study Procedures
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repeated measures | Other | Using a 2-day counterbalanced, within-subject repeated-measures design, 16 participants wore two mechanical compression devices, the commonly-used Kendall SCD Express 9525 (SCD) and the novel Recovery Force Movement and Compressions Device (RF-MAC) for 1 night each in their home while sleep was recorded with polysomnography. For each device, participants also completed questionnaires to assess usability, mobility, perceived noise disturbance, and perceived sleep disturbance. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF Health MAC Device | Device | Using a 2-day counterbalanced, within-subject repeated-measures design, 16 participants wore two mechanical compression devices, the commonly-used Kendall SCD Express 9525 (SCD) and the novel Recovery Force Movement and Compressions Device (RF-MAC) for 1 night each in their home while sleep was recorded with polysomnography. For each device, participants also completed questionnaires to assess usability, mobility, perceived noise disturbance, and perceived sleep disturbance. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Measure the impact of external mechanical compression on overall sleep. | Overall sleep will be measured using the Sleep Profiler. The Sleep Profiler is a battery powered portable device that provides a measure of the percentage of overall sleep vs wake in a given period of time. | 4 Months |
| Compare the comfort associated with mechanical compression between the two devices. | After each night of sleep, participants will provide their self-report on comfort using the Comfort Rating Scale. | 4 months |
| Compare the noise associated with mechanical compression between the two devices. | After each night of sleep, participants will provide their self-report on noise using the Environmental Comfort Scale. | 4 months |
| Compare the usability associated with mechanical compression between the two devices. | After each night of sleep, participants will provide their self-report on usability using the System Usability Scale. | 4 months |
| Compare the perceived sleep disturbance associated with mechanical compression between the two devices. | After each night of sleep, participants will provide their self-report on sleep disturbance using the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance: Short Form 8a. | 4 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion:
Exclusion:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Massachusetts Amherst | Amherst | Massachusetts | 01003 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Repeated measures study design where each participant gets both devices on different nights in random order
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|