A Randomized, Double-blind, Two-arm, Parallel Group, Single-dose, Phase I Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety Between CT-P41 and US-licensed Prolia in Healthy Male Subjects
A Randomized, Double-blind, Two-arm, Parallel Group, Single-dose, Phase I Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety Between CT-P41 and US-licensed Prolia in Healthy Male Subjects
A Randomized, Double-blind, Two-arm, Parallel group, Single-dose, Phase I Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety between CT-P41 and US-licensed Prolia in Healthy Male Subjects
This study was a randomized, double-blind, two-arm, parallel group, single-dose, phase I study designed to compare PK, PD, safety, and immunogenicity between CT-P41 and US-licensed Prolia in healthy male subjects. Subjects were randomized into a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose (60 mg) of either CT-P41 or US-licensed Prolia. The subjects were followed up for 253 days.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject was a female.
Subject with a hypersensitivity to any component of denosumab or dry natural rubber (a derivative of latex).
Subject was confirmed or suspected with infection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at screening, or had had contact with COVID-19 patient within 14 days from screening.
Subject had a medical history of and/or current medical condition that can have effect on the study. Details to be discussed with investigator as per Protocol.
Subject had a history of and/or concurrent use of medications including any prior therapy that can have effect on the study. Details to be discussed with investigator as per Protocol.
Subjects have or had any therapy that might significantly affect bone metabolism