Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Objectives: This research was planned to examine the effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on the post-traumatic stress symptoms of nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Design: Single-blinded study with parallel groups. Setting: Faculty of Nursing. Participants: 60 first-year students studying at the Faculty of Nursing were randomly assigned to the intervention (n=30) and control (n=30) groups.
Method: Data were collected using the Information Form prepared by the researcher and the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5. The intervention group was collected online three times, before the cognitive behavioral group therapy, at the end of the therapy and three months later. Group intervention program based on cognitive behavioral approach of ten sessions; face-to-face, the intervention group was divided into two separate groups and each group was completed in approximately one and a half months (May-June 2022), two days a week. Follow-up measurement was completed in September 2022. While group therapy was applied to the intervention group, no intervention was made to the control group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Behavioral Therapy | Experimental | Expert support was received from the Cognitive Behavioral Psychotherapy Practitioner and Trainer of the Turkish Psychiatric Association in the creation of the sessions. The researcher applying the therapy has a CBT practitioner certificate. Group intervention program based on cognitive behavioral approach of ten sessions; It was completed in approximately one and a half months (May-June 2022) in the Faculty of Nursing, by dividing the experimental group into two separate groups, two days a week for each group. Each session was held for approximately one hour. The last measurement was made three months after the last therapy session (September 2022). |
|
| Control | No Intervention | While group therapy was applied to the experimental group, no intervention was made to the control group. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Group | Other | Group intervention program based on cognitive behavioral approach of ten sessions; It was completed in approximately one and a half months (May-June 2022) in the Faculty of Nursing, by dividing the experimental group into two separate groups, two days a week for each group. Each session was held for approximately one hour. The last measurement was made three months after the last therapy session (September 2022). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) | Using the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the DSM-5, symptoms of post-traumatic stress are assessed. Scores ranging from 0 to 80 points are obtained in the scale. In the interpretation of the results of the scale, it gives information about the level of symptoms by calculating the total symptom score together with the sum of the scores of the symptoms in each item, and it is recommended to use 28 as the cut-off point, although it varies according to the purpose of use (Blevins et al., 2015). | First assessment will be made at the baseline (pre-intervention) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) | Using the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the DSM-5, symptoms of post-traumatic stress are assessed. Scores ranging from 0 to 80 points are obtained in the scale. In the interpretation of the results of the scale, it gives information about the level of symptoms by calculating the total symptom score together with the sum of the scores of the symptoms in each item, and it is recommended to use 28 as the cut-off point, although it varies according to the purpose of use (Blevins et al., 2015). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatma Yener Özcan | Meram | Konya | Turkey (Türkiye) | |||
| Burcu CEYLAN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068099 | Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Single-blinded study with parallel groups.
Not provided
Not provided
In the study, data collection, statistics and reporting were blinded. The collection of research data and data entry (pre-tests and post-tests and transferring the data to the computer) were carried out by an instructor other than the researcher, who was unaware of the intervention and control groups. Data entries were entered with "A" and "B" codes without specifying the intervention or control group. The analysis of the data and the writing of the research report were coded as "A" and "B" groups. After the statistical analysis was made and the research report was written, the coding for the intervention and control groups was explained to the researcher by the coder.
|
| The second assessment will take place 5 weeks after the first assessment (after the program is completed). |
| Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) | Using the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the DSM-5, symptoms of post-traumatic stress are assessed. Scores ranging from 0 to 80 points are obtained in the scale. In the interpretation of the results of the scale, it gives information about the level of symptoms by calculating the total symptom score together with the sum of the scores of the symptoms in each item, and it is recommended to use 28 as the cut-off point, although it varies according to the purpose of use (Blevins et al., 2015). | Third assessment will take place average 12 weeks after the second assessment. |
| Tekirdağ |
| Turkey (Türkiye) |