Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| LUPUS UK | UNKNOWN |
| King's College Hospital Charity | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the study is to investigate novel electroretinography (ERG) devices in the detection of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy. Two devices (the RETEval full-field and flicker ERG and UTAS multifocal ERG) will be evaluated in this study, comparing device outputs to standard of care screening tests, in groups of participants characterised by presence or absence of hydroxychloroquine-related retinopathy.
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a widely used drug used to treat disorders of inflammation in the body with up to 320,000 people estimated to be on this drug in the UK alone. Retinopathy due to HCQ is a significant problem, necessitating yearly screening which can only realistically take place in hospital eye units where funding and capacity constraints limit the provision of services.
Electroretinography is a non-invasive method of testing for eye retinal problems, which works by flashing light (in certain patterns and brightness) into eyes and measuring the electrical response through fine wires placed on the eye surface or behind the eyelid, and is considered by many authors to be a gold-standard test to detect HCQ retinopathy. Their use has been limited due to the high expertise required to undertake and interpret tests, limited availability of testing, and high test burden, however newer electroretinography devices have been developed by a company called LKC Technologies, which are faster to perform, use leads placed on the skin (rather than the eye surface) which are more comfortable, easier to use by healthcare technicians, and can be done without the need for dilating eyedrops. The two devices being tested in this study are:
These innovations may make testing far easier to develop in both hospital eye service, and potentially even general settings such as outpatient clinics, general practices, and optometrists. This study aims to evaluate the performance of devices to detect and classify participants in 4 main groups:
Device outputs will be analysed and compared with masked graded screening results (incorporating spectral-domain macular optical coherence tomography and autofluorescence as standard, taken on the same visit) to generate device- and device-output-specific sensitivities and specificities. If a signal is found, the feasibility outcomes from this study will inform the study methodology and timelines for a larger trial if necessary.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normative Controls | Age- and sex- matched normal controls |
| |
| On Hydroxychloroquine, NO retinopathy | Participants over 18 years on hydroxychloroquine without hydroxychloroquine-related retinopathy |
| |
| On Hydroxychloroquine, POSSIBLE retinopathy | Participants over 18 years on hydroxychloroquine with possible (indeterminate) hydroxychloroquine-related retinopathy |
| |
| On Hydroxychloroquine, DEFINITE retinopathy |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hand-Held Full-Field Skin-Electrode Electroretinography (Device to be evaluated) | Diagnostic Test | RETEval Complete hand-held electroretinogram |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The sensitivity and specificity of both devices to discriminate between NO, POSSIBLE and DEFINITE hydroxychloroquine retinopathy compared to standard screening tests | Primary Outcome | All tests required to determine sensitivity and specificity of both devices compared to standard retinal imaging will be completed in a single visit. Safety will be evaluated up to 1 week post-visit. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To compare the sensitivity and specificity of undilated versus dilated testing with the multifocal ERG device, for all categories of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy | Secondary Outcome | All tests required to determine this outcome will be completed at a single visit. Safety will be evaluated up to 1 week post-visit. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To determine which ERG waveform features (such as implicit time or amplitude) from both devices best discriminate participants with NO hydroxychloroquine retinopathy from those with POSSIBLE and DEFINITE hydroxychloroquine retinopathy | Exploratory Outcome | All tests required to determine this outcome will be completed at a single visit. Safety will be evaluated up to 1 week post-visit. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥18 years
HCQ groups:
a. HCQ use >5 years for patients without any high-risk factors, or >1 year in patients with one or more high-risk factors for HCQ retinopathy, namely: i. Dose >5mg/kg per day actual body weight (ABW) ii. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60mls/min/1.73m2 iii. Concomitant tamoxifen use
Control group:
Exclusion Criteria:
Amiodarone Canthaxanthin Deferoxamine Digoxin Ethambutol Interferon-alpha Melatonin Nefazodone Sildenafil Vigabatrin Chloroquine Quinine
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Age- and sex-matched control group (n=35) On hydroxychloroquine without retinopathy (n=35) On hydroxychloroquine with possible retinopathy (n=35) On hydroxychloroquine with definite retinopathy (n=35)
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr Chan Ning Lee | Contact | 020 3299 1297 | channing.lee2@nhs.net | |
| Ophthalmology research inbox | Contact | 020 3299 1297 | kch-tr.ophthalmologyresearch@nhs.net |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Professor Timothy L Jackson | King's College Hospital NHS Trust | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's College Hospital | Recruiting | London | London | SE5 9RS | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39719323 | Derived | Lee CN, Wafa HA, Murphy G, Galloway J, Mahroo OA, Jackson TL. Novel electroretinography devices to detect hydroxychloroquine retinopathy: study protocol for a diagnostic accuracy and feasibility study. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 24;9(1):e001898. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001898. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants over 18 years on hydroxychloroquine with definite hydroxychloroquine-related retinopathy
|
| Trolley-Mounted Multifocal Skin-Electrode Electroretinography (Device to be evaluated) | Diagnostic Test | UTAS multifocal electroretinogram |
|
| Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (Standard of Care test) | Diagnostic Test | Heidelberg Engineering Spectralis Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (macular structural scan) |
|
| Macular Autofluorescence (Standard of Care test) | Diagnostic Test | Heidelberg Engineering Spectralis Autofluorescence imaging (macular structural image) |
|
| To determine the patient acceptability of both devices evaluated using standardised, study-specific questionnaires |
Feasibility Outcome |
| All tests required to determine this outcome will be completed at a single visit. Safety will be evaluated up to 1 week post-visit. |
| To determine the proportion and recruitment rate of patients in each category of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy who consent to join this study. | Feasibility Outcome | All tests required to determine this outcome will be completed at a single visit. Safety will be evaluated up to 1 week post-visit. |
| To determine if both device waveforms correlate with standard mfERG waveforms in patients receiving hydroxychloroquine | Exploratory Outcome | All tests required to determine this outcome will be completed at a single visit. Novel device ERG waveforms will be compared with standard mfERG where undertaken in the preceding 12 months. Safety will be evaluated up to 1 week post-visit. |