Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Cross-sectional evidences suggest a relationship between early childhood sleep and cognitive as well as socio-emotional functions. However, the casual relation has not been fully revealed. The current study aims to perform a randomized lab-based crossover nap restriction study on preschoolers, to determine the effects of sleep restriction on preschoolers empathy, prosocial behaviors as well as executive functions.
The study will enroll preschoolers with regular nap habits. Under a randomized repeated-measures crossover design, they follow a strict sleep schedule (≥ 12.5 hours' time in bed every 24 hours) for 5 days, before each of two pseudorandomly assigned afternoon assessments following nap-rested or nap-restricted conditions. Actigraphy is applied to monitor sleep, and occipital alpha power is detected from resting-state EEG to objectively measure sleepiness. Empathy (Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm) and prosocial behaviors (Concern for Others Behavioral Paradigm) were measured at each assessment. The effects of nap restriction were analyzed with paired t-test/Wilcoxon matched-pairs sign rank test and repeated-measures ANOVA.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nap rested and nap restriction | Experimental | There are two conditions in the single-arm, that is, the nap rested condition and the nap restriction condition. The sequence of two conditions is randomized. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nap restriction | Behavioral | There are 2 interventions in the single-arm, that is, the nap rested condition and the nap restriction condition. The sequence of nap intervention followed randomization. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Voltage of N2 and Late Positive Potential (LPP) components | Child brain electroencephalogram (EEG) signals were collected via a non-invasive electrical brain cap and a wireless signal amplifier during the Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm. The paradigm presents 32 pairs of empathic pain-related pictures at each sleep intervention condition (e.g., a hand hit by a hammer). The children are asked to think about "How painful do you think the person in the picture feels?" while looking at each picture. After data processing, the voltages of N2 (i.e. the negative potential at approximately 200 ms poststimulus) and LPP (a protracted slow-wave component elicited by emotional stimuli) are output and compared across sleep conditions. | 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction |
| Empathic pain rating | The Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm presents 32 pairs of empathic pain-related pictures at each sleep intervention condition (e.g., a hand hit by a hammer). The children are asked to rate on "How pain do you think the person in the picture feels?" with the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating System. The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating System includes 6 faces demonstrating painful expressions, scoring 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 points respectively, with higher scores representing higher levels of vicarious painful feelings. The mean scores of ratings are used to compare the empathy behavioral level across sleep conditions. | 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Executive function - behavior | The Heart and Flower Paradigm is used to measure child executive function. The children are asked to press left button while seeing a heart in the middle of the screen, and to press the right button while seeing a flower in the middle of the screen. The correct rate and response time is used to compare the executive performance across sleep conditions. | 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Fan Jiang, PhD | Shanghai Children's Medical Center | Study Director |
| Guanghai Wang, PhD | Shanghai Children's Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University | Shanghai | Shanghai Municipality | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25394169 | Background | Miller AL, Seifer R, Crossin R, Lebourgeois MK. Toddler's self-regulation strategies in a challenge context are nap-dependent. J Sleep Res. 2015 Jun;24(3):279-87. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12260. Epub 2014 Nov 13. | |
| 34904310 | Background | Rong T, Sun X, Zhang Z, Li W, Deng Y, Wang Z, Meng M, Zhu Q, Jiang Y, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Wang G, Jiang F. The association between sleep and empathy in young preschoolers: A population study. J Sleep Res. 2022 Aug;31(4):e13530. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13530. Epub 2021 Dec 13. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Executive function - EEG signal | The Heart and Flower Paradigm is used to measure child executive function. The children are asked to press left button while seeing a heart in the middle of the screen, and to press the right button while seeing a flower in the middle of the screen. And the EEG signal are collected simultaneously. The β/Θ ratio of EEG signal is used to compare executive brain functions across sleep conditions. | 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction |
| Emotional arousal | During the Concern for Others Paradigm, the child's epidermal electricity level is measured at baseline and during the pain demonstration, and the differences between baseline and during the pain demonstration are used to compare the child's emotional arousal across sleep conditions. | 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction |
| Emotion regulation | During the Concern for Others Paradigm, the child's respiratory sinus arrhythmia level is measured at baseline and during the pain demonstration, and the differences between baseline and during the pain demonstration are used to compare the child's emotion regulation across sleep conditions. | 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction |
| Prosocial behavior level | After the Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm and Heart and Flower Paradigm are finished. Prosocial behaviors are measured under the Concern for Others Paradigm. Children are introduced to a playroom, where the experimenter plays with the child and "accidentally" hurts herself. The experimenter then demonstrates pain for one minute under standard procedure. Children's behaviors and expressions are recorded, and coded in four aspects: prosocial behaviors (1 to 6 points, higher scores represent higher levels of prosocial behaviors); empathic concern (1 to 4 points, higher scores represent higher levels of empathic concern); hypothesis testing (1 to 4 points, higher scores represent higher levels of hypothesis testing); and avoidance (0 to 1 points, higher scores represent higher levels of avoidance). | 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction |
| 28523733 | Background | Decety J, Meidenbauer KL, Cowell JM. The development of cognitive empathy and concern in preschool children: A behavioral neuroscience investigation. Dev Sci. 2018 May;21(3):e12570. doi: 10.1111/desc.12570. Epub 2017 May 18. |
| 21600660 | Background | Roth-Hanania R, Davidov M, Zahn-Waxler C. Empathy development from 8 to 16 months: early signs of concern for others. Infant Behav Dev. 2011 Jun;34(3):447-58. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 20. |
| 31894624 | Background | Adam N, Blaye A, Gulbinaite R, Delorme A, Farrer C. The role of midfrontal theta oscillations across the development of cognitive control in preschoolers and school-age children. Dev Sci. 2020 Sep;23(5):e12936. doi: 10.1111/desc.12936. Epub 2020 Feb 12. |
| 21988087 | Background | Berger RH, Miller AL, Seifer R, Cares SR, LeBourgeois MK. Acute sleep restriction effects on emotion responses in 30- to 36-month-old children. J Sleep Res. 2012 Jun;21(3):235-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2011.00962.x. Epub 2011 Oct 11. |