Comparative Study Between Wide Local Excision and Minimal Excision of Pilonidal Sinus
Comparative Study Between Wide Local Excision and Minimal Excision of Pilonidal Sinus
Comparative study between wide local excision and minimal excision of pilonidal sinus
Pilonidal sinus (PNS) disease is distributed in young adults who are supposed to be healthy with maximum productivity. Wide local excision creates a tissue gap, while the concept of minimal excision preserves healthy tissues with minimal tissue gap.
Pilonidal disease is a frequent suppurative condition that occurs twice as often in men as in women, usually between the ages of 15 and 30. Pilonidal disease is located beneath the skin of the sacro-coccygeal region. It presents acutely as an abscess under tension while the chronic form gives rise to intermittent discharge from pilonidal sinus(es). Diagnosis is clinical and usually straightforward. In the large majority of cases, treatment is surgical but there is no consensus as to the 'ideal' technique. Acute abscess must be evacuated and an off-midline incision seems preferable. Excision is the standard definitive treatment but the choice of wide versus limited excision on the school of thought. Minimal excision or debridement of the sinus and/or cavity through a midline or a separate paramedian excision can also be performed, leaving the wounds open or closed. These methods are simple and cost-efficient, and associated with low pain, rapid healing, and a rapid return to normal activity. A disadvantage is the higher recurrence rate; however, these methods can be used repeatedly for recurrences. Although recurrence rates seem high at first glance, the procedures can be successfully repeated for recurrences, achieving healing rates of over 90% for 1-2 interventions. Future well-designed trials are necessary to aid patient selection.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: