Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is being done to compare the effectiveness of de novo Letermovir versus valganciclovir in preventing the development of cytomegalovirus viremia or symptomatic disease in African American kidney transplant recipients within the first year after transplantation.
There are two arms in the study:
Arm 1: Prophylaxis: This group includes freshly transplanted high risk (CMV D+/R-) African American Kidney recipients who will be on prophylactic Letermovir for 6 month.
Arm 2: Prophylaxis: This group includes high-risk African American kidney transplant recipients who had already completed the 6 month prophylactic course with the standard of care Valganciclovir.
Valganciclovir (VGC) is the drug of choice for CMV prophylaxis. Although effective in preventing CMV infections, VGC is commonly associated with profound bone marrow suppression, specifically leukopenia which increases patients' vulnerability to other infections. Moreover, kidney transplant recipients often receive lymphocytic antibody therapy for induction immunosuppression, which further exacerbates the risk of leukopenia in the first 3-6 months after transplantation. The high leukopenia burden makes management of immunosuppression in the post-transplant setting more complex, often necessitating reduction in immunosuppressive agents that increases risk of allograft rejection.
Primary Objective: this study is being done to compare the effectiveness of de novo Letermovir versus the standard of care valganciclovir in preventing the development of cytomegalovirus viremia (defined as CMV PCR > 137 units/ml) or symptomatic disease in AA kidney transplant recipients within the first year after transplantation.
Secondary Objectives: included leukopenia incidence, acute rejection rates, breakthrough CMV rates, mycophenolate dose adjustments, donor-specific antibody formation, and tolerability.
To compare these these two groups the study uses
Outcomes of these two groups will be compared in 1:1 fashion. The study will attempt to match patients on Letermovir to the historical patients who received valganciclovir, based on age, kidney Donor profile index and the presence of panel of reactive antibodies.
Strategy for CMV Viremia: CMV viremia will be treated with either oral valganciclovir, intravenous ganciclovir or alternative agents, according to AST ID COP (American Society of Transplantation Infectious disease community of practice) guidelines.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Letermovir group (study group) | Experimental | Letermovir 480 mg once daily |
|
| Historical Control study group | Other | Historically matched AA kidney transplant recipients who received the standard of care 450mg once a day valganciclovir prophylaxis |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Letermovir 480 mg once daily | Drug | We will test the study hypothesis in a single center, matched (1:1 fashion) pilot study of Letermovir 480 mg once daily versus historically matched AA kidney transplant recipients who received valganciclovir. We will enroll 30 AA patients over a 12-month period into the Letermovir group and compare outcomes to a historical group of 30 AA kidney transplant recipients who have received valganciclovir prophylaxis (1:1 fashion), for a total of 60 patients. We will attempt to match patients on Letermovir to the historical patients who received valganciclovir, based on age, kidney Donor profile index and the presence of panel of reactive antibodies. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of cytomegalovirus viremia (defined as CMV PCR > 137 units/ml) or symptomatic disease in AA kidney transplant recipients | The incidence of cytomegalovirus viremia (defined as CMV PCR > 137 units/ml) or symptomatic disease in AA kidney transplant recipients by one year post-transplantation | up to one year after transplantation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Leukopenia (defined as WBC < 2.5 x 103 cells/mm3 beyond the first 2 weeks of transplantation, while on pharmacologic CMV prophylaxis) | The incidence of leukopenia (defined as WBC < 2.5 x 103 cells/mm3 beyond the first 2 weeks of transplantation, while on pharmacologic CMV prophylaxis)- assessed from 2 weeks up to 26weeks post-transplant | From 2 weeks up to 26 weeks post-transplant |
Not provided
Historical Control group:
Inclusion Criteria
Historical Control group:
Exclusion
Experimental Group Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gaurav Gupta, MD | Virginia Commonwealth University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VCU Medical Center | Richmond | Virginia | 23219 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Interventional, Historical Controlled, Single Center Open Label Pilot Study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Historical/Control | Other | The control study group will include high-risk African American kidney transplant recipients cared for with Valganciclovir in the 5 years prior to the enrollment start for the study group. This time frame is based upon the current volume of transplants done at VCU. On average 30 liver and/or kidney transplants are done per month. Thus, 5 years should be an adequate time frame to mine enough number of participants to answer our primary research hypothesis. |
|
| Impact of Pharmacological Prophylaxis on CMV T-Cell immunity up to 1 year post-transplant | CMV T-cell immunity assay, assessed up to 1 year post-transplant. At 12, 26 and 52 weeks post-transplant | up to 1 Year post-transplant |
| Incidence of acute kidney allograft rejection up to one year after transplantation | acute kidney allograft rejection up to one year after transplantation | up to 1 Year post-transplant |
| Impact of Pharmacologic CMV Prophylaxis on Mycophenolate dosage up to 6 months post-transplant | Changes in mycophenolate dosage (assessed by review of patient's chart) up to 6 months post-transplant | Up to 6 months post-transplant |
| Incidence of de novo donor specific antibody formation up to 1 year after transplant | de novo donor specific antibody formation up to one year after transplantation | up to 1 Year post-transplant |
| Tolerability of Letermovir in AA kidney transplant recipients up to 6 months post-transplant using a tolerability assessment questionnaire | Tolerability of Letermovir in AA kidney transplant recipient up to 6 months post-transplant (assessed through patient observation, tolerability assessment questionnaire, obtaining medical history and conduction physical examination during visits, receiving an unsolicited complaint from the participant, and an abnormal value or result from a clinical or laboratory evaluation). | up to 6 months post-transplant |
| Correlation between CYP3A5*1 and its impact on tacrolimus metabolism and incidence of kidney allograft rejection up to 1 year post-transplant | correlation between CYP3A5*1 and tacrolimus metabolism and incidence of kidney allograft rejection up to one year after transplantation | up to 1 Year post-transplant |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000588473 | letermovir |
| D055991 | Health Records, Personal |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008499 | Medical Records |
| D011996 | Records |
| D003625 | Data Collection |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided