Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
For several years, studies have been developed on the contribution of social robots as a tool for interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). One of the recommended intervention models is the ESDM (Early Start Denver Model). It consists of setting up an individualized, intensive program (at least 20 hours per week) through the pleasure of play. The teacher follows the motivation and interests of the child, and it is the child who chooses the activities. Studies published in recent years tend to show that robots bring benefits to ASD children, particularly in the treatment of social interactions and in clinical settings. However, there is no scientific consensus on the generalized contribution and effect over time of these interventions. Moreover, a robotic solution controlled by a practitioner through a telepresence system allows for a better adaptability to the responses and desires of the children during the interventions. The investigators believe that such a solution would allow for better assessment of progress in the core skills of expressive communication and imitation and greater engagement during interventions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children with autism spectrum disorders | Other |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) | Other | Phase A
Phase B :
Phase C :
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Score of success on the selected task in the ESDM program | Measure the success score for the selected task using the ESDM scoring grid. As soon as the child successfully completes one of the different learning stages, a success score is given to the task. This score will be maximum if all the learning stages of the task considered have been reached (Task 1 = 6 learning stages (maximum score =6); Tasks 2 and 3 = 7 stages (maximum score =7)). The ESDM scoring grid will be completed by the research therapists at the end of each session. | From phase A (baseline) to phase C (post-intervention) = 19 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time of the child's viewing and movement of the head and body towards the robot (task 1: saying "hello") | Measurement of the viewing and movement times toward the robot, as well as the response time from the analysis of the videos made during the sessions using the Pepper robot. Data from the robot: - Video recording by camera of the sessions of the whole room (camera independent of the robot) - Video return by the camera installed on the robot - Audio feedback from the therapist, the robot and the child. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time of the child's viewing and movement of the head and body towards the therapist (task 1: saying "hello") | Measurement of the viewing and movement times toward the therapist, as well as the response time from the analysis of the videos made during the sessions using the Pepper robot. Data from the robot: - Video recording by camera of the sessions of the whole room (camera independent of the robot) - Video return by the camera installed on the robot - Audio feedback from the therapist, the robot and the child. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients
Therapist
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amaria BAGHDADLI, Pr | Contact | 04 67 33 96 96 | a-baghdadli@chu-montpellier.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hôpital La Colombière - CHU de Montpellier | Recruiting | Montpellier | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39532363 | Derived | Fournier C, Michelon C, Granit V, Audoyer P, Bernardot A, Picot MC, Kheddar A, Baghdadli A. Pilot study protocol evaluating the impact of telerobotics interactions with autistic children during a Denver intervention on communication skills using single-case experimental design. BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 12;14(11):e084110. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084110. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000067877 | Autism Spectrum Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002659 | Child Development Disorders, Pervasive |
| D065886 | Neurodevelopmental Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| During Phase B = 11 weeks |
| From phase A (baseline) to phase C (post-intervention) = 19 weeks |
| Response time of the child after the presentation of the imitation exercise (task 2: action imitation) | Measurement of the child's response time during the imitation exercise | From phase A (baseline) to phase C (post-intervention) = 19 weeks |
| Number of objects given to the robot (task 3 : give an object on verbal request) | Measurement of the number of objects given out of the 5 requested (best score 5/5) in task 3. | From phase A (baseline) to phase C (post-intervention) = 19 weeks |
| Teleoperation success score for therapist (throught UX score) | Measurement of the success score (UX) of the teleoperation using the videos of the Pepper robot and according to the successful tasks to be performed during the session (the child and the second practitioner in the room can clearly hear the robot's instructions, the robot's gestures are fluid and is able to point to objects with the hand…). If the therapist was able to initiate each task, the score is 3/3. | Phase C (from week 5 to 15) |
| Parent satisfaction score on current care | Measurement of satisfaction score using a numerical satisfaction scale (EN). Parents will be asked about their current satisfaction with the care after each phase of the procedure. This will be rated on a scale of 0 to 10, (0 "I am not at all satisfied with the effectiveness of the proposed care" and 10 "I am totally satisfied with the care"). | During phase A (to 4 weeks), Phase B (to 15 weeks), Phase C (to 19 weeks). |
| Professional satisfaction score on current care. | Measurement of satisfaction score using a numerical satisfaction scale (EN). Professionals will be asked about their current satisfaction with the care after each phase of the procedure. This will be rated on a scale of 0 to 10, (0 "I am not at all satisfied with the effectiveness of the proposed care" and 10 "I am totally satisfied with the care"). | During phase A (to 4 weeks), Phase B (to 15 weeks), Phase C (to 19 weeks) |
| Score of success in the ESDM tasks without teleoperation | This score (observe/total) will be maximum if all the learning stages of the task in question have been reached (Task 1 = 6 learning stages (maximum score =6); Tasks 2 and 3 = 7 stages (maximum score = 7)). This scoring will be done by therapist at the end of each intervention, after the current care. | During phase A (to 4 weeks), Phase C (from week 16 to 19 |
| Score of success in the ESDM tasks with teleoperation | This score (observe/total) will be maximum if all the learning stages of the task in question have been reached (Task 1 = 6 learning stages (maximum score =6); Tasks 2 and 3 = 7 stages (maximum score =7)).The robotics analyses will be performed by a robotic engineer of the LIRMM independent to the project. | During phase B (from week 5 to 15) |
| Teleoperation usability score for therapist (throught UMUX score) | A User Experience Questionnaire (UMUX) was administered at weeks 5, 10 and 15 to assess the quality and ease of use of the teleoperation system over time. The questionnaires are evaluated on a scale from 0 (minimum score) to 10 (maximum score). 0=Not at all satisfied 10= Totally satisfied | During phase A (to 4 weeks), Phase B (to 15 weeks), Phase C (to 19 weeks) |