Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative healing of large and massive rotator cuff tears with preoperative MRI confirmed fatty infiltration stage II and higher repaired with or without dermal allograft augmentation (DAA).
The primary objective is to evaluate postoperative healing of rotator cuff repair with and without DAA.
Primary: The primary outcome measure is healing evaluation in MRI . MRI Post-Operative Assessment (Goutallier Stage and Sugaya Classification)
Secondary: The secondary outcome measures are patient-reported outcome measures from validated outcome scoring systems, including:
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES)
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (SANE)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain
Veterans RAND Health Survey (VR-12)
Population: Males and females between the ages of 30 and 75 years that require surgery for large and massive rotator cuff tears
Description of Treatment: Rotator cuff repair with or without augmentation using decellularized human dermal allograft.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repair without DAA | repaired without dermal allograft augmentation (DAA). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repair with DAA (dermal allograft augmentation) | Device | Patients undergo rotator cuff repair with dermal allograft augmentation. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The primary outcome measure is healing evaluation in MRI | MRI Post-Operative Assessment (Goutallier Stage and Sugaya Classification) MRI Post-Operative Assessment (Goutallier Stage and Sugaya Classification) | 26 Weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The secondary outcome measures are patient-reported outcome measures from validated outcome scoring systems | 1. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) A combination of objective measures and patient-reported outcomes, it measures pain and functional limitations in the shoulder. The objective questionnaire allows documentation of range of motion in the patient. | Preop, 26 Weeks, 1 Year, 2 Year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Intraoperative exclusion criteria:
Partial rotator cuff repairs
Lafosse grade 3 or higher subscapularis tears
Not provided
Not provided
Males and females between the ages of 30 and 75 years that require surgery for large and massive rotator cuff tears
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Caraci, BA | Contact | 18009337001 | caroline.caraci@arthrex.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alicia Ruiz, MS | Arthrex, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Arizona, Banner Health | Recruiting | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85006 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30485753 | Background | Kwon J, Kim SH, Lee YH, Kim TI, Oh JH. The Rotator Cuff Healing Index: A New Scoring System to Predict Rotator Cuff Healing After Surgical Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):173-180. doi: 10.1177/0363546518810763. Epub 2018 Nov 28. | |
| 33160028 | Background | Duong JKH, Lam PH, Murrell GAC. Anteroposterior tear size, age, hospital, and case number are important predictors of repair integrity: an analysis of 1962 consecutive arthroscopic single-row rotator cuff repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Aug;30(8):1907-1914. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.038. Epub 2020 Nov 4. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (SANE) | Asks patients to rate shoulder pain as a percentage of normal. | Preop, 26 Weeks, 1 Year, 2 Year |
| Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain | The standard measure for pain on a 0-10 scale, 10 being the worst. | Preop, two-week, six week, 26 Weeks, 1 Year, 2 Year |
| Veterans RAND Health Survey (VR-12) | A self-administered health measure. Answers are summarized into two scores, a Physical Component Score and a Mental Component Score, which provides an important contrast between the respondents' physical and psychological health status. | Preop, 26 Weeks, 1 Year, 2 Year |
| Orthopaedic & Nuerosurgery Specialists | Recruiting | Greenwich | Connecticut | 06831 | United States |
|
| Southern Oregon Orthopedics Research Foundation | Recruiting | Medford | Oregon | 97504 | United States |
|
| Tennessee Orthopedic Foundation for Research Education and Research | Recruiting | Nashville | Tennessee | 37204 | United States |
|
| 33080333 | Background | Pashuck TD, Hirahara AM, Cook JL, Cook CR, Andersen WJ, Smith MJ. Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Dermal Allograft Is a Safe and Effective Treatment for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: 2-Year Clinical Outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2021 Feb;37(2):489-496.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.014. Epub 2020 Oct 17. |
| 34767956 | Background | Jackson GR, Bedi A, Denard PJ. Graft Augmentation of Repairable Rotator Cuff Tears: An Algorithmic Approach Based on Healing Rates. Arthroscopy. 2022 Jul;38(7):2342-2347. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.10.032. Epub 2021 Nov 10. |
| 22607908 | Background | Omae H, Steinmann SP, Zhao C, Zobitz ME, Wongtriratanachai P, Sperling JW, An KN. Biomechanical effect of rotator cuff augmentation with an acellular dermal matrix graft: a cadaver study. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012 Oct;27(8):789-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 May 17. |
| 19245998 | Background | Snyder SJ, Arnoczky SP, Bond JL, Dopirak R. Histologic evaluation of a biopsy specimen obtained 3 months after rotator cuff augmentation with GraftJacket Matrix. Arthroscopy. 2009 Mar;25(3):329-33. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.05.023. Epub 2008 Jul 24. |
| 21978432 | Background | Barber FA, Burns JP, Deutsch A, Labbe MR, Litchfield RB. A prospective, randomized evaluation of acellular human dermal matrix augmentation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2012 Jan;28(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.06.038. Epub 2011 Oct 5. |
| 12700563 | Background | Cummins CA, Murrell GA. Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003 Mar-Apr;12(2):128-33. doi: 10.1067/mse.2003.21. |
| 29796103 | Background | Haque A, Pal Singh H. Does structural integrity following rotator cuff repair affect functional outcomes and pain scores? A meta-analysis. Shoulder Elbow. 2018 Jul;10(3):163-169. doi: 10.1177/1758573217731548. Epub 2017 Sep 25. |
| 17473131 | Background | Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J. Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 May;89(5):953-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00512. |
| 23183030 | Background | Mather J, MacDermid JC, Faber KJ, Athwal GS. Proximal humerus cortical bone thickness correlates with bone mineral density and can clinically rule out osteoporosis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jun;22(6):732-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.018. Epub 2012 Nov 22. |