Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) has become one of the major threats to the healthcare system in Hong Kong in recent years. The situation is particularly worrisome for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Taking Queen Mary Hospital as an example, the number of CRE cases has surged from 24 in year 2014 to 625 in year 2021. The case burden in Hong Kong is therefore substantial when all 43 public hospitals and institutions in Hong Kong are considered. With the widespread use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and active case screening, the number of CRE cases is expected to further increase in an exponential manner.
Given that colonization with MDROs is due to gut dysbiosis from antibiotic use, a normal intestinal microbiota is apparently crucial in protecting hosts from colonization with MDROs including CRE. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), which involves the infusion of stool from a healthy donor to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract of a recipient, has gained popularity in recent years to restore colonic microbial diversity in various diseases associated with gut dysbiosis, e.g. Clostridium difficile (CD) infection, ulcerative colitis and even metabolic diseases. The investigators aim to conduct a double-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate the benefit of FMT via upper GI delivery (oral capsules) on CRE clearance.
CRE colonization is associated with a 16.5% risk of infection with a 10% mortality rate. CRE also poses a tremendous strain on the healthcare cost as well as the medical/nursing manpower. The hospital stay is lengthened by two-fold for CRE-infected cases compared with non-infected cases. CRE carriers frequently have to stay in acute hospitals for extended periods of time after settling their acute illnesses, both because of the logistic infeasibility of them being transferred to rehabilitation units or nursing homes, which are devoid of isolation rooms.
Proactive measures have been implemented in hospitals worldwide to prevent the spread of MDROs, especially to vulnerable individuals. Such measures usually include surveillance culture, contact tracing, isolation of carriers and environmental disinfection. Nevertheless, isolation facilities are not always readily available, particularly in resource-limited regions. In addition, contact isolation may result in various adverse effects on the mental well-being of isolated patients, such as depression, anxiety and anger. Time spent with patients in isolation by healthcare workers is less, with a negative effect on patient safety with an eight-fold increase in the risk of adverse events due to supportive care failure.
There has been a growing interest in extending FMT for the decolonization of CRE. However, most of the studies are limited to case reports or case series with small sample sizes (ranging from 10 to 39 patients) as shown by a recent systematic review. The pooled rate of CRE decolonization is promising at 62.1%. However, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) remains the most optimal study design to investigate the true beneficial effect of FMT on CRE decolonization. FMT via oral capsules has several advantages over upper GI delivery or colonoscopy. First, administration of fecal suspension via a feeding tube may not be acceptable to some patients. Second, colonoscopy carries complications of gut perforation, aspiration, and cardiopulmonary suppression from the use of sedatives, in particular among frail and elder patients. When FMT is given via oral capsules, it can even be administered in an outpatient setting, which could substantially reduce cost and waiting time.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fecal microbiota transplant | Active Comparator | This group's subject will receive FMT oral capsules for 2 days (the day of first ingestion as day 0). |
|
| Sham fecal microbiota transplant | Placebo Comparator | This group's subject will receive Placebo FMT oral capsules for 2 days (the day of first ingestion as day 0). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fecal microbiota transplant | Biological | Active comparator will receive oral capsules form of FMT for 2 days (the day of first ingestion as day 0) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CRE clearance rate | CRE clearance rate via FMT oral capsules | 1 month post-FMT |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CRE clearance rate | CRE clearance rate post-FMT | 1 week, 2 week, 3 month, 6 month and 12 month post-FMT |
| All-cause mortality | All-cause mortality post-FMT |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ka Shing Cheung | Contact | 22554769 | cks634@hku.hk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ka Shing Cheung | The University of Hong Kong | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21429622 | Background | Backman C, Taylor G, Sales A, Marck PB. An integrative review of infection prevention and control programs for multidrug-resistant organisms in acute care hospitals: a socio-ecological perspective. Am J Infect Control. 2011 Jun;39(5):368-378. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.07.017. Epub 2011 Mar 23. | |
| 28707337 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sham fecal microbiota transplant | Biological | Placebo comparator will receive placebo oral capsules FMT for 2 days (the day of first ingestion as day 0) |
|
| 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 12 month post-FMT |
| Quraishi MN, Widlak M, Bhala N, Moore D, Price M, Sharma N, Iqbal TH. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Sep;46(5):479-493. doi: 10.1111/apt.14201. Epub 2017 Jul 14. |
| 35461908 | Background | Macareno-Castro J, Solano-Salazar A, Dong LT, Mohiuddin M, Espinoza JL. Fecal microbiota transplantation for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: A systematic review. J Infect. 2022 Jun;84(6):749-759. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.04.028. Epub 2022 Apr 21. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069467 | Fecal Microbiota Transplantation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001691 | Biological Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided