Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Statitec | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The knee osteoarthritis is a frequent degenerative condition that mainly affects subjects over 60, population often weakened by numerous comorbidities and concomitant treatments, justifying the development of new therapies.
The viscosupplementation is a symptomatic treatment for knee osteoarthritis ; the objective of this intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid is to reduce knee pain and improve mobility. In practice, there are two protocols to administer viscosupplementation : in a single injection or in three injections performed weekly.
The present clinical investigation has the objective to evaluate the safety and efficacy of use of Pandora, a hyaluronic acid associated with tranexamic acid, in a single injection (HO-1) or in three injections performed weekly (HS-3), compared to a referred and commercialized medical device.
This clinical investigation is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, parallel groups study of a class III Medical Device.
This study is designed to compare the safety of use and the efficacy of Pandora in its two forms : in a single injection (HO-1) or in three injections (HS-3) to a single intra-articular injection of 2.5 ml (SINOVIAL®ONE)
A descriptive analysis will be carried out to characterize the demographic data, the history of the disease and its treatments, the clinical and radiological data of the patients at inclusion.
The efficacy of Pandora will be demonstrated by describing the variation of WOMAC A1 score "walking pain" of target knee in repeated measures.
In total, 252 participants will be enrolled across 40 study centers in France and Monaco.
The total duration of subjects' participation is 12 months ; overall study duration including the enrollment period is expected to take approximately 24 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Device : HO-1 | Experimental | Single injection Hyaluronic acid associated with tranexamic acid 4.8 ml will be injected in one time Intra-articular single injection
|
|
| Medical Device : HS-3 | Experimental | Three injections Hyaluronic acid associated with tranexamic acid 2.2 ml will be injected in three times (one injection per week) Intra-articular single injection
|
|
| Medical Device : SINOVIAL® ONE | Active Comparator | Hyaluronic acid 2.5 ml will be injected in one time Intra-articular single injection
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Device : HO-1 | Device | The injection will be performed at Day 1. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate the efficacy of the two medical devices containing Pandora gel, HO-1 and HS-3, on walking pain in the target knee, compared to the SINOVIAL® ONE. | Variation of the WOMAC A1 score "walking pain" of the target knee in repeated measures (weeks 4,12 and 26), between the first or single injection and the potential injection at week 26. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate the efficacy of viscosupplementation by HO-1 and HS-3 on walking pain of the target knee between day 1 and week 12. | Variation of the WOMAC A1 score "walking pain" of the target knee between day 1 and week 12 considering the repeated measures at weeks 4 and 12. | 3 months |
| To evaluate the efficacy of viscosupplementation by HO-1 and HS-3 on the pain of the target knee at weeks 4, 12 and 26 and week 12 as well as week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria :
Exclusion Criteria :
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Patrick Sac-Epee | Labrha | Study Director |
| Jean-Charles Balblanc, Dr | Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, HNFC | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cabinet de Rhumatologie | Annecy | France | ||||
| Centre de Chirurgie Orthopédique du Beaujolais |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32931933 | Background | Sellam J, Courties A, Eymard F, Ferrero S, Latourte A, Ornetti P, Bannwarth B, Baumann L, Berenbaum F, Chevalier X, Ea HK, Fabre MC, Forestier R, Grange L, Lellouche H, Maillet J, Mainard D, Perrot S, Rannou F, Rat AC, Roux CH, Senbel E, Richette P; French Society of Rheumatology. Recommendations of the French Society of Rheumatology on pharmacological treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2020 Dec;87(6):548-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 12. | |
| 15455338 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective, multicenter, controlled, single blind, randomized in parallel groups Clinical Investigation.
Subjects will receive one of three viscosupplementations depending on the randomization.
The study includes two periods :
Not provided
Not provided
Single blind
| Medical Device : HS-3 | Device | The three injections will be performed at Days 1, 8 and 15. |
|
|
| Medical Device : SINOVIAL® ONE | Device | The injection will be performed at Day 1. |
|
|
Variation of the pain on target knee, with repeated measures by WOMAC A score, constituted of 5 questions about knee pain, between day 1 and week 12, day 1 and week 26 as well as between day 1 and week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection of HO-1 at week 26. |
| 12 months |
| To evaluate the efficacy of viscosupplementation by HO-1 and HS-3 on the function of target knee at weeks 4, 12, 26 as well as week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26. | Variation of the function , with repeated measures by the WOMAC C constituted of 17 questions, between day 1 and week 4, day 1 and week 12, day 1 and week 26 as well as between day 1 and week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26. | 12 months |
| To evaluate the efficacy of viscosupplémentation by HO-1 and HS-3 on the analgesic drug consumption at weeks 4, 12, 26 as well as week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26. | Evaluation by the patient of his analgesic drug consumption during the two weeks prior each visit. | 12 months |
| To determine the number (and percentage) of patients "OMERACT-OARSI responsive" at weeks 4,12,26 as well as week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26. | Number (%) of "responsive" patients according to OMERACT OARSI criterion, at weeks 4, 12 and 26 (and week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26). | 12 months |
| To determine the number (and percentage) of "highly responsive" patients at weeks 4, 12 and 26 as well as week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26. | Number (%) of "highly responsive" patients with a decrease of WOMAC A1 > 50% at weeks 4, 12 and 26 (and week 52 for patients who didn't have HO-1 injection at S26). | 12 months |
| To determine the number (and percentage) of patients in whom target knee pain is considered acceptable according to the PASS criterion at weeks 4,12 and 26 as well as week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26. | Number (%) of patients reaching the threshold of PASS at weeks 4, 12 and 26 (and week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26). | 12 months |
| To determine the number (and percentage) of patients in whom the decrease of the target knee pain is considered important (MCII criterion) at weeks 4,12 and 26 as well as week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26. | Number (%) of patients whom the improvement at weeks 4, 12 and 26 (and week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26), is superior to the MCII. | 12 months |
| To determine the number (and percentage) of patients requiring a new injection at S26. | Number (%) of patients requiring an injection of HO-1 at week 26. | 6 months |
| To evaluate, at S52, the efficacy of the additional injection of HO-1 at S26 on pain and function of the target knee. | Variation of WOMAC between week 26 and week 52 at patients receiving injection of HO-1 at week 26. | 12 months |
| To evaluate, at S52, the benefit of the additional injection of HO-1 at S26 on analgesic drug consumption. | Decrease of analgesic drug consumption between week 26 and week 52 at patients receiving injection of HO-1 at week 26. | 12 months |
| To measure the self-reported treatment efficacy by the patient at weeks 4, 12, 26 and 52. | Evaluation of the efficacy of the treatment by the patient based on a 11 points numerical scale (0-10) at weeks 12,26 and 52. | 12 months |
| To evaluate the local tolerability (at the target knee), after each injection of HO-1 and HS-3, compared to SINOVIAL® ONE. | Number of adverse events occurring, at the target knee, after each injection during the 4 weeks following the first or only one injection, whose treatments causality is not evaluated as "not related". | 1 month |
| To evaluate the global tolerability of HO-1 and HS-3 throughout the follow-up between day 1 and week 52 in comparison with SINOVIAL® ONE. | Number of adverse events occurring during the 52 weeks of follow up, whose treatments causality is not evaluated as "not related". | 12 months |
| To assess patient's satisfaction regarding tolerability of HO-1 and HS-3 treatment between day 1 and week 4, compared to SINOVIAL® ONE. | Subjective assessment of tolerability by the patient, based on a 5 points numerical scale, 0 corresponding to "Very Good" and 4 "Very Bad" at day 8, day 15 and week 4 for group's patients HO-1 and SINOVIAL® ONE. | 1 month |
| To assess patient's satisfaction regarding the tolerability of HO-1 treatment at week 27 for patients who received an injection at week 26. | Subjective assessment of tolerability by the patient, based on a 5 points numerical scale, 0 corresponding to "Very Good" and 4 "Very Bad" at week 27 for patients receiving injection of HO-1 at week 26. | 6 months and one week (=27 weeks) |
| Arnas |
| France |
| Centre de Médecine du Sport du Beaujolais | Arnas | France |
| Cabinet de Rhumatologie | Bagnols-sur-Cèze | France |
| Cabinet de Rhumatologie La Savoureuse | Belfort | France |
| Hôpital Nord Franche Comté | Belfort | France |
| Cabinet de Rhumatologie de Palente | Besançon | France |
| Centre de Rhumatologie Nord Isère | Bourgoin | France |
| Cabinet de Rhumatologie | Castelnaudary | France |
| Polyclinique des Alpes du Sud | Gap | France |
| Cabinet de Rhumatologie | Gourdon | France |
| Centre Médical Dulac | La Ciotat | France |
| Cabinet Médical Tilsitt | Lyon | France |
| Centre Orthopédique Santy | Lyon | France |
| Clinique de la Sauvegarde | Lyon | France |
| Clinique Saint Charles | Lyon | France |
| Centre Médico-Social du Lac | Mantes-la-Jolie | France |
| Cabinet Médical Borely Mermoz | Marseille | France |
| Cabinet de Rhumatologie | Mâcon | France |
| Cabinet Médical | Montélimar | France |
| Groupe Médical Adhémar | Montélimar | France |
| Cabinet de Rhumatologie | Montpellier | France |
| Centre Médical Saint Roch | Montpellier | France |
| Cabinet Médical Pluridisciplinaire Wallach | Mulhouse | France |
| Cabinet de Rhumatologie | Nîmes | France |
| Clinique du Ter | Ploemeur | France |
| Cabinet Médical | Puyricard | France |
| Cabinet de Rhumatologie | Roanne | France |
| Cabinet Médical | Saint-Paul-lès-Dax | France |
| Groupe Médical Spécialisé - Le Premium | Strasbourg | France |
| Groupe Hospitalier de la Haute Saône - Hôpital de Vesoul | Vesoul | France |
| Cabinet de Rhumatologie | Villeurbanne | France |
| Cabinet de Rhumatologie | Viry-Châtillon | France |
| Pôle de santé des Sept Chemins | Vourles | France |
| IM2S | Monaco | Monaco |
| Background |
| Balazs EA. Viscosupplementation for treatment of osteoarthritis: from initial discovery to current status and results. Surg Technol Int. 2004;12:278-89. |
| 29268731 | Background | Concoff A, Sancheti P, Niazi F, Shaw P, Rosen J. The efficacy of multiple versus single hyaluronic acid injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Dec 21;18(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1897-2. |
| 27257981 | Background | Diracoglu D, Tuncay TB, Sahbaz T, Aksoy C. Single versus multiple dose hyaluronic acid: Comparison of the results. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016 Nov 21;29(4):881-886. doi: 10.3233/BMR-160714. |
| 28618868 | Background | Bhadra AK, Altman R, Dasa V, Myrick K, Rosen J, Vad V, Vitanzo P Jr, Bruno M, Kleiner H, Just C. Appropriate Use Criteria for Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis in the United States. Cartilage. 2017 Jul;8(3):234-254. doi: 10.1177/1947603516662503. Epub 2016 Aug 10. |
| 33267906 | Background | Li J, Liu R, Rai S, Ze R, Tang X, Hong P. Intra-articular vs. intravenous administration: a meta-analysis of tranexamic acid in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Dec 2;15(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02119-1. |
| 25797505 | Background | Ng W, Jerath A, Wasowicz M. Tranexamic acid: a clinical review. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(4):339-50. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2015.0011. Epub 2015 Mar 23. |
| 31800425 | Background | Jules-Elysee KM, Tseng A, Sculco TP, Baaklini LR, McLawhorn AS, Pickard AJ, Qin W, Cross JR, Su EP, Fields KG, Mayman DJ. Comparison of Topical and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Study of Effects on Tranexamic Acid Levels and Thrombogenic and Inflammatory Marker Levels. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Dec 4;101(23):2120-2128. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00258. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007267 | Injections |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004333 | Drug Administration Routes |
| D004358 | Drug Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided